Market, state and business in coordinates of the new economy
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(3).2017.07
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2017, Issue #3, pp. 76-97
- Cited by
- 1019 Views
-
214 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The formation of the new economy, which is replacing the industrial economy and has a multi-vector dimension1, causes deep transformations in all spheres of social existence, leads to the emergence of new forms and methods for organizing interactions between institutions that function in the area of socio-economic development. The relevance of the study is caused by the necessity of theoretical and applied substantiation of the new subjective composition and network interaction of these institutions. The scientific and practical significance of the research is to substantiate the formation and development of modern institutions and to establish a new format for their interaction within the framework of the new economy. The results of the study are aimed at identifying the latest trends in the modernization of institutes’ functions in the triad “market – state – business”. The subject of the study is the theoretical and applied principles of the social phenomenon “market – state – business”. The methodological basis for achieving this goal is systematic and interdisciplinary approaches to the study of redistribution of roles among these institutions and the improvement of their interaction in the process of ensuring sustainable development. The purpose of the research is a scientific and theoretical substantiation of the new configuration of the social phenomenon “market – state – business”. The principal position of the authors is their belief that a new interpretation should be given if not to all, but to the majority of categories and concepts that reflect the phenomena and processes occurring in the chain “market – state – business”. There is a need for a new, unorthodox, unconventional understanding of most of the phenomena and processes associated with the functioning of the leading institutions of the economy and society. The article presents the authors’ view on the contemporary role of each of the mentioned institutions, their interaction in the process of ensuring sustainable development. Particular attention is paid to the substantiation of the transformation of functions of the state and business under the current conditions. The authors demonstrate that the contemporary role and place of the leading institutions, which have to ensure sustainable development, need a new understanding.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D210, Н110
-
References47
-
Tables2
-
Figures0
-
- Table1. Social Expenditures in OECD Countries, % of GDP
- Table 2. The structure of state expenditures in OECD countries according to functions, 2011, %
-
- Are State-Owned Enterprises Emerging to Become Serious Competitors? News Blaze, 17.03.2012.
- Bell, D. (1976). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books, 507.
- Bergin, E., Kuryaev, A. V. (Ed.). (2017). Великая революция идеи : возрождение свободных рынков после Великой депрессии [Velikaya revolutsiya idei: vozrozhdenie svobodnykh rynkov posle Velikoi depressii]. Moskva: Mysl, 328 p.
- Budäus, D.; Grüb, B. (2008). Public Private Partnership. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, Seite 586-590.
- Christensen, B. (2001). Qualifikationsan for derungen und Arbeitsformen in der Neuen Okonomie. Kieler Arbeitspapier, 1081,60.
- Coelho, P. (2008). Мактуб [Maktub]. Moskva: AST: Astrel, 292 p.
- Crouch, C. (2011). Thestrangenon-deathofneoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 224
- Darendorf, R. (1964). Недавние изменения в классовой структуре современной Европы [Nedavnie izmeneniya v klasovoi structure sovremennoi Evropy]. Moskva: Akademiya, 180 p.
- Economics for the Curious (2014). In side the Minds of 12 Nobel Laureates. By Robert M. Solow (Editor). Chicago and London. The University of Chicago Press, 206.
- Elianov, A. (1998). Государство в системе догоняющего развития [Gosudarstvo v sisteme dogoniauschego razvitiya]. MEiMO, 3, 60-63.
- Fligstein, N. (2001). The Architecture of Markets: an Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 274.
- Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life, 404.
- Gates, B. (1996). Дорога в будущее [Doroga v buduschee]. Moskva: Izd. otd. “Rus. red.” TOO “Channel Trading Ltd.”, 312 p.
- Grinberg, R. S. (2012). Свобода и справедливость. Российские соблазны ложного выбора [Svoboda i spravedlivost. Rossiyskie soblazny lozhnogo vybora]. Moskva: magistr: INFRA-M, 416 p.
- Gritsenko, A. A. (2014). Искать адекватные ответы на вызовы информационно-сетевой экономики [Iskat adekvatnye otvety na vyzovy informatsionno-setevoi ekonomiki]. In Grinberg, R. S., Babkin, K. A., Buzgalin, A. V. (Eds.), Экономика для человека; социально-ориентированное развитие на основе прогресса реального сектора. Материалы Московского экономического форума [Ekonomika dlia cheloveka; sotsialno-orientirovannoe razvitie na osnove progressa realnogo sektora. Materialy Moskovskogo ekonomicheskogo foruma] (pp. 92-98). Moskva: Kulturnaya revolutsiya.
- Halchynskyi, A. (2010). Економічна методологія. Логіка оновлення: курс лекцій [Ekonomichna metodolohiia. Lohika onovlennia: kurs lektsii]. Kyiv: ADEF – Ukraina, 566 p.
- Hnybidenko, I. F., Kolot, A. M., Rohovyi, V. V. (Eds.), Novikov, O. F. et al. (2006). Соціальна безпека: теорія та українська практика : монографія [Sotsialna bezpeka: teoriia ta ukrainska praktyka]. Kyiv: KNEU, 292 p.
- Hodson, W. (1993). Intellectual Capital. How to Build. It, Enhance It, Use It. N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
- Kahn, H., Wiener, A. (1967). The Year 2000. A Framework for Speculation on the Next 33 Years. L., 431.
