Digitalization – CSR integration in transitional banking: Evidence from Ukraine and Kazakhstan
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.20(4).2025.20
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2025, Issue #4, pp. 256-275
- 31 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Transitional banking systems increasingly rely on both digitalization and corporate social responsibility (CSR) to sustain resilience and public trust. This study evaluates whether the integration of digital capabilities and CSR relates to bank-level trust and reputation in Ukraine and Kazakhstan. The study assembled 2019–2023 indicators for four banks – PrivatBank, Monobank (Ukraine), Kaspi.kz, and Halyk Bank (Kazakhstan) – based on publicly available information. All measures were standardized, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to construct a Digital-CSR Index (DCSI). The first principal component (PC1), which jointly loads on digital innovation, CSR, and sustainability variables, explains 54.5% of total variance and serves as the composite index; document coding achieved Krippendorff’s α = 0.82. Results show a clear rank order: Kaspi.kz = 4.48, PrivatBank = 0.88, Monobank = −0.27, and Halyk Bank = −4.07. Higher DCSI values are associated with stronger outcomes in customer trust and reputation across cases (e.g., trust levels up to 8.5/10), and descriptive fits suggest that the integrated index captures more cross-sectional variation in these outcomes than single-domain proxies. Robustness checks excluding one indicator at a time and restricting Ukrainian observations to the post-2022 period preserve the loading structure and rank order. The study concludes that integration, rather than parallel pursuit, of digitalization and CSR is associated with superior legitimacy outcomes in transitional contexts. Country conditions shape this relationship: Ukraine’s crisis-driven digital expansion is tempered by disclosure volatility, whereas Kazakhstan’s steadier assurance environment favors platformized integration. The DCSI provides a transparent, replicable benchmark to guide managerial strategy and regulatory design in comparable financial systems.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, O33, M10
-
References56
-
Tables12
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Heatmap of PCA scores for all banks
-
- Table 1. PCA eigenvalues & explained variance (PC1 = 54.5%)
- Table 2. Variable loadings on the first principal component (PC1) of the digital-CSR index
- Table 3. SWOT analysis for four banks
- Table 4. Principal component analysis (PCA) for banks
- Table 5. Explained variance of principal components
- Table 6. Variable loadings on PCs (eigenvectors)
- Table 7. Digital CSR metric for Ukraine
- Table 8. Digital CSR metric for Kazakhstan (Kaspi.kz and Halyk Bank)
- Table 9. Comparative digital CSR metric
- Table 10. Standardized scores for Kaspi.kz
- Table 11. Summary of standardized variables and Digital-CSR Index Scores
- Table A1. Digital-CSR index construction – Data dictionary and PCA variable matrix
-
- Adambekova, A., Adambekov, N., Randhir, T. O., Adambekova, Z., & Yezhebekov, M. (2024). Microcrediting and investment analysis in the context of environmental, social, and corporate governance. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(11), Article 484.
- Ambrosio, T., Hall, S. G., & Obydenkova, A. (2022). Sustainable development agendas of regional international organizations: The European Bank of Reconstruction and Development and the Eurasian Development Bank. Problems of Post-Communism, 69(4-5), 304-316.
- Artemchuk, M., Marukhlenko, O., Sokrovolska, N., Mazur, H., & Riznyk, D. (2024). The impact of economic recession on the financial support of state functions during crisis situations. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, 15(2), 350.
- Attié, E., & Meyer-Waarden, L. (2022). The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: An enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy calculus theories. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, Article 121485.
- Berger, M. L., Mamdani, M., Atkins, D., & Johnson, M. L. (2009). Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report – Part I. Value in Health, 12(8), 1044-1052.
- Bezrukova, N., Huk, L., Chmil, H., Verbivska, L., Komchatnykh, O., & Kozlovskyi, Y. (2022). Digitalization as a trend of modern development of the world economy. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 18, 120-129.
- Bijlmakers, S. (2022). No ISO fix for human rights: A critical perspective on ISO 26000 guidance on social responsibility. In Morrell, J. E., & Schwartz, M. A. (Eds.), Research handbook on global governance, business and human rights (pp. 205-228). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Chen, Y., Visnjic, I., Parida, V., & Zhang, Z. (2021). On the road to digital servitization-The (dis)continuous interplay between business model and digital technology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(5), 694-722.
- Chin, T., Jin, J., Wang, S., Caputo, F., & Rowley, C. (2023). Cross-cultural legitimacy for orchestrating ecosystem-based business models in China: A Yin-Yang dialectical systems view. Asia Pacific Business Review, 1-24.
