Understanding Thailand’s green bond market: Issuance dynamics, return-risk performance, and their relationship with issuance volume
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.23(1).2026.25
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2026, Issue #1, pp. 331-346
- 11 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Thailand’s green bond market is expanding but remains less developed than in advanced economies, raising questions about issuance patterns and whether return–risk conditions support broader market growth. This study aims to analyze issuance dynamics in Thailand’s green bond market, evaluate return and risk performance, assess the relationship between return, risk, and issuance volume, and classify green bonds based on their risk characteristics. The sample included 62 green bonds registered with the Thai Bond Market Association (ThaiBMA) during 2019–2025. Descriptive statistics are used to summarize issuance and performance indicators; return measures include current yield, yield to maturity, holding period return, and annual percentage rate; risk is assessed using seven variables capturing default, liquidity, interest rate, inflation, and reinvestment risks, and hierarchical clustering is applied to classify bonds by risk level. Results show that private-sector issuers dominate the market, accounting for 79% of outstanding green bond value (103.216 billion baht), followed by state-owned enterprises (12%) and foreign issuers (9%). Current yield ranges from 1.62% to 5.55% (mean 3.40%), while yield to maturity ranges from 1.75% to 8.86% (mean 3.20%). Credit spreads range from 0.41% to 3.49% (mean 1.46%), and duration ranges from 0.019 to 10.07 years (mean 3.35), indicating generally moderate risk conditions. SEM analysis further reveals a significant positive relationship between risk and return, while issuance volume is not significantly related to either factor. Cluster analysis identifies four distinct risk groups – low, medium, high, and highest – offering a practical risk classification for investors and policymakers to support sustainable finance development in Thailand.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G12, G32, Q56, F65
-
References47
-
Tables4
-
Figures8
-
- Figure 1. Thai green bond market structure
- Figure 2. Green bond, categorized by yield
- Figure 3. Confirmatory factor analysis
- Figure 4. SEM
- Figure 5. Dendrogram AIC and clustering efficiency for return
- Figure 6. Green bond return group clustering
- Figure 7. Dendrogram AIC and clustering efficiency for risk
- Figure 8. Green bond risk group clustering
-
- Table 1. Variables used and measurement
- Table 2. Return descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Risk descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Credit rating descriptive characteristics
-
- Aini, A., Sukmadilaga, C., & K Ghani, E. (2023). Green Bonds, Investor Attention and Stock Market Reaction: Evidence from ASEAN Countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13, 334-343.
- Asian Development Bank. (2022). Green bond market survey for Thailand: Insights on the perspectives of institutional investors and underwriters. Asian Development Bank.
- Asian Development Bank. (2025, March). Recent developments in the ASEAN+3 sustainable bond markets. Asia Bond Monitor.
- Baker, M., Bergstresser, D., Serafeim, G., & Wurgler, J. (2022). The pricing and ownership of US green bonds. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14, 415-437.
- Bi, H., Marsh, W. B., & An, P. (2024). Corporate interest expenses are expected to increase further. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, KC Fed Economic Bulletin.
- Bruno, V., Dathan, M., & Kitsul, Y. (2024). Corporate bond issuance over financial stress episodes: A global perspective. International Finance Discussion Papers, 1390, 1-49.
- Capital, G. (2024). Factors Influencing Green Bonds Pricing.
- Çelik, S., & Akarim, Y. D. (2012). Does Market Timing Drive Capital Structure? Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Market. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(1), 140-152.
- Cheng, G., Ehlers, T., Packer, F., & Xiao, Y. (2024). Sovereign green bonds: A catalyst for sustainable debt market development? (IMF Working Paper No. 2024/120). International Monetary Fund.
- Dai, Y., Guo, K., Jin, Z., & Wu, Y. (2022). Extensions for Macaulay Duration, Modified Duration, and Further Study on Immunization Strategy.
- De Santis, R. A., & Zaghini, A. (2021). Unconventional monetary policy and corporate bond issuance. European Economic Review, 135, 103727.
- Eckbo, B. E., Masulis, R. W., & Norli, Ø. (2007). Chapter 6 – Security Offerings. In Eckbo, B. E. (Ed.), Handbook of Empirical Corporate Finance (pp. 233-373). Elsevier.
- Estrella, A., & Mishkin, F. S. (1996). The yield curve as a predictor of U.S. recessions. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 2(7), 1-6.
- Fatica, S., Panzica, R., & Rancan, M. (2021). The pricing of green bonds: Are financial institutions special? Journal of Financial Stability, 54, 100873.
- Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499-516.
- França, R., & Gaspar, R. M. (2024). On the Bias of the Unbiased Expectation Theory. Mathematics, 12(1), 105.
