The effect of corporate governance practices on firms’ sustainable growth: The moderating role of sustainability awards in Thailand’s ESG-oriented companies
-
Received August 22, 2025;Accepted October 31, 2025;Published November 14, 2025
-
Author(s)Thanawut SaengkassaneeLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6421-9841
,
Panern IntaraLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7314-3300
,
Klangjai SangwichitrLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6796-2461
,
Porntip JirathumrongLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9196-0874
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(4).2025.22
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #4, pp. 301-312
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 30 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Corporate governance plays a crucial role in promoting sustainability by guiding firms toward responsible management that balance growth and accountability. This study examines the impact of corporate governance on sustainable growth of firms in the Thailand Sustainability Investment list and investigates whether the Stock Exchange of Thailand Sustainability Awards moderate this relationship. The analysis utilizes secondary panel data from 183 companies, comprising 778 firm-year observations from 2015 to 2022, sourced from the SETSMART database. The study considers board size, board independence, director shareholding, CEO duality, board meeting frequency, and the presence of risk committee as independent variables, with sustainable growth as the dependent variable. The multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the hypotheses. Empirical results reveal that board size (β = 1.3607, p < 0.05), independent directors (β = 2.1223, p < 0.01), executive shareholding (β = 0.0456, p < 0.10), and the presence of a risk committee (β = 0.1339, p < 0.10) positively affect sustainable growth, while CEO duality has a significant negative impact (β = –1.2335, p < 0.10). Furthermore, the Stock Exchange of Thailand Sustainability Awards played a moderating role, as its interaction with board size (β = 1.2307, p < 0.10) and independent directors (β = 1.3123, p < 0.05) strengthens their positive effects. These findings suggest that effective governance enhances sustainable growth, and sustainability awards amplify this influence among Thai listed firms. The study offers implications for regulators to foster governance frameworks and award programs supporting sustainable growth.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G34, O16, Q01, G32
-
References30
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variable description
- Table 2. Summary of descriptive statistics (Continuous variables)
- Table 3. Summary of descriptive statistics (Dummy variables)
- Table 4. Correlation analysis
- Table 5. Empirical results of six corporate governance elements and the moderating role of SSA on sustainable growth using pooled OLS
-
- Al-Absy, M., & Hasan, M. (2023). Impact of the board of directors’ characteristics on firm performance: A case of Bahraini listed firms. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(1), 291-301.
- Apimonbutr, T., & Hensawang, S. (2017). The relationship between sustainability performance and securities returns: An empirical study of listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand receiving the Dow Jones Sustainability Index award. Ratchapark Journal, 12(25), 37-51.
- Chai, S., Cao, S., Li, Q., Ji, Q., & Liu, Z. (2023). Exploring the nexus between ESG disclosure and corporate sustainable growth: Moderating role of media attention. Finance Research Letters, 58.
- Chanprasit, W., Poungsangsuk, S., Chawanachote, N., Tagairach, B., Somsiri, W., & Netumporn, K. (2023). The relationship between corporate governance, financial ratios, and performance of listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand with excellent corporate governance. RMUTP Research Journal: Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(2), 44-59. (In Thai).
- Chatromyen, T. (2015). The relationship between corporate governance and performance of listed companies in the SET100 group in Thailand (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Thammasat University. (In Thai).
- Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
- Freire, C., Carrera, F., Auquilla, P., & Hurtado, G. (2020). Independence of corporate governance and its relation to financial performance. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 150-159.
- Gray, R., Owen, L., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate and social reporting. London: Prentice Hall Europe.
- Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Educational International.
- Iamphongpaiboon, N. (2022). The effect of good corporate governance and being a sustainable stock on abnormal returns and firm value (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Thammasat University. (In Thai).