- Kastels, M. (2000). Информационная эпоха: экономика, общество и культура [Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obschestvo i kultura]. Moskva: GU VSHE, 608 p.
- Kheilbroner, R. (1973). Экономические проблемы постиндустриального общества [Ekonomicheskie problem postindustrialnogo obschestva]. Moskva, 205 p.
- Klodt, H. (2003). Die neue Ökonomie: Erscheinungsformen, Ursachen und Auswirkungen. Eine Heinz Nixdorf Stud, 248 p.
- Kolot, A. M. (2012). Asymmetries in Social Labour Sector Development: Manifestations, Causes and for Overcoming, Actual Problems of Economics, 6(132), pp. 205-211.
- Kolot, A. M. (2011). Еволюція ролі держави та інструментарію її впливу на розвиток соціально-трудової сфери [Evolutsiia roli derzhavy ta instrumentariiu ii vplyvu na rozvytok sotsialno-trudovoi sfery]. In A. M. Kolot, Sotsialno-trudovi vidnosyny: teoriia ta praktyka. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats (pp. 122-142). Kyiv: KNEU.
- Kolot, A. M. (2013). Корпоративна соціальна відповідальність: еволюція та розвиток теоретичних поглядів [Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist: evolutsiia ta rozvytok teoretychnykh pohliadiv]. Ekonomichna teoriia, 4, 5-26.
- Kolot, A. M. (2014). Розвиток наук про працю та соціально-трудові відносини на засадах міждисциплінарності [Rozvytok nauk pro pratsiu ta sotsialno-trudovi vidnosyny na zasadakh mizhdystsyplinarnosti]. Sotsialno-trudovi vidnosyny: teoriia ta praktyka, 1, 2, 7-27, 7-26.
- Kolot, A. M. (Ed.), Hrishnova, O. A. et al. (2012). Соціальна відповідальність: теорія і практика розвитку: монографія [Sotsialna vidpovidalnist: teoriia i praktyka rozvytku] Kyiv: KNEU, 501 p.
- Kolot, A. M., Gerasymenko, O. O., Poplavska, O. M. (2017). До формування нової моделі соціальної держави [Do formuvannia novoi modeli sotsialnoi derzhavy]. Ukraina: aspekty pratsi, 1-2, 3-15.
- Kolot, A. M., Kravchuk, O. I. (2015). Людина і нова економіка: теоретико-методологічний аналіз взаємодії та домінант розвитку [Ludyna i nova ekonomika: teoretyko-metodolohichnyi analiz vzaemodii ta dominant rozvytku]. Ekonomichna teoriia, 1, 5-25.
- Kolot, A. M., Poplavska, O. M. (2016). Держава і бізнес: новітні тенденції взаємодії та забезпечення стійкого розвитку [Derzhava i biznes: novitni tendetsii vzaiemodii ta zabezpechennia stiikoho rozvytku]. Sotsialno-trudovi vidnosyny: teoriia ta praktyka, 2, 8-15.
- Kreibich, R. (1986).Die Wissenschaftsgeselsch von Galilei zur High-Tech-Revolution. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 804.
- Masahiko, A. (2010). Corporations in Evolving Diversity. Cognition, Governance, and Institutions. Oxford University Press, 232.
- Mises, L. (1985). Omnipotent Government: The Rise of Total State and Total War. Libertarian Press, 291.
- Mises, L. (2009). Socialism: an Economic and Sociological Analysis. Auburn, 596.
- Niiniluoto, І. (2003). Philosophy in Finland – the Cultural Setting. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. Analytic Philosophy in Finland, 80, 11-41.
- Perkin, H. (1996). Third Revolution: Professional Elites in the Modern World. L.A., N. Y.: Routledge, 272.
- Quiggin, J. (2012). Zombie Economics: How Dead Ideas Still Walk among Us, 288.
- Reinert Erik, S. (2017). Спонтанный хаос. Экономика эпохи рецессии [Spontannyy khaos. Ekonomika epokhi retsessii]. Moskva: Politicheskaya entsyklopediya, 190 p.
- Samuelson, Paul Anthony. (2010). Economics. Paul A. Samuelson, William D. Nordhaus, 19th, Boston : McGraw-Hill Irwin. The McGraw-Hill series economics, 403.
- Schwab, K. (2015). Business in a Changing World: Stewarding the Future. Foreign Affairs. Tuesday, 06.01.2015.
- Shaiken, H. (1985). Work Transformed. Automation and Labour in the Computer Age. N. Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 306.
- Stigler, G. (1961). The Economics of Information. Journal of Political Economy, 69, 213-225.
- Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. NY : Morrow.
- Toffler, E. (2008). Шок будущего [Shok buduschego]. Moskva: AST, 560 p.
- Werner, H. (1999). Public Private Partnership Chapter Kommunal politik, 552-570.
- World Investment Report, 2011, p. 30.
- Zimenenkov, R. I., Zavyalova, E. B. (2016). Сотрудничество американского государства и бизнеса в решении социальных проблем [Sotrudnichestvo amerikanskogo gosudarstva i biznesa v reshenii sotsyalnykh problem]. США, Канада: экономика, политика, культура [SSHA, Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kultura], 2, 50-60.