Study on system fairness dimensions and tax compliance in the Middle East context
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.16
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #1, pp. 181-191
- Cited by
- 1091 Views
-
625 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
People’s perceptions of a fair tax administration system have garnered growing interest as a decisive ingredient that can install compliance behavior among taxpayers. The tax that taxpayers wish to evade is determined by their perceptions of the various robust dimensions of fairness (i.e., general fairness, preferred tax rate structure, exchange with the government, special provisions, and self-interest). Such an important matter, like tax fairness, has been overlooked in the extant literature, especially in the Middle East context, although tax administrations still suffer from low and unsatisfactory rates of compliance. This paper aims to empirically examine the influence of fairness perceptions of the income tax system on compliance behavior of taxpayers in Yemen. The study used a survey questionnaire administered to 400 individual taxpayers in Hadhramout, one of the most prosperous business regions in Yemen. Based on the PLS-SEM analysis tool, the study found that general system fairness, preferred tax rate, exchange with the government, and the extent of self-interest are significantly related to income tax compliance, while special provisions do not affect compliance decisions. The results of the study can alert the tax authority and policymakers to consider the non-pecuniary factors, other than the measures of the coercion. Establishing a fair tax system is probably one of the most successful approaches to boost compliance among taxpayers, thus yielding more tax revenue and diminishing the administrative cost for the tax authority.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H71, K42
-
References43
-
Tables3
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Measurement model
- Figure 2. Structural model
-
- Table 1. Convergent validity
- Table 2. Discriminant validity
- Table 3. Structural model
-
- Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., & McKee, M. (1992). Estimating the determinants of taxpayer compliance with experimental data. National Tax Journal, 7(1), 107-114.
- Alm, J., McClelland, G., & Schulze, W. (1992). Why do people pay their taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48(1), 21-38.
- Al-Ttaffi, L. H. A., & Abdul-Jabbar, H. (2018). Geopolitical differences and tax non-compliance among Yemeni SMEs. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 8(1), 31-45.
- Azmi, A. A., & Perumal, K. A. (2008). Tax Fairness Dimensions in an Asian Context: The Malaysian Perspective. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(5), 11-19.
- Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Abdul-Jabbar, H., & Aziz, S. A. (2019). Do enforcement, religiosity and peer influence zakah compliance behavior? International Journal of Financial Research, 10(6), 42-53.
- Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Abdul-Jabbar, H., & Romle, A. R. (2016). The application of theory of planned behavior on business zakah compliance in Yemen: A proposed framework. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 24(6), 2052-2057.
- Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Abdul-Jabbar, H., & Romle, A. R. (2017). Perception of business owner toward business zakah compliance intention. World Journal of Islamic History and Civilization, 7(2), 17-22.
- Bobek, D. D. (1997). Tax Fairness: How do individuals judge fairness and what effect does it have on their behavior? (Unpublished thesis). University of Florida, Michigan.
- Bordignon, M. (1993). A fairness approach to income tax evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 52(3), 345-362.
- Cain, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K. H. (2017). Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: prevalence, influence and estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 49(5), 1716-1735.
- Chan, C. W., Troutman, C. S., & O’Bryan, D. (2000). An expanded model of taxpayer compliance: empirical evidence from the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 9(2), 83-103.
- Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report pls analyses. Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Christensen, A. L., Weihrich, S. G., & Newman, M. G. (1994). The impact of education on perceptions of tax fairness. Advances in Taxation, 6, 63-94.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
- Faizal, S., & Palil, M. R. (2015). Study on fairness and individual tax compliance in Malaysia: Preliminary fndings. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 8(1), 74-79.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Gberegbe, F. B., & Umoren, A. O. (2017). The perception of tax fairness and personal income tax compliance of SMEs in Rivers State. Journal of Research in Business and Management, 5(2), 40-51.
- Geisser, S. (1974). Predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101-107.
- Gerbing, M. D. (1988). An empirical study of taxpayer perceptions of fairness (Unpublished thesis). University of Texas, Austin.
- Gilligan, G., & Richardson, G. (2005). Perceptions and tax compliance behavior in Australia and Hong Kong – A preliminary study. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(1), 11-67.
- Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed). London: Sage Publications.
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
- Hanefah, H. M. B. M. (1996). An evaluation of the Malaysian tax administrative system and tax payers’ perceptions towards assessment systems, tax law fairness, and tax law complexity (Unpublished thesis). Universiti Utara Malaysia.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing, 20, 277-319.
- Jackson, B. R., & Milliron, V. C. (1986). Tax compliance research finding, problem and prospect. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5(1), 125-165.
- Jun, B. H., Cho, M., & Park, M. H. (2015). Procedural fairness and taxpayers’ response: Evidence from an experiment. Korean Economic Review, 31(2), 301-326.
- Kirchgassner, G. (2011). Tax morale, tax evasion and the shadow economy. Handbook on the Shadow Economy.
- Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
- Mason, R., & Calvin, L. (1986). Public confidence and admitted tax evasion. National Tax Journal, 37(4), 489-496.
- Ministry of Planning & International Cooperation (MPIC). (2016). Annual Report.
- Musimenta, D., Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Muhwezi, M., Akankunda, B., & Nalukenge, I. (2017). Tax compliance of small and medium enterprises: A developing country perspective. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 25(2), 149-175.
- Richardson, G. (2006). The impact of tax fairness dimensions on tax compliance behavior in an Asian jurisdiction: The case of Hong Kong. International Tax Journal, 32(1), 29-42.
- Saad, N. (2011). Fairness perceptions and compliance behaviour: taxpayers’ judgments in self-assessment environments (Unpublished thesis). University of Canterbury.
- Saad, N. (2012). Information dissemination and fairness perceptions: The case of Inland Revenue Board Malaysia. In Knowledge Management International Conference (pp. 4-6). Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
- Sinnasamy, P., & Bidin, Z. (2017). The relationship between tax rate, penalty rate, tax fairness and excise duty non-compliance. SHS Web of Conferences, 34, 11001.
- Slemrod, J., & Yitzhaki, S. (2002). Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration. Handbook of Public Economics, 3, 1423-1470.
- Spicer, M. W., & Becker, L. A. (1980). Fiscal inequity and tax evasion: An experimental approach. National Tax Journal, 171-175.
- Thomas, C. (2012). Assessing tax fairness dimensions in a small developing economy. Business and Economics Journal, 3(1), 1-8.
- Verboon, P., & Dijke, M. Van. (2007). A self-interest analysis of justice and tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 704-727.
- Wenzel, M. (2003). Tax compliance and the psychology of justice: Mapping the field. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing Democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 41-69). Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Yemen Tax Authority. (2016). Annual report. Statistics of registered taxpayers.