Green finance and ESG practices as drivers of multidimensional corporate performance: Evidence from UAE-listed firms
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.23(1).2026.18
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2026, Issue #1, pp. 243-252
- 235 Views
-
61 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Growing regulatory and investor scrutiny of sustainability has intensified the need to understand whether green finance and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices translate into measurable corporate performance gains in emerging markets. This study examines how green finance and ESG practices influence multidimensional corporate performance among firms listed on the UAE stock market. Data were collected via a structured survey of finance and sustainability managers in companies listed on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange and the Dubai Financial Market; 167 valid responses (87.4% response rate) were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The survey was administered in the UAE in May 2025. Results show positive effects of green finance on efficiency (β = 0.341, p < 0.01), effectiveness (β = 0.206, p < 0.01), sustainability (β = 0.157, p = 0.041), and customer satisfaction (β = 0.248, p < 0.01). ESG practices also improve efficiency (β = 0.288, p < 0.01), effectiveness (β = 0.179, p = 0.032), sustainability (β = 0.194, p < 0.01), and customer satisfaction (β = 0.142, p = 0.028). Joint modeling indicates complementary effects, with the strongest combined impacts on sustainability (β = 0.376, p < 0.01) and customer satisfaction (β = 0.408, p < 0.01); model fit is strong (GFI = 0.91; CFI = 0.96; RMSEA = 0.014). Overall, integrating green financing with robust ESG practices enhances corporate outcomes in the UAE, providing practical guidance for managers, investors, and policymakers.
Acknowledgment
The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at University of Bisha for supporting this work through the Fast-Track Research Support Program.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G32, Q56, M14, O16
-
References37
-
Tables6
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research theoretical framework
-
- Table 1. Overview of the sample demographic distribution
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics and measurement model indicators
- Table 3. Discriminant validity results based on the Fornell–Larcker approach
- Table 4. Model fit indices
- Table 5. Correlation matrix between variables
- Table 6. Results of hypothesis testing (direct effects)
-
- Austin, A., Alataş, S., & Agbonifi, D. (2025). Financing eco-innovation in an emerging economy: The role of internal resources, external support and government in Turkish SMEs. Sustainable Development. Advance online publication.
- Awad, A., Al-fil, N. Z., Dganni, K. M., Aldabousi, A. M., & Ahmad Obeidat, M. (2024). Optimizing dormant account management in UAE banking: Legal gaps and proposed reforms. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(4), 124-135.
- Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783-827.
- Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
- El Ghoul, S., & Karoui, A. (2020). What’s in a (green) name? The consequences of greening fund names on fund flows, turnover, and performance. Finance Research Letters, 34, 101267.
- Elamer, A. A., & Boulhaga, M. (2024). ESG controversies and corporate performance: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms and ESG practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), 3312-3327.
- El-Kassar, A. N., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment of SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 483-498.
- Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64.
- Gao, J., Hua, G., & Huo, B. (2024). Green finance policies, financing constraints and corporate ESG performance: Insights from supply chain management. Operations Management Research, 1-15.
- Gao, L., Zhang, X., & Li, Y. (2023). Investment efficiency, ESG performance, and corporate performance: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113–126.
- Hair, J. F., Hultm, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I – Method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63-87.
- Hu, H., Jia, Z., & Yang, S. (2025). Exploring FinTech, green finance, and ESG performance across corporate life cycles. International Review of Financial Analysis, 97, 103871.
- Huang, S., & Luan, Z. (2024). Can green finance supports improve environmental firm performance? Evidence from listed environmental firms in China. Finance Research Letters, 70, 106321.
- Hussain, Z., Mohammad, S. I., Vasudevan, A., Awad, A., & Bansal, R. (2025). Exploring the effect of Industry 5.0 human-centric sustainability and green knowledge automation in enhancing green process adaptability: The mediating role of sustainable human-tech interaction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 537, 147240.
- Ismail, T. H., & Obiedallah, Y. R. (2022). Firm performance and cost of equity capital: The moderating role of narrative risk disclosure quality in Egypt. Future Business Journal, 8, Article 44.
- Khan, M. (2019). Corporate governance, ESG, and stock returns around the world. Financial Analysts Journal, 75(4), 103-123.
- Khandelwal, V., Sharma, P., & Chotia, V. (2023). ESG disclosure and firm performance: An asset-pricing approach. Risks, 11(6), 112.
- Kim, J. Y., & Keane, A. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and performance in the workplace: A meta-analysis. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance. Advance online publication.
- Koh, H.-K., Burnasheva, R., & Suh, Y. G. (2022). Perceived ESG (environmental, social, governance) and consumers’ responses: The mediating role of brand credibility, brand image, and perceived quality. Sustainability, 14(8), 4515.
- Liu, T. L., Lin, T. T., & Hsu, S. Y. (2023). Exploring the perspective of bank employees on the impact of green process innovation and perceived environmental responsibilities on the sustainable performance of the banking industry. Sustainability, 15(22), 15925.
- Liu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Seuring, S. (2017). Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 451-468.
- Rau, P. R., & Yu, T. (2024). A survey on ESG: Investors, institutions and firms. China Finance Review International, 14(1), 3-33.
- Rizwan, M. S., Ahmad, G., & Ashraf, D. (2020). Systemic risk: The impact of COVID-19. Finance Research Letters, 36, 101682.
- Saygılı, E., Arslan, Ş., & Birkan, A. Ö. (2022). ESG practices and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 525-533.
- Shma, T. R., Awad, A. & Aziz, A. F. (2025). Investment behavior in the Egyptian stock market: The impact of social media on investor decision-making. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 22(1), 203-212.
- Simpson, A., & Tamayo, A. (2020). Real effects of financial reporting and disclosure on innovation. Accounting and Business Research, 50(5), 401-421.
- Song, J. (2024). Corporate ESG performance and human capital investment efficiency. Finance Research Letters, 62(Part B), 105239.
- The ESG App. (2024, January 5). “Who cares wins”: Transforming finance and economics through ESG. Sustainability Economics.
- UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). (2022). Economic and social survey of Asia and the Pacific 2022: Building forward fairer – Economic policies for an inclusive recovery and development (Sales No. E.22.II.F.5; ST/ESCAP/2998). United Nations.
- United Nations Environment Programme. (2015). The financial system we need: Aligning the financial system with sustainable development [Report].
- Usman, A. B., & Amran, N. A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility practice and corporate financial performance: evidence from Nigeria companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 749-763.
- Vo, D., & Phan, D. (2013). Corporate governance and firm’s performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Economic Development, 218, 62-78.
- Xie, Y. (2024). The interactive impact of green finance, ESG performance, and carbon neutrality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 456, 142269.
- Xu, X., Wang, S., Li, J., & Qiao, T. (2024). Environmental regulatory intensity, green finance and corporate green sustainable development performance. Heliyon, 10(9), e30114.
- Yusuf, A. A., Maryam, A. K., Shiddieqy, D. F., & Awad, A. (2025). The role of sukuk financing in economic growth and poverty reduction: Empirical evidence from selected ASEAN countries. Public and Municipal Finance, 14(2), 42-50.
- Zhan, S. (2023). ESG and corporate performance: A review. SHS Web of Conferences, 118, 01064.


