Cointegration among technological innovation, structural transformation, and development of China’s sports industry: An autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(4).2025.32
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #4, pp. 438-451
- 3 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
In the context of China’s push for high-quality economic growth, analyzing the dynamic relationships between technological innovation and structural transformation in the sports industry is crucial. This study aims to empirically examine the long-term equilibrium and short-term dynamic relationships among technological innovation, industrial structure optimization, and the development of China’s sports industry. Using provincial panel data from 2008 to 2023, this study employs the autoregressive distributed lag–error correction model (ARDL-ECM) and Granger Causality tests to analyze these interactions. Results indicate that a 1% increase in technological innovation input leads to a 0.223% rise in sports industry output, while a unit increase in the growth rate of the sports service sector boosts gross output by 0.357%. However, innovation output shows a weaker impact (0.066%), and no long-run equilibrium exists between the industrial structure ratio and economic scale. These findings underscore the need for targeted innovation policies and structural reforms. This study provides empirical support for enhancing the quality and efficiency of China’s sports industry development.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L83, O31, O14, C32
-
References28
-
Tables7
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Comovement trends between key variables
-
- Table 1. Variables and definitions
- Table 2. Variable stationarity test results (Part 1)
- Table 3. Variable stationarity test results (Part 2)
- Table 4. Long-run coefficients and error correction terms for innovation input/output and sports industry output
- Table 5. Long-run equilibrium and short-term dynamics of sports service sector growth rate and gross sports industry output in China (2008–2023)
- Table 6. Long-run equilibrium and short-term dynamics of technological innovation input, innovation output, and sports industrial structure transformation/upgrading in China (2008–2023)
- Table 7. Granger Causality results
-
- Aghion, P., David, P. A., & Foray, D. (2009). Science, technology and innovation for economic growth: Linking policy research and practice in ‘STIG Systems’. Research Policy, 38(4), 681-693.
- Balmer, N., Pleasence, P., & Nevill, A. (2012). Evolution and revolution: Gauging the impact of technological and technical innovation on Olympic performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(11), 1075-1083.
- Bilbao-Osorio, B., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2004). From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth and Change, 35(4), 434-455.
- Christensen, C. M. (2013). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. E. (2018). Disruptive innovation: An intellectual history and directions for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1043-1078.
- Dašić, G. (2023). Digital transformation in the sports industry. First International Scientific Conference Sporticopedia-SMB2023. Belgrade, Serbia.
- Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation[M]. Routledge.
- Fredberg, T., & Piller, F. T. (2011). The paradox of tie strength in customer relationships for innovation: A longitudinal case study in the sports industry. R&D Management, 41(5), 470-484.
- Gu, W., Shen, Y., Wang, S., & Zeng, C. (2017). Spatial evolution of China’s scientific and technological innovation ability and its relationship with economic development. China Science and Technology Forum, 2017(9), 1-7. (In Chinese).
- Han, Y. (2021). Research on the impact of sports technological innovation on the optimization and upgrading of China’s sports industry structure. Contemporary Sports Technology, 11(31), 1-3. (In Chinese).
- Hyysalo, S. (2009). User innovation and everyday practices: Micro-innovation in sports industry development. R&D Management, 39(3), 247-258.
- Kamien, M. I., & Schwartz, N. L. (1974). Product durability under monopoly and competition. Econometrica, 42(2), 289-301.
- Kamien, M. I., & Schwartz, N. L. (1976). On the degree of rivalry for maximum innovative activity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(2), 245-260.
- Krammer, S. M. S. (2017). Science, technology, and innovation for economic competitiveness: The role of smart specialization in less-developed countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 95-107.
- Li, X. J., & Dang, J. (2010). An empirical analysis of fiscal science and technology appropriation on economic growth: Model test based on data from Gansu Province. Gansu Social Sciences, 15, 174-178.
- Liu, F., Lu, Y., & Yu, J. (2014). On relationship between innovation achievements of science and technology and economic growth in China. Science and Technology Management Research, 2014(17), 1-8.
- Liu, J., & Wang, H. (2024). The mechanism and implementation path of accelerating the development of new quality productive forces in the sports industry. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 50(5), 1-7. (In Chinese).
- Mansfield, E. (1988). Industrial innovation in Japan and the United States. Science, 241(4874), 1767-1772.
- Marques Miragaia, D. A., Nunes Martins, C. I., Kluka, D. A., & Havens, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, social entrepreneurship and sport programs to develop social capital at community level. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 12(2), 141-154.
- Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
- Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
- Romer, P. M. (1990). Are nonconvexities important for understanding growth? American Economic Review, 80(2), 97-103.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.
- Tie, W., & Wang, T. (2012). The empirical analysis of Shaanxi Province investment for science performance in a perspective of economic growth. Statistics & Information Forum, 27(2), 73-78.
- Wu, C., & Deng, M. (2019). Technological innovation, opening to the outside world and high-quality development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Science & Technology Progress Policy, 36(3), 1-9.
- Wu, E. (2011). Cointegration analysis of influence of scientific and technological innovation on economic growth: A case of Guangdong Province. Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 4(1), 1-5.
- Yoshida, M., James, J. D., & Cronin, J. J. (2013). Sport event innovativeness: Conceptualization, measurement and its impact on consumer behavior. Sport Management Review, 16(1), 68-84.
- Zhou, Z. (2016). The impact of sci-tech innovation on industrial upgrading in Hunan Province. Economic Geography, 36(5), 1-6. (In Chinese).


