Effect of CSR activities on customers’ purchase intention: The mediating role of trust
-
Author(s)Imran AliLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4525-5096
,
Mohammad NaushadLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4421-3422
,
Hadeel Jaafar Alasmri
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.19(2).2023.13
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2023, Issue #2, pp. 155-169
- Cited by
- 985 Views
-
319 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the belief that businesses must consider ethical, social, and environmental issues when making decisions. Several studies have found that CSR improves corporate performance. Moreover, CSR is thought to increase consumer trust and purchase intention. This study investigates the effect of CSR activities on customers’ purchase intentions and the mediating role of trust. It draws linkages and establishes that businesses can improve their bottom lines while positively affecting society by acting responsibly.
The present study selected two independent variables (ethical corporate social responsibility and legal corporate social responsibility) alongside one dependent variable (purchase intention) and one intervening variable (trust). The sample comprises two hundred and thirty respondents from India’s National Capital Region (NCR), Delhi, and nearby regions. The data were examined using structural equation modeling (SEM). The results showed that CSR activities significantly positively affected customers’ purchase intention. Furthermore, trust mediated the linkages between CSR activities and customers’ purchase intention. The findings suggest that CSR activities can increase customers’ purchase intention by fostering trust. In other words, when customers trust a firm, they are more likely to intend to purchase its products or services. CSR managers should therefore focus on creating and maintaining trust with their customers. In addition, findings suggest that firms should be conscious of their social image. This study offers significant insights because they show that any business can be successful and socially responsible.
Acknowledgment
This study is supported via funding from Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University project number (PSAU/2023/R/1444).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M14, M31, M38
-
References52
-
Tables7
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Proposed research model
- Figure 2. Model fit
- Figure 3. Structural model
-
- Table 1. Demographics
- Table 2. KMO and Bartlett’s test
- Table 3. Construct reliability and validity
- Table 4. Discriminant validity (Fornell-Larcker criterion)
- Table 5. Fit indices of confirmatory factor analysis
- Table 6. Hypotheses conclusions
- Table 7. Mediation analysis
-
- Abdeen, A., Rajah, E., & Gaur, S. S. (2016). Consumers’ beliefs about firm’s CSR initiatives and their purchase behaviour. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(1), 2-18.
- Abuznaid, S. A. (2009). Business ethics in Islam: The glaring gap in practice. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 2(4), 278-288.
- Ali, I., & Naushad, M. (2021). Determinants of customer satisfaction in online grocery shopping. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 5(3), 383-390.
- Ali, I., Naushad, M., & Sulphey, M. M. (2020). Do trust and corporate social responsibility activities affect purchase intentions? An examination using structural equation modeling. Innovative Marketing, 16(4), 62-73.
- Bruhn, M., Schoenmueller, V., & Schäfer, D. B. (2012). Are social media replacing traditional media in terms of brand equity creation? Management research review, 35(9), 770-790.
- Brunk, K. H. (2010). Exploring origins of ethical company/brand perceptions – A consumer perspective of corporate ethics. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 255-262.
- Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer-do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560-578.
- Carroll, A. B. (1991a). Corporate social performance measurement: A commentary on methods for evaluating an elusive construct. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12(42), 385-401.
- Carroll, A. B. (1991b). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
- Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
- Choi, B., & La, S. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and customer trust on the restoration of loyalty after service failure and recovery. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(3), 223-233.
- Daft, R. L. (2015). Management. Cengage Learning.
- Dimitriades, Z. S. (2007). The influence of service climate and job involvement on customer-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in Greek service organizations: A survey. Employee Relations, 29(5), 469-491.
- Faridi, M. R., & Naushad, M. (2021). A study of brand fidelity: Its contribution and impact on the Saudi market. Innovative Marketing, 17(4), 13-25.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Friedman, M. (1963). Capitalism and freedom. Ethics, 74(1), 70-72.