- Jaisa-ard, N. (2022, August 17). The relationship between financial efficiency and business operations with consideration for environment, society, and governance (ESG). In Proceedings of the 17th Graduate Research Conference 2022.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- Khunthong, U., Thara, S., & Butrbumrung, C. (2022). The influence of environmental, social, and governance responsibility on the performance of listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Journal of Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology, 9(1), 108-120. (In Thai).
- Kwarteng, P., Opoku Appiah, K., & Addai, B. (2023). Influence of board mechanisms on sustainability performance for listed firms in Sub-Saharan Africa. Future Business Journal, 9(1), Article 85.
- Liu, H. Y. (2012). An empirical study on board characteristics and sustainable growth of listed company. Advanced Materials Research, 403-408, 2526-2529.
- Nawalmaneethi, N., Phetchoetchu, P., & Khumsuprom, S. (2020). The influence of enterprise risk management on firm value measured by Tobin’s Q of listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Sutthiparitad Journal, 34(111), 243-259. (In Thai).
- OECD. (2015). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Panchanathorn, N., & Saengkiew, P. (2021). The influence of good corporate governance and corporate social responsibility on business performance of energy and utilities sector listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Mahachula Academic Journal of Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, 8(8), 77-89.
- Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Tuzhyk, K., Proskurina, N., & Gryn, V. (2021). Do sustainability reporting conduct and corporate governance attributes relate? Empirical evidence from China. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 110-123.
- Rahman, K. M., & Bremer, M. (2016). Effective corporate governance and financial reporting in Japan. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 12(Suppl. 1), 93-122.
- Rashid, A. (2018). Board independence and firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 34-49.
- Sabsombat, N., Sangthong, K., Yasaboo, N., Laddee, N., Chukaew, N., & Pongsri, S. (2020). The relationship between corporate governance and firm value of listed companies on the Stock Exchange of Thailand in SET100 Index. WMS Journal of Management, 9(4), 1-14.
- Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand. (2024). Corporate governance code for listed companies 2017. (In Thai).
- Stock Exchange of Thailand. (2023). SET Awards 2023 criteria. (In Thai).
- Thongchai, C., & Akho, S. (2025). Rāngwạl kār dảnein ṭhurkic xỳāng yạ̀ngyụ̄n læa mūlkh̀ā kickār: H̄lạk ṭ̄hān cāk bris̄ʹạth cd thabeīyn nı tlādh̄lạkthrạphy̒ h̄æ̀ng pratheṣ̄thịy. [Sustainable business operation awards and firm value: Evidence from listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand]. Journal of Accountancy and Management, 17(2), 30-48.
- Tibiletti, V., Marchini, P. L., Furlotti, K., & Medioli, A. (2021). Does corporate governance matter in corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 896-907.
- Upathampracha, R. (2015). The relationship between corporate governance and performance of listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Srinakharinwirot Business Journal, 6(1), 12-25.
- Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113-142. (In Thai).
- Vipoosikul, S. (2017). The relationship of sustainability investment and firm value of listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Thammasat University. (In Thai).
- Yu, L., & Huang, C. (2024). Analysis of corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance: Evidence from China. SHS Web of Conferences, 192, Article 03002.
