Harmony between culture, work style, work preferences, mental health, and performance of Generation Z
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(1).2026.51
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #1, pp. 791-805
- 11 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The entry of Generation Z into organizations brings new expectations regarding how performance is defined in the workplace. Performance is no longer assessed solely on results, but also on alignment with values, psychological well-being, and preferences, thus requiring adjustments in performance management practices. This study aims to analyze the influence of employee preferences, work styles, organizational culture, and mental health on the performance of Generation Z employees in startup companies. A quantitative approach was employed using primary data collected through questionnaires distributed to 160 Generation Z employees working in startup companies in Medan City, Indonesia, selected through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) to test both direct and indirect relationships. The results show that work preferences (p = 0.000), work style (p = 0.002), and organizational culture (p = 0.000) have a positive and significant effect on the performance of Generation Z. In addition, work preferences (p = 0.000), work style (p = 0.000), and organizational culture (p = 0.008) also have a significant effect on mental health, while mental health has a significant effect on performance (p = 0.004). Mental health was found to mediate the influence of work preferences (p = 0.017) and work style (p = 0.018) on performance but did not mediate the influence of organizational culture on performance (p = 0.058). This study contributes novelty by demonstrating that mental health functions as a selective mediator in shaping Generation Z performance in startup settings, thereby enriching theoretical perspectives on young employee performance formation.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)J24, M12, M14, M54, O15
-
References45
-
Tables5
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research framework
- Figure 2. Structural model
-
- Table 1. Participants’ overview
- Table 2. Discriminant validity
- Table 3. Multicollinearity testing
- Table 4. Hypotheses testing
- Table A1. Factor loadings, path coefficient (α) values, rho A reliability, composite reliability (CR), and average variance extracted (AVE)
-
- Abdullaeva, M. S. (2020). Woman in the labor market: Uzbekistan and world practice. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(7si), 2138-2144.
- Agarwal, S., Agrawal, V., & Dixit, J. K. (2023). Exploration of factors for promoting women-owned digital enterprises: A conceptual viewpoint. International Journal of Business Excellence, 29(4), 581-599.
- Al Montaser, M., Masha, M., Sujana, S., Al-Hareth, M.A.H., Al-Mubaideen, M.A., & Khaled, A. (2025). Trends in employee performance: A comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis using Scopus and WOS. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(1).
- Al-Twal, A., Jarrar, D. M. F., Bedevian, V., & Eblan, M. (2025). Unlocking potential: Examining Generation Z’s vision for career growth in the Jordanian context. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(2), 4419-4443.
- Annisa, Sri., Siahaan, Elisabet., Lumbanraja, Prihatin & Absah, Yeni. (2025). Improving employee performance by building stress management among banking employees. Banks and Bank Systems, 20(4), 87-99.
- Ariani, D. W. (2023). Exploring relationship of job satisfaction, organizational culture, and employee performance in small medium enterprise. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(2).
- Bou Hatoum, M., & Nassereddine, H. (2025). Becoming an employer of choice for Generation Z in the construction industry. Buildings, 15(2).
- Chen, B., Wang, L., Li, B., & Liu, W. (2022). Work stress, mental health, and employee performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1006580.
- Choudhury, S., Dutta, M. G., Routray, P., & Dash, A. K. (2024). Organizational factors affecting innovative HR practices and systems: A way to creating the new Gen workplace. In The Role of HR in the Transforming Workplace: Challenges, Technology, and Future Directions (pp. 133-150). Springer.
- de Gennaro, D., Mormile, S., Piscopo, G., & Adinolfi, P. (2023). In the jungle, the mighty jungle, the zebras are teal tonight: Investigating the organizational forms of Generation Z-driven Italian start-ups. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 30(6), 1129-1155.
- Demircan, M. L., & Ersoy, M. M. (2024). A study on detecting prioritized employee engagement areas affecting corporate culture sustainability from the Generation-Z workforce perspective using intuitionistic fuzzy set extensions. In C. Kahraman, S. Cevik Onar, S. Cebi, B. Oztaysi, A.C. Tolga, & I. Ucal Sari (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (pp. 559-566). Cham: Springer.
- Dieguez, T., Loureiro, P., & Ferreira, I. (2024). The gap between the expectations of Gen Z and organizations in Industry 4.0. In 2024 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV 2024) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
- Dwidienawati, D., Jatmiko, L. A., Dewanti, R. N., & Gandasari, D. (2024). Organization culture and employee experience: Do they affect job satisfaction and turnover intention? WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 21(1), 73-82.
- Febriana, A., & Mujib, M. (2024). Increasing productivity of Gen Z employees: The role of flexible work arrangements and participative style. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(1).
- Gabrielsson, J., & Winlund, H. (2010). Boards of directors in small and medium-sized industrial firms: Examining the effects of the board’s working style on board task performance. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(4), 311-330.
- Goryunova, E., & Jenkins, D. (2023). Digital natives: Shaping the future of leadership–followership dyad worldwide. In Handbook of Global Leadership and Followership: Integrating the Best Leadership Theory and Practice.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A workbook. Springer.
