Sharia corporate governance and financial reporting timeliness: Evidence of the implementation of banking regulations in Indonesia

  • Received November 11, 2020;
    Accepted December 12, 2020;
    Published December 22, 2020
  • Author(s)
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(4).2020.15
  • Article Info
    Volume 15 2020, Issue #4, pp. 179-192
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    4 articles
  • 1050 Views
  • 367 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

This paper aims to study Islamic banking (IB) regulations related to the influence of the Sharia corporate governance (SCG) mechanism on financial reporting timeliness (FRTL) in Indonesia. The unbalanced panel data obtained empirically during a period that ranges from 2016 to 2019 includes observations from 54 Islamic commercial banks (ICb), 82 Sharia business unit (SBu) banks and 82 conventional banks (CB). Panel regression model is used in this study to adjust the unbalanced panel data obtained. The findings indicate that the variation of FRTL for IBs (represented by ICb) is determined by Sharia corporate governance (SCG) mechanisms. Further findings relate to a comparative study of variations in FRTL between ICb, SBu, and CBs. Although there are different determinants between ICb (SCG) and CBs (CG), there is no difference in FRTL variation between the two. Meanwhile, between ICb and SBu, whose regulations have the same determinant, there are differences between the two FRTL variations. The novelty of this paper is that, firstly, SCG is constructed on the basis of the IBs regulation to determine FRTL, and secondly, the variationі in FRTL between the IBs and CBs groups are compared.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Number of banks and observations
    • Table 2. Pattern of sample banks submitting audited financial statements
    • Table 3. Variable types, expected signs and their measurement
    • Table 4. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 5. Pearson correlation matrix
    • Table 6. Regression model results from equation 2
    • Table 7. Regression model results from equation 3
    • Table A1. BOC dimensions
    • Table A2. BOD dimensions
    • Table A3. SSB dimensions
    • Table A4. AC effectiveness dimension
    • Conceptualization
      Zulfikar Zulfikar
    • Formal Analysis
      Zulfikar Zulfikar
    • Investigation
      Zulfikar Zulfikar
    • Methodology
      Zulfikar Zulfikar
    • Supervision
      Zulfikar Zulfikar
    • Validation
      Zulfikar Zulfikar, Mujiyati Mujiyati
    • Writing – original draft
      Zulfikar Zulfikar
    • Data curation
      Andy Dwi Bayu Bawono, Sri Wahyuni
    • Funding acquisition
      Andy Dwi Bayu Bawono, Mujiyati Mujiyati
    • Project administration
      Andy Dwi Bayu Bawono, Mujiyati Mujiyati, Sri Wahyuni
    • Software
      Andy Dwi Bayu Bawono
    • Writing – review & editing
      Andy Dwi Bayu Bawono, Sri Wahyuni
    • Resources
      Mujiyati Mujiyati, Sri Wahyuni
    • Visualization
      Mujiyati Mujiyati, Sri Wahyuni