Jakša Puljiz

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
This paper analyzes the determinants of municipal capital transfer allocation in North Macedonia using data for all 80 municipalities over 2018–2022. Capital transfers are a key investment instrument in fiscally decentralized systems, yet their fragmented and project-based delivery may weaken equalization. To test whether transfers follow developmental or fiscal-capacity criteria, the study combines baseline OLS estimates with a two-part (hurdle) model that separates access from transfer intensity, quantile regressions to capture distributional heterogeneity, and inequality measures. The results show no statistically significant association between municipal development level or fiscal capacity and the probability of receiving any capital transfer, indicating that entry into the system is not needs-based. Conditional on receipt, the development coefficient is negative but not robustly significant, indicating no systematic targeting of less-developed units among recipients. Inequality diagnostics reinforce this conclusion: the Gini coefficient for per-capita capital transfers (0.75) vastly exceeds that for municipal revenues (0.18), and Lorenz curves reveal a sharply more unequal transfer distribution. Overall, the evidence implies that unobserved institutional or political factors dominate the access margin and that capital transfers currently introduce an additional layer of territorial divergence rather than mitigating existing disparities.

Acknowledgments
The author gratefully acknowledges the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) for providing access to data used in this research. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of UNDP.