- Gallarza, M. G., & Saura, I. G. (2006). Value dimensions, perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty: An investigation of university students’ travel behaviour. Tourism Management, 27(3), 437-452.
- Goel, M., & Ramanathan, P. E. (2014). Business ethics and corporate social responsibility – Is there a dividing line. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11(1), 49-59.
- Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2014). How do consumers infer corporate social responsibility? The role of organisation size. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(4), 282-293.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
- Herjanto, H., Adiwijaya, M., Wijaya, E., & Semuel, H. (2020). The effect of celebrity endorsement on Instagram fashion purchase intention: The evidence from Indonesia. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 11(1), 203-221.
- Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.
- Hur, W., Moon, T., & Kim, H. (2020). When and how does customer engagement in CSR initiatives lead to greater CSR participation? The role of CSR credibility and customer–company identification. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1878-1891.
- Kilcullen, M., & Kooistra, J. O. (1999). At least do no harm: Sources on the changing role of business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Reference Services Review, 27(2), 158-178.
- Kotler, P., Roberto, E., & Hugo, H. (1991). Social marketing. Econ-Verlag.
- Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Best of breed: When it comes to gaining a market edge while supporting a social cause, “corporate social marketing” leads the pack. Social Marketing Quarterly, 11(3-4), 91-103.
- Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2015). The interactions of CSR, self-congruity and purchase intention among Chinese consumers. Australasian Marketing Journal, 23(1), 19-26.
- Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2018). Effects of multi-brand company’s CSR activities on purchase intention through a mediating role of corporate image and brand image. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 22(3), 387-403.
- Li, R., Kim, J., & Park, J. (2007). The effects of internet shoppers’ trust on their purchasing intention in China. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 4, 269-286.
- Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 57-72.
- Martínez, P., & del Bosque, I. R. (2013). CSR and customer loyalty: The roles of trust, customer identification with the company and satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35, 89-99.
- Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45-72.
- Mulaessa, N., & Wang, H. (2017). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on consumers purchase intention in China: Mediating role of consumer support for responsible business. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 9(1), 73-81.
- Naushad, M. (2018). A study on the antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions among Saudi students. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3), 600-617.
- Ng, M. (2022). The impact of corporate social responsibility expectations on purchase intention of social enterprise products. Social Enterprise Journal, 18(4), 585-604.
- Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Gruber, V. (2011). “Why don’t consumers care about CSR?”: A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 449-460.
- Oney, E., Oksuzoglu Guven, G., & Hussain Rizvi, W. (2017). The determinants of electronic payment systems usage from consumers’ perspective. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 394-415.
- Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 117-135.
- Peña-García, N., Gil-Saura, I., Rodríguez-Orejuela, A., & Siqueira-Junior, J. (2020). Purchase intention and purchase behavior online: A cross-cultural approach. Heliyon, 6(6), e04284.
- Petkus, E., & Woodruff, R. B. (1992). A model of the socially responsible decision-making process in marketing: Linking decision makers and stakeholders. In C. T. Allen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Winter Educators’ Conference (pp. 154-161). American Marketing Association.
- Poddar, A., Narula, S. A., & Zutshi, A. (2019). A study of corporate social responsibility practices of the top Bombay Stock Exchange 500 companies in India and their alignment with the sustainable development goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1184-1205.
- Sarstedt, M., Hair Jr, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197-211.
- Servera-Francés, D., & Arteaga-Moreno, F. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the customer commitment and trust in the retail sector. Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics, 6, 161-178.
- Sharma, V., Poulose, J., Mohanta, S., & Antony, L. E. (2018). Influence of the dimensions of CSR activities on consumer purchase intention. Innovative Marketing, 14(1), 23-32.
- Shiau, W.-L., & Chau, P. Y. (2016). Understanding behavioral intention to use a cloud computing classroom: A multiple model comparison approach. Information and Management, 53(3), 355-365.