- Gilchrist, S., & Zakrajšek, E. (2012). Credit Spreads and Business Cycle Fluctuations. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1692-1720.
- Hachenberg, B., & Schiereck, D. (2020). Are green bonds priced differently from conventional bonds? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Journal of Asset Management, 21(5), 371-383.
- Hawawini, G. (1984). On the relationship between Macaulay’s bond duration and the term to maturity. Economics Letters, 16(3), 331-337.
- Hovakimian, A., Opler, T., & Titman, S. (2001). The Debt-Equity Choice. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(1), 1-24.
- Huang, J.-Z., Li, P., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Yao, X., & Zhang, L. (2025). Do investors reach for yield? Evidence from corporate bond mutual fund flows. Journal of Empirical Finance, 83, 101625.
- Ibrić, M., Kozarević, E., & Mešković, A. (2024). The Rise of Green Bonds: Global Context and European Insights.
- Idilbi-Bayaa, Y., & Qadan, M. (2022). What the current yield curve says, and what the future prices of energy do. Resources Policy, 75, 102494.
- International Finance Corporation (IFC), & Amundi. (2025). Emerging market green bonds 2024: IFC–Amundi joint report (7th ed.). International Finance Corporation.
- International Finance Corporation. (2025). Emerging market green bonds 2024: IFC–Amundi joint report. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.
- Larcker, D. F., & Watts, E. M. (2020). Where’s the greenium? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 69(2-3), 101312.
- Löffler, K. U., Petreski, A., & Stephan, A. (2021). Drivers of green bond issuance and new evidence on the “greenium.” Eurasian Economic Review, 11(1), 1-24.
- MacAskill, S., Roca, E., Liu, B., Stewart, R. A., & Sahin, O. (2021). Is there a green premium in the green bond market? Systematic literature review revealing premium determinants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124491.
- Mega, A., & Widayat, W. (2019). Effects of bond’s interest rate, rating and maturity time toward bond’s yields. Manajemen Bisnis, 9.
- Nesbitt, S. L. (2019). Current yield or yield to maturity? In Private debt: Opportunities in corporate direct lending. John Wiley & Sons.
- Papavassiliou, V. (2021). Euro area sovereign bond yields during the Covid19 pandemic: What do they tell us? European Capital Markets Institute (ECMI), Commentary No. 76.
- Peren, F. W. (2023). Annual Percentage Rate. In F. W. Peren (Ed.). Financial Math for Business and Economics: Compendium of Essential Formulas (pp. 29-33). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Public Debt Management Office. (2024). Sustainability bond annual report 2024. Bangkok: Ministry of Finance, Thailand.
- Schaub, M. (2019). Holding period returns from NASDAQ traded ADRs. Applied Economics Letters, 26(20), 1689-1693.
- Shutaywi, M., & Kachouie, N. N. (2021). Silhouette Analysis for Performance Evaluation in Machine Learning with Applications to Clustering. Entropy, 23(6), 759.
- Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1979). Rating the Risks. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 21, 14-39.
- Thai Bond Market Association. (2025, July 4). Thai bond market situation summary: Q2 2025 (Press briefing document).
- ThaiBMA. (2024). Green, Social, Sustainability Bond & Sustainability-linked Bond (ESG Bond).
- Thomas, P., Bratvold, R., & Bickel, J. (2013). The Risk of Using Risk Matrices. SPE Economics & Management, 6.
- Tomczak, K. (2024). Sovereign Green Bond Market: Drivers of Yields and Liquidity. International Journal of Financial Studies, 12(2), 48.
- Ubarhande, P., & Chandani, A. (2021). Elements of Credit Rating: A Hybrid Review and Future Research Agenda. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1878977.
- Van Binsbergen, J. H., Nozawa, Y., & Schwert, M. (2024). Duration-Based Valuation of Corporate Bonds. The Review of Financial Studies, 38(1), 158-191.
- Wang, J., Wu, C., Yang, X., & Zhou, Y. (2025). Policy uncertainty and corporate bond issuance costs. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting.
- Wanganusorn, B., Tulasombat, S., Bangmek, R., & Awirothananon, T. (2024). Working Capital Policy Clustering Technique: A Case Study of Listed Companies in the Industrial Sector, MAI Thailand Journal of Liberal Art of Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, 6(3), 713-726.
- Wongaree, P. (2021). The evidence on the green bond premium in Asia-Pacific and Europe markets. Thammasat University.
- Yan, M., Li, X., Zhao, X., & He, Z. (2025). Liquidity and cost advantage of green bonds. Finance Research Letters, 71, 106433.
- Zerbib, O. D. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 98, 39-60.


