The US strategy of multidomain containment and China’s counter-responses in the Indo-Pacific (2019–2025)
-
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21511/gg.06(1).2025.05
-
Article InfoVolume 6 2025, Issue #1, pp. 45-58
- 17 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research article
The intensifying United States-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific has gained acute relevance for global order as strategic competition extends across military, technological, economic, and cognitive domains. This paper examines the extent and modalities of the US multidimensional strategic encirclement of China in the Indo-Pacific and analyzes China’s multidomain responses, including the PLA’s intelligentization, technological sovereignty initiatives, and economic re-sovereignization, over the period 2019–2025. The study adopts a qualitative interpretivist methodology, drawing on scholarly and primary sources, including defense doctrines, alliance frameworks such as AUKUS and QUAD, legislative instruments, and multilingual Chinese perspectives. The analysis shows that the US employs layered alliance-building, technology governance through semiconductor and export-control regimes, triangulated partnerships with actors such as Israel and India, and selective interventions in regional states, including Pakistan and the Philippines, to constrain Chinese influence. China’s countermeasures are multidimensional: advancing AI-enabled military modernization, securing strategic port access at Gwadar, Hambantota, and Ream, and reinforcing economic insulation through its Dual Circulation Strategy and yuan-based energy agreements. Results indicate that encirclement is no longer limited to geography but increasingly embedded in digital infrastructure, economic flows, and cognitive influence. The study concludes that these dynamics are accelerating a shift toward bifurcated multipolarity, marked by competing techno-security ecosystems and divergent governance norms, with significant implications for alliance cohesion, technological sovereignty, and the management of strategic escalation.
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my teachers and academic peers whose valuable insights, encouragement, and constructive discussions inspire me to enrich the quality of my work. I am especially indebted to my family – my wife and children – for their patience, understanding, and unwavering support during the long hours of research and writing. Their endurance and encouragement made this endeavor possible.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H56, N45, O33
-
References41
-
Tables8
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Top co-occurrence pairs
- Figure 2. Top 15 NVivo parent nodes (by child count)
-
- Table 1. US-led alliances circling Сhina
- Table 2. US-led tech-transfers to offset China
- Table 3. US–Pakistan engagement vectors (2024–2025)
- Table 4. China’s AI-driven military modernization
- Table 5. China’s String of Pearls Strategy
- Table 6. China’s Dual Circulation Strategy
- Table 7. Rules-based order (US) Vs (China) developmental pluralism
- Table 8. US and China’s contrasting approaches to networking
-
- Abb, P. (2023). All geopolitics is local: The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor amidst overlapping centre-periphery relations. Third World Quarterly, 44(1), 76-95.
- ASEAN. (2019, June 23). ASEAN outlook on the Indo-Pacific. ASEAN Secretariat.
- Baldwin, D. A. (2020). Economic statecraft: New edition. Princeton University Press.
- Campbell, K. M., & Doshi, R. (2025). Underestimating China: Why America needs a new strategy of allied scale to offset Beijing’s enduring advantages. Foreign Affairs.
- Center for a New American Security (CNAS). (n.d.). CNAS publications.
- Center for Industrial Development and Environmental Governance (CIDEG). (2024). AI governance issue. CIDEG Research Bulletin. Tsinghua University. (In Chinese).
- China Institute of International Studies (CIIS). (2024). Annual strategic outlook report: Overseas maritime base development.
- Congressional Research Service (CRS). (2023). Sanctions Primer: How the United States Uses Restrictive Mechanisms to Advance Foreign Policy or National Security Objectives (Report No. R47829).
- Edel, C., & Paik, K. (2025). China’s power play across the Pacific. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
- European Union (EU). (2021). EU strategy for cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. Joint Communication to the European Parliament and The Council. Brussels.
- Fair, C. C. (2018). In their own words: Understanding Lashkar-e-Tayyaba. Oxford University Press.
- Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42-79.
- Friedberg, A. L. (2011). A contest for supremacy: China, America, and the struggle for mastery in Asia. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Glaser, C. L. (2015). A US-China grand bargain? The hard choice between military competition and accommodation. International Security, 39(4), 49-90.
- Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The rise of China and the future of the West: Can the liberal system survive? Foreign Affairs, 87(1), 23-37.
- Israel Aerospace Industries & DCX Systems Limited (IAI & DCX). (2025, April 21). IAI and DCX announce establishment of new JV in India. ASDNews.
- Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston, Little, Brown.
- Kronstadt, K. A., & Margesson, R. (2022). Pakistan’s 2022 floods and implications for U.S. interests (CRS in Focus IF12211). Congressional Research Service (CRS).
- Legislation of United States. (2022). Public Law No. 117-167. CHIPS and Science Act of 2022. US Government Publishing Office.
- Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Ministry of Defence, Government of India. (2024). Annual review of defence partnerships and joint ventures.
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (MOFA Japan). (2022). National security strategy of Japan. Cabinet Secretariat.
- National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2024, October 3). Communiqué on national expenditures on science and technology in 2023. National Bureau of Statistics of China, Ministry of Science and Technology, Ministry of Finance.
- North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). (2024). Vilnius Summit Communiqué 2024.
- Pan, M., Zhang, G., Zhang, W., Zhang, J., Xu, Z., & Du, J. (2024). A review of intelligentization system and architecture for ultra-precision machining process. Processes, 12(12), Article 2754.
- PLA Daily. (2023b, April 18). How generative AI will affect future warfare. (In Chinese).
- Pu, D., Li, X., & Xiao, F. (2023, January 19). [Understanding the laws of cognitive-domain penetration affecting multi-domain operations]. PLA Daily. (In Chinese).
- Reuters. (2025, June 18). Pakistan’s army chief to meet Trump after conflict with India defused. Reuters.
- Segal, A. M. (2016). The hacked world order: How nations fight, trade, maneuver, and manipulate in the digital age. New York: Public Affairs.
- Shambaugh, D. (2013). China goes global: The partial power. Oxford University Press.
- Singh, S., & Marwah, R. (Eds.). (2023). China and the Indo-Pacific: Maneuvers and Manifestations. Palgrave Macmillan Singapore
- Tellis, A. J. (2025). Great expectations: India amid US-China competition. In H. Brands (Ed.), Lessons from the New Cold War: America Confronts the China Challenge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. (2019, July 24). China’s National Defense in the New Era [White paper].
- The White House. (2022). Indo-Pacific strategy of the United States.
- U.S. Central Command. (2024, May 2). U.S., Pakistan forces complete Exercise Inspired Union 2024. U.S. Central Command Public Affairs.
- Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill.
- Wang, H., & Miao, L. (Eds.). (2022). China and the world in a changing context: Perspectives from ambassadors to China. Springer.
- Wooley, A., Zhang, S., Fedorochko, R., & Patterson, S. (2023). Harboring Global Ambitions: China’s Ports Footprint and Implications for Future Overseas Naval Bases. Williamsburg, VA: AidData at William & Mary.
- Xinhua News Agency. (2023, August 4). Reinvestigation: True picture of China’s global port investments. XinhuaNet.
- Yan, X. (2019). Leadership and the rise of great powers. Princeton University Press.
- Zhao, T. (2024). Political Drivers of China’s Changing Nuclear Policy: Implications for U.S.–China Nuclear Relations and International Security. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.


