Characteristics of the boards of directors at firms listed on Nasdaq Baltic
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(3).2023.56
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #3, pp. 726-735
- 291 Views
-
52 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The board of directors plays a pivotal role in firm governance, endorsing strategic choices, coordinating operations, ensuring regulatory compliance, and furnishing organizational support. This paper aims to examine the characteristics of the boards of directors and the guidelines for board composition in publicly listed firms in the Baltic countries. The analysis consists of two stages. The first is a quantitative investigation of the attributes of boards (board size, CEO duality, gender diversity, foreign directors, board committees, board independence, and directors’ occupational background) targeting 35 firms and 187 directors. The second is a qualitative analysis of guidelines for board composition of Nasdaq Baltic-listed firms in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. The results reveal that the attributes of boards of directors do not raise concerns. Despite their relatively smaller scale in contrast to the United States or Europe, the boards of Nasdaq Baltic companies align effectively with their respective firm sizes. Notably, CEO duality is absent in Estonian and Latvian listed firms, while it is only partially evident in Lithuania. Moreover, directors’ heterogeneous professional backgrounds distinctly contribute to these boards’ overall enhancement. While the existence of board committees is strongly recommended, they are primarily implemented as a tool for controlling.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G34, O16, M12, M14
-
References33
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variables for Investigation I
- Table 2. Variables for Investigation II
- Table 3. Board characteristics of publicly listed firms in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania
- Table 4. Board composition at publicly listed firms in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania
- Table 5. Board committees at publicly listed firms in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania
- Table 6. Other occupations of directors at publicly listed firms in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania
-
- Arnegger, M., Hofmann, C., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2014). Firm size and board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 18(4), 1109-1135.
- Booth, J. R., Cornett, M. M., & Tehranian, H. (2002). Boards of directors, ownership, and regulation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(10), 1973-1996.
- Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53.
- Carter, D., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B., & Simpson, W. (2008). The diversity of corporate board committees and financial performance. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(1), 35-54.
- Elsayed, K. (2007). Does CEO duality really affect corporate performance? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1203-1214.
- European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). (2022). Diagnostic of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.
- Ferreira, D., & Kirchmaier, T. (2013). Corporate boards in Europe: Size, independence and gender diversity. In M. Belcredi & G. Ferrarini (Eds.), Boards and Shareholders in European Listed Companies: Facts, Context and Post-Crisis Reforms (pp. 191-224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- García Martín, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2018). Boards of directors: Composition and effects on the performance of the firm. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 1015-1041.
- Green, C. P., & Homroy, S. (2018). Female directors, board committees and firm performance. European Economic Review, 102, 19-38.
- Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385-404.
- Hagendorff, J., & Keasey, K. (2012). The value of board diversity in banking: Evidence from the market for corporate control. The European Journal of Finance, 18(1), 41-58.
- Hahn, P. D., & Lasfer, M. (2016). Impact of foreign directors on board meeting frequency. International Review of Financial Analysis, 46, 295-308.
- Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (2008). A theory of board control and size. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(4), 1797-1832.
- Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145-1163.
- Horváth, R., & Spirollari, P. (2012). Do the board of directors’ characteristics influence firm’s performance? The US evidence. Prague Economic Papers, 21(4), 470-486.
- Hsu, S., Lin, S.-W., Chen, W.-P., & Huang, J.-W. (2021). CEO duality, information costs, and firm performance. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 55, 101011.
- Huettinger, M. (2008). Cultural dimensions in business life: Hofstede’s indices for Latvia and Lithuania. Baltic Journal of Management, 3(3), 359-376.
- Iliev, P., & Roth, L. (2018). Learning from directors’ foreign board experiences. Journal of Corporate Finance, 51, 1-19.
- Klein, A. (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure. The Journal of Law & Economics, 41(1), 275-304.
- Konrad, A., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145-164.
- Laux, C., & Laux, V. (2009). Board committees, CEO compensation, and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 869-891.
- Lee, W.-M. (2020). The determinants and effects of board committees. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, 101747.
- Malik, M. S., & Makhdoom, D. D. (2016). Does corporate governance beget firm performance in Fortune Global 500 companies? Corporate Governance, 16(4), 747-764.
- Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing the boardroom – The effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 527-554.
- Mygind, N. (2007). The development of corporate governance in the Baltic Countries (Working Paper No. 64). CEES, Copenhagen Business School.
- Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T. (2003). The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(12), 2369-2392.
- Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404-413.
- Širaliova, J., & Angelis, J. J. (2006). Marketing strategy in the Baltics: Standardise or adapt? Baltic Journal of Management, 1(2), 169-187.
- Spira, L., & Bender, R. (2004). Compare and contrast: Perspectives on board committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 489-499.
- The European Commission. (2022, July 6). Women on boards: Deal to boost gender balance in companies (Press Release).
- Van den Berghe, L. A. A., & Levrau, A. (2004). Evaluating boards of directors: What constitutes a good corporate board? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 461-478.
- Wang, M., & Kelan, E. (2013). The gender quota and female leadership: Effects of the Norwegian gender quota on board chairs and CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(3), 449-466.