- Citaristi, I. (2022). European Bank for Reconstruction and Development – EBRD. In The Europa directory of international organizations 2022 (pp. 555-559). Routledge.
- Derevyanko, B., Zozulia, Y., & Rudenko, L. (2017). Money assets of internally displaced persons are financial resources for commercial banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 12(4), 211-217.
- Dykha, M. V., Tanasiienko, N. P., & Kolisnyk, G. M. (2017). Ensuring of labor productivity growth in the context of investment and innovation activity intensification. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(4), 197-208.
- Fatima, T., & Elbanna, S. (2023). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) implementation: A review and a research agenda towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(1), 105-121.
- Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1757-1770.
- Giannopoulos, G., Pilcher, N., & Salmon, I. (2024). What is the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in the UK banking sector? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(5), Article 187.
- Halkos, G., & Nomikos, S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 106-117.
- Hanic, A., & Smolo, E. (2023). Islamic approach to corporate social responsibility: An international model for Islamic banks. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 16(1), 175-191.
- Häußermann, J. J., Maier, M. J., Kirsch, T. C., Kaiser, S., & Schraudner, M. (2023). Social acceptance of green hydrogen in Germany: Building trust through responsible innovation. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 13(1), Article 22.
- Hmiden, O. B., Tatoutchoup, D., Nguimkeu, P., & Avelé, D. (2024). Discrepancy and cross-regional bias in sovereign credit ratings: Analyzing the role of public debt. Economic Modelling, 131, Article 106600.
- Hryhoriev, Y., Lutsenko, S., Shvets, Y., Kuttybayev, A., & Mukhamedyarova, N. (2024). Predictive calculation of blasting quality as a tool for estimation of production cost and investment attractiveness of a mineral deposit development. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1415, No. 1, p. 012027). IOP Publishing.
- Hughes, A., Urban, M. A., & Wójcik, D. (2021). Alternative ESG ratings: How technological innovation is reshaping sustainable investment. Sustainability, 13(6), Article 3551.
- Ionașcu, A. E., Gheorghiu, G., Spătariu, E. C., Munteanu, I., Grigorescu, A., & Dănilă, A. (2023). Unraveling digital transformation in banking: Evidence from Romania. Systems, 11(11), Article 534.
- Jolliffe, I. (2011). Principal component analysis. In M. Lovric (Ed.), International encyclopedia of statistical science (pp. 1094-1096). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Kaluarachchi, B. N., & Sedera, D. (2024). Improving efficiency through AI-powered customer engagement by providing personalized solutions in the banking industry. In Sethi, S. P. (Ed.), Integrating AI-driven technologies into service marketing (pp. 299-342). IGI Global.
- Kasradze, T., & Machkhashvili, S. (2024). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the financial performance of Georgian banks. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 11(6), 1001-1016.
- Kobets, K., Тerentieva, N., Shkvyria, N., Lysytsia, N., & Siemak, I. (2024). Digitalization and its impact on the development of contemporary marketing strategies. Economic Affairs, 69(2), 1021-1040.
- Kolodii, R. (2024). The pedagogy of cyber-war: Explaining Ukraine’s resilience against Russian cyber-aggression. Defense & Security Analysis, 40(2), 270-291.
- Krippendorff, K. (2022). The reliability of generating data. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
- Kryvovyazyuk, I., Vakhovych, I., Kaminska, I., & Dorosh, V. (2020). Managerial innovations in methodology of solving export-import activity problems and ensuring international corporations’ business excellence. Quality - Access to Success, 21(178), 50-55.
- Kulikov, P., Aziukovskyi, O., Vahonova, O., Bondar, O., Akimova, L., & Akimov, O. (2022). Post-war economy of Ukraine: Innovation and investment development project. Economic Affairs, 67(5), 365-372.
- Liang, L., Ding, T., Tan, R., & Song, M. (2025). International ESG standards and frameworks. In The ESG systems in Chinese enterprises: Theory and practice (pp. 25-61). Springer Nature Singapore.
- Malik, S., Chadhar, M., Vatanasakdakul, S., & Chetty, M. (2021). Factors affecting the organizational adoption of blockchain technology: Extending the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework in the Australian context. Sustainability, 13(16), Article 9404.
- Maranzano, P., & Romano, R. (2025). The European economic transition before, during, and after the pandemic through the war in Ukraine. Forum for Social Economics, 54(1), 114-140.
