Bank concentration, debt maturity, and borrowing costs: Evidence from Vietnam
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(1).2026.04
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2026, Issue #1, pp. 47-57
- 10 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
In bank-dependent economies, the structure and cost of corporate debt are crucial determinants of financial sustainability and investment decisions. Vietnam, with its underdeveloped capital market and dominance of bank lending, presents an ideal context to examine how banking market structure influences corporate financing. This paper explores the critical role of bank concentration in shaping the maturity structure and cost of debt among 520 listed Vietnamese firms during 2010–2024. The study utilizes financial data from FiinPro, including firm-level, bank-level, and macroeconomic indicators. A dynamic panel data model is estimated using the two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM) approach to address endogeneity concerns and ensure the robustness of results. The results highlight the pivotal role of bank concentration in shaping both the maturity structure and cost of corporate debt. The empirical findings reveal that higher bank concentration significantly increases the proportion of long-term debt. At the same time, firms reduce their reliance on short-term financing, indicating a shift toward more stable financial structures. Moreover, firms operating in more concentrated banking environments benefit from lower borrowing costs.
Acknowledgment
This research forms a component of Thi Hong Nhung Nguyen’s doctoral dissertation at Ho Chi Minh University of Banking, conducted under the supervision of Van Dan Dang.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D40, G21, G30
-
References34
-
Tables7
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics
- Table 2. Impact of banking concentration on the short-term debt ratio
- Table 3. Impact of banking concentration on the short-term debt ratio: Robustness checks
- Table 4. Impact of banking concentration on the long-term debt ratio
- Table 5. Impact of banking concentration on the long-term debt ratio: Robustness checks
- Table 6. Impact of bank concentration on the cost of borrowing
- Table 7. Impact of bank concentration on the cost of borrowing: Robustness checks
-
- Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
- Bai, Z., Ban, Y., & Hu, H. (2024). Banking competition and digital transformation. Finance Research Letters, 61, 105068.
- Bain, J. S. (1951). Relation of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing, 1936-1940. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65(3), 293-324.
- Berger, A. N., & Hannan, T. H. (1989). The price-concentration relationship in banking. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2), 291.
- Black, S. E., & Strahan, P. E. (2002). Entrepreneurship and bank credit availability. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2807-2833.
- Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
- Bonini, S., Dell’Acqua, A., Fungo, M., & Kysucky, V. (2016). Credit market concentration, relationship lending and the cost of debt. International Review of Financial Analysis, 45, 172-179.
- Boot, A. W. A. (2000). Relationship banking: What do we now? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9(1), 7-25.
- Boyd, J. H., & De Nicoló, G. (2005). The theory of bank risk taking and competition revisited. Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1329-1343.
- Cao-Alvira, J. J., & Gomez-Gonzalez, J. E. (2025). On regional bank concentration and firm leverage: The case of Colombia. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 61(1), 80-93.
- Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (1999). Institutions, financial markets, and firm debt maturity. Journal of Financial Economics, 54(3), 295-336.
- Demsetz, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 1-9.
- Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 135-160.
- Detragiache, E., Garella, P., & Guiso, L. (2000). Multiple versus single banking relationships: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Finance, 55(3), 1133-1161.
- Fan, J. P. H., Titman, S., & Twite, G. (2012). An international comparison of capital structure and debt maturity choices. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47(1), 23-56.
- Flannery, M. J. (1986). Asymmetric information and risky debt maturity choice. The Journal of Finance, 41(1), 19-37.
- Gao, Y., & Xu, J. (2023). Bank competition and firm labor investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(7), 2283-2297.
- González, V. M., & González, F. (2008). Influence of bank concentration and institutions on capital structure: New international evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 363-375.
- Hernández-Cánovas, G., & Martínez-Solano, P. (2010). Relationship lending and SME financing in the continental European bank-based system. Small Business Economics, 34(4), 465-482.
- Hu, M., & Li, B. (2024). Potential risks in the easy market access: A perspective from corporate asset-debt maturity mismatch. Research in International Business and Finance, 70, 102324.
- Huynh, J. (2023). Bank competition and liquidity hoarding. Eurasian Economic Review, 13(3-4), 429-467.
- Ioannidou, V., & Ongena, S. (2010). “Time for a change”: Loan conditions and bank behavior when firms switch banks. The Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1847-1877.
- Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
- Li, B., Cheng, Y., & Tian, G. (2024). Bank competition and firm asset- debt maturity mismatch: Evidence from the SMEs in China. Research in International Business and Finance, 69, 102240.
- Li, X., & Wang, H. (2025). Bank competition, zombie firms, and the cost of debt for healthy firms.
- Ongena, S., & Smith, D. C. (2000). What determines the number of bank relationships? Cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9(1), 26-56.
- Peltzman, S. (1977). The gains and losses from industrial concentration. Journal of Law and Economics, 20(2), 229-263.
- Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1994). The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. The Journal of Finance, 49(1), 3-37.
- Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1995). The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 407-443.
- Sapienza, P. (2002). The effects of banking mergers on loan contracts. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 329-367.
- Sun, Y. (2024). Bank competition and firm greenwashing: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 63, 105279.
- Wang, X., Han, L., & Huang, X. (2020). Bank competition, concentration and EU SME cost of debt. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71.
- Xu, S. (2025). Navigating competitive pressures: The impact of banking competition on corporate short-term borrowing for long-term investment. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 93, 102871.
- Zhou, M., Huang, Z., & Jiang, K. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance performance and corporate debt maturity in China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103349.


