Financial performance-based assessment of companies’ competitiveness: Evidence from the Norwegian Shipbuilding Industry
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(3).2023.12
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2023, Issue #3, pp. 137-151
- 406 Views
-
208 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The Norwegian maritime industry is at the forefront of green technology development, with shipyards playing a crucial role in testing, verification, and development. However, the industry faces challenges such as high personal costs, increasing competition from abroad, and cyclical market trends. This study aims to assess financial performance as indicator of firm-level competitiveness based on a set of 12 financial measures and test the hypothesis of the positive impact of portfolio diversification on shipyards’ competitiveness.
The analysis utilizes data from four large construction yards and four medium-sized construction, repair, and maintenance yards in the Møre region. The methodology involves constructing a Shipyard Competitiveness Index with sub-indices for liquidity, profitability, solvency, and efficiency. Regression analysis is conducted to investigate the impact of ship variety, as a diversification parameter, on the competitiveness level.
The obtained results reveal that during the analyzed period (2009–2020), companies in the group of large shipyards had better financial performance until 2017, while on the contrary, the second group of shipyards in the same period showed an increase in their competitiveness index. Moreover, the findings proved the presence of the positive relationship between diversification of portfolio and competitiveness index.
This study contributes valuable insights for the Norwegian shipbuilding industry, highlighting the importance of financial performance assessment in measuring competitiveness. The study provides a foundation for future discussions on fostering sustainable growth and innovation within the maritime sector.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G11, L20, L25
-
References37
-
Tables2
-
Figures8
-
- Figure 1. Shipbuilding direct and reverse value chain
- Figure 2. The companies’ cycle and transitional growth phases
- Figure 3. Framework of the study on the relationship between the competitiveness of shipyards and diversification as a strategy
- Figure 4. Profitability and solvency of the large shipyards during 2009–2020
- Figure 5. Liquidity and efficiency of large shipyards during 2009–2020
- Figure 6. Shipyard Competitiveness Index: group I (left diagram) and group II (right diagram), 2009–2020
- Figure 7. Average Shipyard Competitiveness Index, 2009–2020
- Figure 8. Offshore ship building percentage by shipyards, 2009–2020
-
- Table 1. Results of ordinary least square (OLS) regression analysis based on the first model
- Table 2. Results of ordinary least square (OLS) regression analysis based on the second model
-
- Berger, T. (2008). Concepts on National Competitiveness. Journal of International Business and Economy, 9(1), 3-17.
- Black, J., Hashimzade, N., & Myles, G. (2009). A Dictionary of Economics. Oxford University Press. National Library of Lithuania [cited 10 March 2010].
- Brønnøysundregistrene. (2023). Companies’ consolidated financial statements.
- Calvosa, P. (2021). The Life Cycle of Converging Industries: The Evolution of the Tablet Sector and Its Impact on Competitive Dynamics. International Journal of Business and Management, 16(11), 76-91.
- Cao, Y. (2009). Thoughts on Enterprise Diversification and Specialization Strategy Selection – Based on the Analysis of Enterprise Resource Capability Theory. Reformation and Strategy, 25, 46-49.
- Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford UK: Blackwell Publishers.
- Ecorys. (2019). Study on Competitiveness of the European Shipbuilding Industry Within the Framework Contract of Sectoral Competitiveness Studies – ENTR/06/054 (Final report).
- Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
- Gasparotti, C. R. (2014). Prediction of the dynamic responses for two containerships operating in the Black Sea. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering (JNAME), 55-68.
- Gasparotti, Carmen (2018). An overview on the shipbuilding market in current period and forecast.
- Gort, M. (1962). Diversification and Integration in America. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
- Grant, R. M. (1991a). Porter’s “Competitive Advantage of Nations”: An Assessment. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 535-548.
- Grant, R. M. (1991b). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
- Grillitsch, M., & Asheim, B. (2018). Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions. European Planning Studies, 26(8), 1638-1662.
- Grytten, O. H. (2020). Two centuries of economic growth: Norwegian GDP 1816–2020 (NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper No. 10/2020). Bergen.
- Koilo V., & Grytten O. H. (2019). Maritime financial instability and supply chain management effects. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4), 62-79.
- Koilo, V. (2019). Financial performance under stress: the case of the Norwegian maritime cluster. Public and Municipal Finance, 8(1), 54-72.
- Langlois, R., & Robertson, P. (1996). Stop Crying over Spilt Knowledge: A Critical Look at the Theory of Spillovers and Technical Change (University of Connecticut Department of Economics Working Paper Series. Connecticut).
- Maritimt Magasin. (2023). The order list for Norwegian shipyard.
- Menon. (2021a). Norske skipsverft – aktivitet, konkurransesituasjon og rammebetingelser (Menon-publikasjon nr. 66/2021). Lars Martin Haugland, Serli Abrahamoglu, Øyvind Berle, Anders Helseth, Erik Jakobsen og Erik Nyheim. (In Norvegian).
- Menzel, M. P., & Fornahl, D. (2010). Cluster life cycles – dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(1), 205-238.
- Mosway. (n.d.). Shipbuilding Cycles: Lessons from the Past?
- Papademos, L. (2003). Economic Cycles and Monetary Policy. International Symposium of the Banque de France on “Monetary Policy, the Economic Cycle and Financial Dynamics”. Paris.
- Porter, M. (1998). Systems of innovation: growth, competitiveness, and employment. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
- Porter, M. E. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264, 168.
- Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15-34.
- Proof (2023). Companies consolidated financial statements. The Business Finder.
- Reve, T. (2007). 15 år med klyngestudier – hva har vi lært? I O.R. Spilling (red.), Kunnskap, næringsutvikling og innovasjonspolitikk (s. 43-68). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. (In Norvegian).
- Ricardo, D. 1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. London: John Murray,
- Rusu, E. A. (2011). Wave modelling at the entrance of ports. Ocean Engineering, 38(17), 2089-2109.
- Sindhu, M. I., Ul-Haq, E., & Ali, S. (2014). Impact of Diversification on the Firm’s Performance:An Evidence from Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Management, 6, 106-114.
- Sjøtun, S. G., & Njøs, R. (2019). Geen reorientation of clusters and the role of policy: ‘The normative’ and ‘the neutral’ route. European Planning Studies, 27(12), 2411-2430.
- Sledge, S. (2005). Does Porter’s Diamond Hold in The Global Automotive Industry? Advances in Competitiveness Research (ACR), 13(1), 22-32. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 341-365.
- Smith, S. (1995). World-Class Competitiveness. Managing Service Quality, 5(5), 36-42.
- Törnqvist, G. (1997). Människa, teknik och territorium. Stockholm: NordREFO. (In Norvegian).
- Tyson, L. A. (1992). Who’s Bashing Whom? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
- Vard. (2021). SUMMARY REPORT Offshore Circular Economy for GRØNT SKIPSFART PROGRAM.