- Harlianto, J., Prabowo, H., Hamsal, M., & Simatupang, B. (2024). Technological, physical and cultural strategies for Generation X and Y toward their performance. In M. Busu (Ed.), Rethinking Business for Sustainable Leadership in a VUCA World (pp. 193-207). Springer.
- Hasan, H. (2023). Effect of organizational culture on organizational learning, employee engagement, and employee performance: Study of banking employees in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(3), 471-482.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2023). The fourth turning: An American prophecy. Broadway Books.
- Huang, Z., Choi, D.-H., Lai, B., Lu, Z., & Tian, H. (2022). Metaverse-based virtual reality experience and resilience performance in the sports economy: The mediating role of mental health and performance anxiety. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 991489.
- Jayathilake, H. D., Daud, D., Eaw, H. C., & Annuar, N. (2021). Employee development and retention of Generation-Z employees in the post-COVID-19 workplace: A conceptual framework. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(7), 2343-2364.
- José, R., Palma-Moreira, J., & Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2025). Organizational culture and perceived performance: Mediation of perceived organizational support and moderation of motivation. Administrative Sciences, 15(8).
- Kang, E., & Lee, H. (2021). Employee compensation strategy as sustainable competitive advantage for HR education practitioners. Sustainability, 13(3).
- Katsaros, K. (2024). Gen Z employee adaptive performance: The role of inclusive leadership and workplace happiness. Administrative Sciences, 14(8).
- Kozák, M. (2020). What matters in a job? A multi-level study of job preference orientations and the intrinsic quality of work in 25 societies. Societies, 10(3).
- Lu, X., Yu, H., & Shan, B. (2022). Relationship between employee mental health and job performance: Mediation role of innovative behavior and work engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11).
- Mabaso, C. (2025). Reward preferences to attract and retain Generation Z. Acta Commercii, 25(1).
- Mosharrafa, R. A., Nazmunnahar, M. A. B. Kh, & Islam, Md. (2024). Evaluation of mental health problems and psychological burnout among the bankers in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 80(4), 1640-1652.
- Moslehpour, M., Altantsetseg, P., Mou, W., & Wong, W.-K. (2019). Organizational climate and work style: The missing links for sustainability of leadership and satisfied employees. Sustainability, 11(1).
- Nakash, M. (2024). More money and less diversity: What is the ideal workplace according to the Gen-Z perception? Proceedings of the European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance, 20(1), 723-726.
- Nguyen, T. N., Mai, D. V., & Vu, A. T. (2024). Study of factors influencing the organizational commitment of Generation Z working in the IT sector of Vietnam. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(7).
- Nguyen, T. T. Q., Tran, N. G., & Nguyen, T. T. (2023). Social capital and digital transformation of startups in Vietnam during the Covid-19 pandemic: The mediating role of human capital and access to resources. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 31(1), 33-42.
- Nieżurawska, J., Kycia, R. A., & Niemczynowicz, A. (2023). Preface. In Managing Generation Z: Motivation, Engagement and Loyalty (pp. v-viii). Springer.
- Osorio, M. L., & Madero, S. (2025). Explaining Gen Z’s desire for hybrid work in corporate, family, and entrepreneurial settings. Business Horizons, 68(3), 83-93.
- Rahim, M. F. B. A., & Hashim, R. B. C. (2024). New generation demands flexibility: Are we ready? Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(2).
- Rumijati, A., Novianti, K. R., Arifiani, R. S., Wurianto, A. B., & Fadhilah, N. (2025). Work flexibility and work-life balance: Exploring the moderating role of resilience in Generation Z and Millennial. Jurnal Fokus Manajemen Bisnis, 15(2), 184-198.
- Saritha, T., & Akthar, P. (2024). The impact of hybrid work models on employee well-being and engagement. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis, 31(5s).
- Sudaryono. (2023). Research methodology: Quantitative, qualitative, and mix methods. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
- Tang, C. S.-K., Chow, T. S., Lui, W. K., Yuen, W. W. Y., & Ngai, J. T. K. (2026). Generational analyses of prevalence, relative risks and protective factors of anxiety and depression symptoms among adult Chinese in Hong Kong. Journal of Affective Disorders, 393(Part A), Article 120359.
- Waworuntu, E. C., Kainde, S. J. R., & Mandagi, D. W. (2022). Work-Life Balance, Job Satisfaction and Performance Among Millennial and Gen Z Employees: A Systematic Review. Society, 10(2), 384-398.
- Yada, S., & Kurahashi, S. (2021). Relationship between performance and work style extracted from location data. In G. Jezic, J. Chen-Burger, M. Kusek, R. Sperka, R.J. Howlett, & L.C. Jain (Eds.), Agents and multi-agent systems: Technologies and applications 2021 (pp. 299-309). Cham: Springer.
- Zain, K. N., Ardiansyah, R. P., & Fachrunnisa, O. (2025). Bridging generations: Aligning HRM with Generation Z’s expectations for organizational success – A systematic literature review. In L. Barolli, T. Enokido, & I. Woungang (Eds.), Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (pp. 131-143). Cham: Springer.