- Turcsanyi, J., & Sisaye, S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and its link to financial performance: Application to Johnson & Johnson, a pharmaceutical company. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 10(1), 4-18.
- Vera-Martínez, J., Alvarado-Herrera, A., & Currás-Pérez, R. (2022). Do consumers really care about aspects of corporate social responsibility when developing attitudes toward a brand? Journal of Global Marketing, 35(3), 193-207.
- Vu, D. M., Ha, N. T., Ngo, T. V. N., Pham, H. T., & Duong, C. D. (2022). Environmental corporate social responsibility initiatives and green purchase intention: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(8), 1627-1645.
- Wang, S., Liao, Y.-K., Wu, W.-Y., & Le, K. B. H. (2021). The role of corporate social responsibility perceptions in brand equity, brand credibility, brand reputation, and purchase intentions. Sustainability, 13(21), 11975.
- Yu, W., Han, X., Ding, L., & He, M. (2021). Organic food corporate image and customer co-developing behavior: The mediating role of consumer trust and purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102377.
- Zhang, Q., & Ahmad, S. (2021). Analysis of corporate social responsibility execution effects on purchase intention with the moderating role of customer awareness. Sustainability, 13(8), 4548.
- Zhuang, M., Zhu, W., Huang, L., & Pan, W. (2022). Research of influence mechanism of corporate social responsibility for smart cities on consumers’ purchasing intention. Library Hi Tech, 40(5), 1147-1158.
-
The relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: accounting for endogeneity
Hyunjung Choi , Byungchul Choi ,
Jungyoon Byun
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.06
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 69-84 Views: 4329 Downloads: 493 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study examines the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and earnings management after controlling for endogeneity of CSR. Using a sample of non-financial firms listed on Korean Securities Market between 2002 and 2010, this study finds that ignoring endogeneity biases the estimated relation between CSR and earnings management. Specifically, the results show that the negative and significant relation between CSR commitment and discretionary accruals reported in the previous studies becomes insignificant. However, the negative and significant relation between CSR commitment and real activities manipulation remains significant even when the endogeneity of CSR commitment is taken into account. Therefore, this study provides evidence that proactive CSR engagement significantly affects firm’s practice of real activities manipulation, while it does not affect its practice of discretionary accruals. These results indicate that CSR commitment leads managers to be more responsible in management of operational activities than in accruals management.
-
Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?
Patrick Velte 
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.02
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 19-35 Views: 4180 Downloads: 1609 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯCorporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting plays a key role in management control, particularly in light of the increased demand for non-financial reporting after the financial crisis of 2008–2009. This literature review evaluates 47 empirical studies that concentrate on the influence of several board composition variables on the quantity and quality of CSR reporting. The author briefly introduces the research framework that underpins current empirical studies in this field. This is followed by a discussion of the main variables of board composition: (1) committees (audit and CSR committees), (2) board independence, (3) board expertise, (4) CEO duality, (5) board diversity (gender and foreign diversity), (6) board activity, and (7) board size. The author, then, summarizes the key findings, discusses the limitations of the existing research and offers useful recommendations for researchers, firm practice and regulators.
-
Green product buying intentions among young consumers: extending the application of theory of planned behavior
Andhy Setyawan ,
Noermijati Noermijati ,
Sunaryo Sunaryo ,
Siti Aisjah
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.13
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 145-154 Views: 2862 Downloads: 948 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis research reveals the factors explaining the purchase intention toward green products among young consumers. Young consumers are beginner consumers who are going to play an important role to take a responsibility in preserving the environment. Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is selected as the main theoretical framework in this research alongside some other variables (environmental concern, environmental knowledge, and willingness to pay), which are added in the research model to expand TPB application. Three hundred and twenty-six respondents were interviewed through a survey and the data are analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).
The findings illustrated that not every explanatory variable influenced the purchase intention toward green products among young consumers. Environmental concern and attitude did not influence the purchase intention toward green products among young consumers.
