Digital transformation, organizational agility, and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam’s machinery sector
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(3).2025.25
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #3, pp. 342-357
- 29 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Firms in emerging markets are increasingly compelled to implement digital transformation strategies in response to rapid technological disruption and intensifying global competition. However, the impact of such transformation on organizational performance remains underexplored, particularly in resource-constrained contexts. This study aims to assess how digital orientation and digital capacity influence the implementation of digital transformation, and how digital transformation, in turn, affects organizational agility as well as financial and non-financial performance. Data were collected through a survey of senior managers – those directly responsible for leading digital transformation strategies – at 518 mechanical engineering enterprises in Vietnam, conducted between August and November 2024. The research model was tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results reveal that digital orientation (β = 0.585, p < 0.001) and digital capacity (β = 0.240, p < 0.001) significantly promote the adoption of digital transformation. Subsequently, digital transformation exerts a strong positive influence on organizational agility (β = 0.815, p < 0.001). In turn, organizational agility significantly enhances financial performance (β = 0.795, R² = 0.632) and non-financial performance (β = 0.536, R² = 0.287). These findings provide empirical evidence that digital transformation efforts can create practical value when they are grounded in well-aligned internal capabilities. The study contributes to clarifying how enterprises in emerging economies can align digital investments with organizational strengths to improve performance amid volatile environments.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O33, M15, L25
-
References54
-
Tables5
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Proposed research model
- Figure 2. Analysis results of the theoretical model using PLS-SEM
-
- Table 1. Structure of research sample
- Table 2. Construct reliability and validity
- Table 3. Fornell-Larcker criterion
- Table 4. Heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT)
- Table 5. Hypothesis testing results
-
- Abdurrahman, A., Gustomo, A., & Prasetio, E. A. (2024). Impact of dynamic capabilities on digital transformation and innovation to improve banking performance: A TOE framework study. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), Article 100215.
- Aboelmaged, M. (2018). The drivers of sustainable manufacturing practices in Egyptian SMEs and their impact on competitive capabilities: A PLS-SEM model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 207-221.
- Alakaş, E. Ö. (2024). Digital transformational leadership and organizational agility in digital transformation: Structural equation modelling of the moderating effects of digital culture and digital strategy. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 35(2), Article 100517.
- AlNuaimi, B. K., Kumar Singh, S., Ren, S., Budhwar, P., & Vorobyev, D. (2022). Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy. Journal of Business Research, 145, 636-648.
- AlYahya, D. (2024, September 17). Comment: Together we can end the digital divide that disenfranchises 2.6 billion people. Reuters.
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
- Andrews, L. R. J., & Luiz, J. M. (2024). Conceptualizing institutional voids in terms of severity and how the home country affects this understanding. Journal of Business Research, 176, Article 114605.
- Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
- Bindeeba, D. S., Tukamushaba, E. K., & Bakashaba, R. (2025). Digital transformation and its multidimensional impact on sustainable business performance: Evidence from a meta-analytic review. Future Business Journal, 11(1), Article 90.
- Cao, G., Duan, Y., & Edwards, J. S. (2025). Organizational culture, digital transformation, and product innovation. Information & Management, 62(4), Article 104135.
- Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024). How does business analytics contribute to organisational performance and business value? A resource-based view. Information Technology & People, 37(2), 874-894.
- Chen, C., Zhang, Y., & Wang, S. (2023). Digital transformation and firm performance: A case study on China’s listed companies in 2009–2020. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 1(1), Article 18.
- Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
- Dossi, A., & Patelli, L. (2010). You learn from what you measure: Financial and non-financial performance measures in multinational companies. Long Range Planning, 43(4), 498-526.
- Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Gawer, A., & Bonina, C. (2024). Digital platforms and development: Risks to competition and their regulatory implications in developing countries. Information and Organization, 34(3), Article 100525.
- Ghosh, S., Hughes, M., Hodgkinson, I., & Hughes, P. (2022). Digital transformation of industrial businesses: A dynamic capability approach. Technovation, 113, Article 102414.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 616-632.
- Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831-850.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135.
- International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2024). Vietnam: 2024 Article IV Consultation – Press release; staff report; and statement by the Executive Director for Vietnam (IMF Staff Country Reports No. 24/306).
