Weaponization of energy: A geopolitical analysis of the 2022 energy crisis and the redesign of the European order
-
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21511/gg.07(1).2026.01
-
Article InfoVolume 7 2026, Issue #1, pp. 1-7
- 23 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 transformed the European Union’s energy dependence from a latent structural vulnerability into a major geopolitical crisis, highlighting the use of energy as an instrument of strategic coercion. This paper analyzes the 2022 energy crisis as a defining moment for the EU’s security, foreign policy, and strategic autonomy. It examines how the ‘weaponization’ of energy catalyzed the European institutional response, reconfigured external energy relations, and integrated the energy transition into the core security agenda. Employing a qualitative, documentary-analytical methodology based on a comparative analysis of strategic discourse and political priorities before and after 2022, the study identifies a fundamental paradigm shift. Results demonstrate a structural realignment from a predominantly market-based, ecological framework (centered on the European Green Deal) to a securitized strategy where decarbonization is inextricably linked to energy security and strategic autonomy. Quantitatively, this shift facilitated a rapid operational decoupling: the share of Russian gas in EU consumption plummeted from approximately 40% in 2021 to under 10% by 2023, driven by a surge in LNG imports and accelerated renewable deployment. Qualitatively, it justified unprecedented institutional interventions, from emergency price caps and joint purchasing mechanisms to binding phase-out targets for Russian fuels and reframed the green transition as a central pillar of geopolitical resilience.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F51, M10, Q41
-
References30
-
Tables1
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Paradigm shift in EU energy policy (2022–2024): A comparative discursive-instrumental analysis
-
- Bordoff, J., & O’Sullivan, M. L. (2022). Green upheaval: The new geopolitics of energy. Foreign Affairs, 101.
- Council of the European Union. (2025, December 3). Council and Parliament reach agreement on rules to phase out gas imports from Russia (Press Release).
- European Central Bank (ECB). (2023). Update on economic, financial and monetary developments. Economic Bulletin, (5).
- European Commission (EC). (2022a). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the European council, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions (REPowerEU Plan) (COM/2022/230 final).
- European Commission (EC). (2022b). Joint communication to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions (JOIN(2022) 23 final). Brussels.
- European Commission (EC). (2023). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the European council, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions (COM(2023) 62 final). Brussels.
- European Council. (2022). Impact of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on the markets: EU response.
- European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER). (2023). Gas & Electricity Markets. Monitoring Report 2022.
- European Union. (2022a). Council Regulation (EU) 2022/2576 of 19 December 2022 enhancing solidarity through better coordination of gas purchases, reliable price benchmarks and exchanges of gas across borders (ST/14065/2022/INIT).
- European Union. (2022b). Council regulation (EU) 2022/2578. Establishing a market correction mechanism to protect Union citizens and the economy against excessively high prices (ST/15202/2022/INIT).
- European Union. (2022c). Regulation (EU) 2022/1032 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2022 amending Regulations (EU) 2017/1938 and (EC) No 715/2009 with regard to gas storage (PE/24/2022/INIT).
- European Union. (2023a). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/138 of 21 December 2022 establishing a list of specific high-value datasets and the modalities for their publication and reuse (C/2022/9562).
- European Union. (2023b). Directive (EU) 2023/2413 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 amending Directive (EU) 2018/2001, Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 and Directive 98/70/EC as regards the promotion of energy from renewable sources, and repealing Council Directive (EU) 2015/652 (PE/36/2023/REV/2).
- Gajdzik, B., Wolniak, R., Nagaj, R., Žuromskaitė-Nagaj, B., & Grebski, W. W. (2024). The influence of the global energy crisis on energy efficiency: A comprehensive analysis. Energies, 17(4), Article 947
- Goldthau, A. (2013). The geopolitics of natural gas. The politics of natural gas development in the European Union. Harvard University’s Belfer Center and Rice University’s Baker Institute Center for Energy Studies.
- Goldthau, A., & Youngs, R. (2023). The EU energy crisis and a new geopolitics of climate transition. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(S1), 115-124.
- Gross, S., & Stelzenmüller, C. (2024, June 18). Europe’s Messy Russian gas divorce: More than two years after Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, reliance on Russia for energy lingers. Brookings Institution.
- Ha, L. T. (2024). A wavelet analysis of dynamic connectedness between geopolitical risk and renewable energy volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic and Ukraine-Russia conflicts. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(12), 17994-18009.
- Hafner, M., & Tagliapietra, S. (2020). The geopolitics of the global energy transition. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
- Herranz-Surralles, A. (2024). The EU energy transition in a geopoliticizing world. Geopolitics, 29(5), 1882-1912.
- Hrubliak, O., Zhavoronok, A., Popelo, O., Kharabara, V., Dubyna, M., & Lopashchuk, I. (2025). The impact of financial globalization on the economic growth of countries: A case for Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 22(4), 209-226.
- International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). Energy Technology Perspectives.
- International Energy Agency (IEA). (2024). Gas Market Report, Q1 2024.
- International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2022). War Sets Back the Global Recovery. World Economic Outlook.
- Jeroudi, L. (2024, November 12). Energy geopolitics in a fragmented world: A comparative analysis of Europe and the Middle East. TRENDS Research & Advisory.
- Khan, K., Khurshid, A., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023). Energy security analysis in a geopolitically volatile world: A causal study. Resources Policy, 83, Article 103673.
- Raya-Tapia, A. Y., López-Flores, F. J., Ramírez-Márquez, C., & Ponce-Ortega, J. M. (2025). The energy-food nexus: Geopolitical and health crisis analysis. In Machine Learning and Clustering for a Sustainable Future: Applications in Engineering and Environmental Science (pp. 225-241). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
- Ruta, M. (Ed.). (2022). The impact of the war in Ukraine on global trade and investment. World Bank.
- Siddi, M., & Prandin, F. (2023). Governing the EU’s energy crisis: The European Commission’s geopolitical turn and its pitfalls. Politics and Governance, 11(4), 286-296.
- Tesfu, E. I. (2024). The EU’s energy crisis: Shifting from fossil fuels to renewable solutions amid geopolitical tensions. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(6), 608-613.