-
-
Conceptualization
Thanawut Saengkassanee, Panern Intara, Klangjai Sangwichitr
-
Data curation
Thanawut Saengkassanee, Panern Intara
-
Formal Analysis
Thanawut Saengkassanee, Panern Intara, Porntip Jirathumrong
-
Investigation
Thanawut Saengkassanee, Klangjai Sangwichitr, Porntip Jirathumrong
-
Methodology
Thanawut Saengkassanee, Panern Intara
-
Resources
Thanawut Saengkassanee, Panern Intara
-
Software
Thanawut Saengkassanee, Panern Intara
-
Supervision
Thanawut Saengkassanee, Panern Intara, Klangjai Sangwichitr
-
Visualization
Thanawut Saengkassanee
-
Writing – original draft
Thanawut Saengkassanee, Panern Intara, Klangjai Sangwichitr, Porntip Jirathumrong
-
Writing – review & editing
Thanawut Saengkassanee, Panern Intara, Klangjai Sangwichitr, Porntip Jirathumrong
-
Project administration
Panern Intara
-
Validation
Panern Intara
-
Conceptualization
-
ESG disclosure and financial performance: Empirical study of Vietnamese commercial banks
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024 Issue #1 pp. 208-220 Views: 5724 Downloads: 1702 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure becomes vital for banks to be transparent and accountable for their investments and lending decisions to shareholders, regulators, and society. The potential enhancement of shareholder value through ESG disclosure is still inconsistent. Empirical studies on the association between ESG disclosure and financial performance are mixed and limited in emerging economies. This study aims to examine whether ESG disclosure impacts the financial performance of 24 Vietnamese commercial banks in terms of return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and net interest margin (NIM). The study uses the feasible generalized least squares estimation method based on panel data from 2018 to 2022. The study employs content analysis on 12 themes related to environmental, social, and governance pillars to score policy disclosure based on the Fair Finance Guide Methodology. The results highlight the positive effects of ESG policy disclosure, individual environment disclosure (E), and individual governance disclosure (G) on bank financial performance. Notably, ESG, E, and G have the largest influence on ROE, with coefficients of 0.051, 0.036, and 0.027, respectively, at a 5% significance level. However, the study does not provide evidence of a statistically significant association between social disclosure and financial performance. These results provide empirical evidence for regulators and bank managers to shape ESG policies and practices aligning with international standards.
Acknowledgment
ESG disclosure score of 11 banks as primary data in this study is conducted under the project coordinated by the Fair Finance Vietnam coalition, as part of Fair Finance International. -
Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 19-35 Views: 5409 Downloads: 2040 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯCorporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting plays a key role in management control, particularly in light of the increased demand for non-financial reporting after the financial crisis of 2008–2009. This literature review evaluates 47 empirical studies that concentrate on the influence of several board composition variables on the quantity and quality of CSR reporting. The author briefly introduces the research framework that underpins current empirical studies in this field. This is followed by a discussion of the main variables of board composition: (1) committees (audit and CSR committees), (2) board independence, (3) board expertise, (4) CEO duality, (5) board diversity (gender and foreign diversity), (6) board activity, and (7) board size. The author, then, summarizes the key findings, discusses the limitations of the existing research and offers useful recommendations for researchers, firm practice and regulators.
-
Financial sustainability management of the insurance company: case of Ukraine
Ruslana Pikus
,
Nataliia Prykaziuk
,
Mariia Balytska
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.18
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 219-228 Views: 4616 Downloads: 661 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn the current conditions of the Ukrainian economy, which is characterized by crisis phenomena and frequent changes in legislation, the insurance organizations are facing a number of difficulties in maintaining their financial sustainability. Moreover, these processes take place under the increased requirements for solvency of insurers. However, a significant part of domestic insurance companies is financially unstable, which is conditioned not only by the lack of funds, but also by the low level of management. This situation hinders the further development of the insurance market in Ukraine and has a negative impact on all areas of the domestic financial system and prevents it from successful integration into the European financial field. In order to address this problem, it is necessary to distinguish the key groups of risks that affect the financial sustainability of insurance organizations, among which there are the following: insurance, strategic, market risk, risk of inefficient capital structure, risk of limiting the insurance company’s liquidity, tax risk, investment risk, operational risk, the risk of ineffective organizational structure of the enterprise, and information risk. It should be noted that under conditions of changing environment, the impact of these risks only increases, and therefore the task of minimizing the impact of these risks on the activities of insurance companies is highly important. Accordingly, the authors of the article proposed a four-stage strategy to manage the financial sustainability of the insurance company, the purpose of which is to identify the risks of limiting the insurer’s financial sustainability, their qualitative and quantitative assessment, as well as the development and implementation of appropriate measures to minimize and eliminate unacceptable consequences.