- Irfan, M., Wang, M., & Akhtar, N. (2019). Impact of IT capabilities on supply chain capabilities and organizational agility: A dynamic capability view. Operations Management Research, 12(3), 113-128.
- Jain, P., Abhishek, K., & Chatterjee, P. (2024). Decision-making models and applications in manufacturing environments. CRC Press.
- Karadağ, H., Şahin, F., Karamollaoğlu, N., & Saunila, M. (2024). Disentangling the dynamic digital capability, digital transformation, and organizational performance relationships in SMEs: A configurational analysis based on fsQCA. Information Technology and Management, 26(2), 1-17.
- Khin, S., & Ho, T. C. F. (2019). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 177-195.
- Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363-380.
- Mangalaraj, G., Nerur, S., & Dwivedi, R. (2023). Digital transformation for agility and resilience: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 63(1), 11-23.
- Merín-Rodrigáñez, J., Dasí, À., & Alegre, J. (2024). Digital transformation and firm performance in innovative SMEs: The mediating role of business model innovation. Technovation, 134, Article 103027.
- Naguib, H. M., Kassem, H. M., & Naem, A. E.-H. M. A. (2024). The impact of IT governance and data governance on financial and non-financial performance. Future Business Journal, 10(1), Article 15.
- Nguyen, T., & Dang, L. T. T. (2025). Evaluating digital transformation preparedness among Vietnamese enterprises. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science-Economics And Business Administration, 15(3).
- Nosike, C. J. (2024). Digitalization in developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Nigerian Journal of Arts and Humanities (NJAH), 4(1), 343-2955.
- Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110-121.
- Oludapo, S., Carroll, N., & Helfert, M. (2024). Why do so many digital transformations fail? A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 174, Article 114528.
- Piccoli, G., Grover, V., & Rodriguez, J. (2024). Digital transformation requires digital resource primacy: Clarification and future research directions. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 33(2), Article 101835.
- Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22-40.
- Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH.
- Russ-Eft, D., Preskill, H., & Jordan, J. B. (2024). Evaluation in organizations: A systematic approach to enhancing learning, performance, and change. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Saebi, T., Lien, L., & Foss, N. J. (2017). What drives business model adaptation? The impact of opportunities, threats and strategic orientation. Long Range Planning, 50(5), 567-581.
- Saeedikiya, M., Salunke, S., & Kowalkiewicz, M. (2024). Toward a dynamic capability perspective of digital transformation in SMEs: A study of the mobility sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 439, Article 140718.
- Sumbal, M. S., Tariq, A., Amber, Q., Janovská, K., & Ferraris, A. (2024). Tech revolution unleashed: Navigating the winds of digital transformation in the fast lane. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), Article 100551.
- Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
- Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In G. Dosi, R.R. Nelson, & S. Winter (Eds.), The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford Academic.
- Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
- Truong, N. X., & Van My, D. (2023). Digital transformation in small and medium businesses in Vietnam. In P. Ordóñez de Pablos, X. Zhang, & M. Almunawar (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Management in Asia’s Digital Economy (pp. 442-465). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
- Tuyen, B. Q., Hung, T. H., & Lan, M. T. (2025). Leadership characteristics and digital transformation in an emerging market: The moderating effect of compliance pressure. International Review of Economics & Finance, 98, Article 103944.
- Van Hoang, D., Thi Hien, N., Van Thang, H., Nguyen Truc Phuong, P., & Thi-Thuy Duong, T. (2025). Digital capabilities and sustainable competitive advantages: The case of emerging market manufacturing SMEs. Sage Open, 15(2).
- Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144.
- Wang, D., & Shao, X. (2024). Research on the impact of digital transformation on the production efficiency of manufacturing enterprises: Institution-based analysis of the threshold effect. International Review of Economics & Finance, 91, 883-897.
- Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2014). Strategic agility: A state of the art introduction to the special section on strategic agility. California Management Review, 56(3), 5-12.
- Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
- White, T. (2024). Digital transformation in emerging economies provides unique opportunities for vendors. Omdia.
- World Bank. (n.d.). Viet Nam: Overview.
- Wynn, M., Bakeer, A., & Forti, Y. (2021). E-government and digital transformation in Libyan local authorities. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 12(2), 119-139.