- Mbatha, B. (2024). Diffusion of Innovations: How Adoption of New Technology Spreads in Society. In Ocholla, D., Onyancha, O. B., & Adesina, A. O. (Eds.), Information, Knowledge, and Technology for Teaching and Research in Africa (pp. 1-18). Springer Nature Switzerland.
- Nanda, A., Xu, Y., & Zhang, F. (2021). How would the COVID-19 pandemic reshape retail real estate and high streets through acceleration of e-commerce and digitalization? Journal of Urban Management, 10(2), 110-124.
- Ngamvilaikorn, K., Lhaopadchan, S., & Treepongkaruna, S. (2024). Corporate governance, social responsibility and sustainability commitments by banks: Impacts on credit risk and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 5109-5121.
- Omarini, A. (2023). Shifting paradigms in banking: How new service concepts and formats enhance the value of financial services. In Walker, T., Nikbakht, E., & Kooli, M. (Eds.), The fintech disruption: How financial innovation is transforming the banking industry (pp. 75-113). Springer International Publishing.
- Parente, R., Rong, K., Geleilate, J. M. G., & Misati, E. (2019). Adapting and sustaining operations in weak institutional environments: A business ecosystem assessment of a Chinese MNE in Central Africa. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 275-291.
- Pellicciari, I. (2022). Aid in war or aid to war? Foreign aid in the 2022 war in Ukraine. The Review of International Affairs, 73(1186), 61-78.
- Potocan, V. (2021). Technology and corporate social responsibility. Sustainability, 13(15), Article 8658.
- Prokopenko, O. (2021). Internet banking market of the future: Formation and development. Futurity Economics & Law, 1(1), 23-28.
- Schinckus, C. (2021). Proof-of-work based blockchain technology and Anthropocene: An undermined situation? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 152, Article 111682.
- Shah, S. S. (2024). Financial inclusion and digital banking: Current trends and future directions. Premier Journal of Business and Management, 1, Article 100002.
- Shah, S. S. (2025). Culture and individual attitudes towards responsible consumption. Journal of Islamic Marketing.
- Shah, S. S., & Shah, T. (2023). Responsible consumption choices and individual values: An algebraic interactive approach. Mind & Society, 22(1), 1-32.
- Shapovalova, A., Prokopova, O., Kuzmenko, O., Saienko, V., & Lazebnek, L. (2023). Taxation and economic growth in transition economies. Review of Economics and Finance, 21(1), 776-782.
- Sucre, A., Consuegra, D., & Mitre, M. (2025). Challenges and Opportunities in the Panamanian Digital Economy: A Systematic Review of the Future. Diginomics, 4, 285.
- Theiri, S., & Alareeni, B. (2023). Perception of the digital transformation as a strategic advantage through the COVID-19 crisis? Case of Tunisian banks. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(1), 477-498.
- Truby, J., Brown, R., & Dahdal, A. (2020). Banking on AI: Mandating a proactive approach to AI regulation in the financial sector. Law and Financial Markets Review, 14(2), 110-120.
- Tumalavičius, V. (2022). Legal challenges for blockchain projects and cryptocurrencies in the context of sustainable development: International virtual currency market and technology dynamics. Law, Business and Sustainability Herald, 2(3), 27-41.
- Van Veldhoven, Z., & Vanthienen, J. (2022). Digital transformation as an interaction-driven perspective between business, society, and technology. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 629-644.
- Verbivska, L., Zhuk, O., Yevsieieva, O., Kuchmiova, T., & Saienko, V. (2023). The role of e-commerce in stimulating innovative business development in the context of European integration. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(50), 330-340.
- Viardot, E., Brem, A., & Nylund, P. A. (2023). Post-pandemic implications for crisis innovation: A technological innovation view. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, Article 122680.
- Zayukov, I., Mazur, H., Kozlovskyi, S., Lavrov, R., & Matsyuk, V. (2024). The Influence of the Net Financial Result of the Activities of the State Enterprises of Ukraine on the Efficiency of the Use of their Capital in the Corporate Management System. European Journal of Economics and Management, 10(1), 15-25.
- Zozulov, O., Hrynko, P., & Hrynko, I. (2023). Marketing technology in the context of digitalization: Features and trends in Ukraine. Economic Alternatives, 2023(2), 223-238.
- Zuboff, S. (2019). Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action. New Labor Forum, 28(1), 10-29.


