The role of state ownership in the relationship between monetary policy and financial investment: Evidence from Vietnam
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.23(2).2026.11
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2026, Issue #2, pp. 139-149
- 21 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The growing financialization of non-financial firms has raised concerns about resource allocation and the effectiveness of monetary policy, particularly in emerging economies where financial markets remain bank-oriented. This study analyzes the impact of monetary policy on the financial investment behavior of listed non-financial firms in Vietnam, with a specific focus on the moderating role of state ownership. Using an unbalanced panel of 545 firms observed over the period 2007–2024, the generalized method of moments is employed to address endogeneity and dynamic adjustment in firms’ investment decisions. Monetary policy is proxied by key interest rate measures, while state ownership is captured using both continuous ownership ratios and a dummy variable for controlling state ownership. The empirical results show that a one percentage point reduction in interest rates increases financial investment by about 0.08–0.10 percentage points. However, this effect diminishes as state ownership rises and becomes insignificant at moderate ownership levels. For firms with controlling state ownership, monetary easing exerts a negative effect on financial investment, indicating a reversal in the transmission mechanism. These findings point to a structural divergence in financial behavior across ownership types and highlight the importance of ownership structure in shaping firms’ responses to monetary policy. From a policy perspective, the results underscore the need to consider heterogeneity in ownership when evaluating monetary policy effectiveness and to closely monitor corporate financialization, which may crowd out productive investment.
Acknowledgment
This study is part of Nguyen Hoai Diem Lam’s doctoral dissertation at Ho Chi Minh University of Banking, carried out under the academic supervision of Van Dan Dang and Hoang Chung Nguyen.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E52, G30
-
References33
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variable definitions and descriptive statistics
- Table 2. Monetary interest rates and financial investment ratio
- Table 3. Policy interest rates and the moderating role of the state ownership ratio
- Table 4. Interbank interest rates and the moderating role of state ownership ratio
- Table 5. Policy interest rates and the moderating role of the state ownership dummy
- Table 6. Interbank interest rates and the moderating role of the state ownership dummy
-
- Anwar, C. J., Khairiyah, D, Suhendra, I., & Zahara, V. M. (2023). Monetary policy and investment in ASEAN-5 countries. European Journal of Development Studies, 3(5), 112-118.
- Bernanke, B. S., Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1999). The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. In Handbook of Macroeconomics (Vol. 1, Number PART C, pp. 1341-1393). Elsevier.
- Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
- Borio, C., & Zhu, H. (2012). Capital regulation, risk-taking and monetary policy: A missing link in the transmission mechanism? Journal of Financial Stability, 8(4), 236-251.
- Castelnovo, P. (2022). Innovation in private and state-owned enterprises: A cross-industry analysis of patenting activity. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 62, 98-113.
- Chen, H., Li, R., & Tillmann, P. (2019). Pushing on a string: State-owned enterprises and monetary policy transmission in China. China Economic Review, 54, 26-40.
- Cloyne, J., Ferreira, C., & Surico, P. (2020). Monetary policy when households have debt: New evidence on the transmission mechanism. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(1), 102-129.
- Dang, V. D., & Huynh, J. (2025). How does uncertainty drive the bank lending channel of monetary policy? Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 30(1), 190-210.
- De Santis, R. A., & Zaghini, A. (2021). Unconventional monetary policy and corporate bond issuance. European Economic Review, 135, 103727.
- di Giovanni, J., & Rogers, J. (2024). The impact of U.S. monetary policy on foreign firms. IMF Economic Review, 72(1), 58-115.
- Durante, E., Ferrando, A., & Vermeulen, P. (2022). Monetary policy, investment and firm heterogeneity. European Economic Review, 148.
- Fabiani, A., Piñeros, M. L., Peydró, J.-L., & Soto, P. E. (2022). Capital controls, domestic macroprudential policy and the bank lending channel of monetary policy. Journal of International Economics.
- Fonseka, M., Samarakoon, L. P., Tian, G. L., & Seng, R. (2021). The impact of social trust and state ownership on investment efficiency of Chinese firms. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 74.
- Fu, X., Wang, S., & Jia, J. (2024). Equity incentives and dynamic adjustments to corporate financialization: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 92, 948-966.
- Gnewuch, M., & Zhang, D. (2025). Monetary policy, firm heterogeneity, and the distribution of investment rates. Journal of Monetary Economics, 149, 103721.
- Huynh, J. (2024). Uncertainty in banking and trade credit of firms. Borsa Istanbul Review.
- Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- Merlevede, B., & Muylle, P. (2025). State-owned enterprises in Europe: Firm performance and aggregate effects. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.
- Niu, F., Zhang, L., & Su, W. (2023). Association between state ownership participation and the performance of private firms: Evidence from China. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 31(4), 979-1006.
- Orhangazi, Ö. (2008). Financialisation and capital accumulation in the non-financial corporate sector: A theoretical and empirical investigation on the US economy: 1973–2003. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(6), 863-886.
- Ottonello, P., & Winberry, T. (2020). Financial heterogeneity and the investment channel of monetary policy. Econometrica, 88(6), 2473-2502.
- Renzhi, N., & Beirne, J. (2023). Corporate market power and monetary policy transmission in Asia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 82, 102132.
- Richardson, S. (2006). Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2-3), 159-189.
- Shleifer, A. (1998). State versus private ownership. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 133-150.
- Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-29.
- Tudi, T., Wu, J., Chen, M., & Jeon, B. N. (2025). Does foreign demand affect corporate financialization? Some evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 65, 101232.
- Wang, T., Xu, J., & Yang, L. (2024). Financial geographic density and corporate financial asset holdings: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 86, 102421.
- Wu, H., & Xu, B. (2021). Did state-owned enterprises do better during COVID-19? Evidence from a survey of company executives in China. Journal of Economics and Business, 115, 105991.
- Xu, S., Chen, S., Jiao, W., & Chen, M. (2025). State-owned enterprises shareholders and innovation of private enterprises: Evidence from China. Technovation, 140, 103144.
- Zhang, C., & Zheng, N. (2020). Monetary policy and financial investments of nonfinancial firms: New evidence from China. China Economic Review, 60, 101420.
- Zhang, H., Feng, Y., Wang, Y., & Ni, J. (2024). Peer effects in corporate financialization: The role of Fintech in financial decision making. International Review of Financial Analysis, 94, 103267.


