R&D expenditure as a determinant of the aggregate innovation index in the V4 countries
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.19(2).2023.08
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2023, Issue #2, pp. 87-100
- Cited by
- 478 Views
-
208 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Innovation is critical to modern economies’ development; new process requirements within Industry 4.0 highlight its significance and necessity. This study aims to identify the relationship between R&D expenditure and the aggregate innovation index in the V4 countries. The statistical data from 2014 to 2021 are taken from the European Commission and Eurostat databases. The analysis focuses on identifying the degree of correlation between the standardized score of the Aggregate Innovation Index and the amount of R&D expenditure in countries of the Visegrad Group. The study uses the following methods: the Shapiro-Wilk test (to verify the normality of the samples), Pearson’s correlation coefficient (to check the degree of tightness of dependency), the Tukey test (to examine which countries have statistically significant differences), and chi-squared test (Χ2-test). Among the V4 countries, the Czech Republic was the best performer in the aggregate innovation index. Hungary showed the second-highest score, Slovakia ranked third place, and Poland had the lowest score. The findings indicate a positive correlation between R&D expenditures and the aggregate innovation index in all V4 countries. However, the relationship is statistically significant only in the Czech Republic and Poland. These results were confirmed by the Tukey test of differences within the correlation coefficients, which showed only a statistically significant difference within the correlation coefficients between Poland and Slovakia (1.790) and between Poland and Hungary (–1.640), respectively.
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic [grant VEGA No 1/0357/21], “Multiplier effects of human capital quality on economic performance and competitiveness of the Slovak economy.”
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O10, O30, O32, O33
-
References44
-
Tables6
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Development of Aggregate Innovation Index and R&D expenditure in V4 countries
- Figure 2. Correlation analysis – Slovakia
- Figure 3. Correlation analysis – Czechia
- Figure 4. Correlation analysis – Poland
- Figure 5. Correlation analysis – Hungary
-
- Table 1. Test statistics – Slovakia
- Table 2. Test statistics – Czechia
- Table 3. Test statistics – Poland
- Table 4. Test statistics – Hungary
- Table 5. Correlation coefficients compliance test
- Table 6. Tukey test of differences in correlation coefficients
-
- Augustia, D., Permatasari, Y., Fauzi, H., & Sari, M. N. A. (2020). Research and development intensity, firm performance, and green product innovation. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 1-11.
- Bigliardi, B., & Filippelli, S. (2022). Sustainability and open innovation: Main themes and research trajectories. Sustainability, 14(11), 6763.
- Bitencourt, C. C., Santini, F. O., Zanandrea, G., Froehlich, C., & Ladeira, W. J. (2020). Empirical generalizations in eco-innovation: A meta-analytic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118721.
- Bossle, M. B., De Barcellos, M. D., & Vieira, L. M. (2016). Why food companies go green? The determinant factors to adopt eco-innovations. British Food Journal, 118(6), 1317-1333.
- Chesbrough, H., Lettl, C., & Ritter, T. (2018). Value creation and value capture in open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation, 35(6), 930-938.
- Civelek, M., Ključnikov, A., Fialova, V., Folvarčná, A., & Stoch, M. (2021). Major obstacles in innovative activities of family-owned SMEs: Evidence from Czechia. Economics and Sociology, 14(2), 137-149.
- Dworak, E. (2020). The innovation gap between the Polish economy and the European Union. Comparative economic research. Central and Eastern Europe, 23(3), 63-73.
- Ebersberger, B., Bloch, C., Sverre, J. H., & Van de Velde, E. (2012). Open innovation practices and their effect on innovation performance. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 9(6), 1250040.
- Eriksson, C., Linden, J., & Papahristodoulou, C. (2022). Human capital, innovation, and growth. International Journal of Economic Theory.
- European Commission & Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2022). European Innovation Scoreboard 2022. Methodology Report.
- European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Hollanders, H., Es-Sadki, N., & Khalilova, A. (2022). European Innovation Scoreboard 2022. Publications Office of the European Union.
- European Commission. (2021, June 22). European Innovation Scoreboard 2021 published.
- Eurostat. (2023). Stats finder A-Z.
- Garbuz, V., & Topala, P. (2017). Economic mechanisms of influence on the development of human capital trained in research. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 227, 012048.
- Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110-132.
- García-Sánchez, I. M., Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Zafra-Gómez, J. L. (2020). Do the ecoinnovation and ecodesign strategies generate value added in munificent environments? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1021-1033.
- Gavurova, B., Schönfeld, J., Bilan, Y., & Dudas, T. (2022). Study of the differences in the perception of the use of the principles of corporate social responsibility in micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in the V4 Countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 14(2), 23-40.
- Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Parrilli, M. D., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Sempere-Ripol, F. (2021). The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU. Research Policy, 50(9), 104316.
- Horbach, J., Rammer, Ch., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact – The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112-122.
- Humbatova, S. I., & Hajiyev, N. G. (2019). The role of spending on education and science in sustainable development. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2), 1704-1727.
- Janoskova, K., & Kral, P. (2019). An in-depth analysis of the summary innovation index in the V4 Countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 11(2), 68-83.
- Khattak, A. (2023). Are environmental sustainability thoughts a panacea for environmental performance? Social innovation and moderating role of green innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science.
- Klewitz, J., & Hansen, G. E. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57-75.
- Ključnikov, A., Civelek, M., Červinka, M., Vozňáková, I., & Vincúrová, Z. (2022). The role of SMEs’ innovativeness and competitiveness in their financial risk management concerns. Journal of Competitiveness, 14(4), 97-116.
- Leite, D. W., & Cardoso, L. C. B. (2023). Human capital and technology in the growth of economic structure. Investigacion Economica, 82(323), 27-52.
- Lewandowska, A., & Stopa, M. (2020). The impact of innovative professional qualifications on the sense of employment security: Evidence from Poland. Economics and Sociology, 13(3), 72-83.
- Lewandowska, A., Bilan, Y., & Mentel, G. (2021). The impact of financial innovation investment support on SME competitiveness. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(3), 92-110.
- Markechová, D., Stehlíková, B., & Tirpáková, A. (2011). Štatistické metódy a ich aplikácie. Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre. (In Slovak).
- Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Palacios-Manzano, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: An empirical research in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 2374-2383.
- Musa, H., Musová, Z., & Debnárová, L. (2018). Importance of corporate governance in socially responsible behaviour of enterprises. Entrepreneurship – Development Tendencies and Empirical Approach.
- Onea, I. A. (2020). Innovation indicators and the innovation process – Evidence from the European Innovation scoreboard. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 15(4), 605-620.
- Parrilli, M. D., Balavac-Orlić, M., & Radicic, D. (2023). Environmental innovation across SMEs in Europe. Technovation, 119, 102541.
- Reznakova, M., & Stefankova, S. (2022). New indicators of innovation activity in economic growth models. Journal of Competitiveness, 14(3), 153-172.
- Robertson, J., Caruana, A., & Ferreira, C. (2023). Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems. International Business Review, 32(2), 101866.
- Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Białek, J. (2017). Evaluation of the EU countries’ innovative potential – Multivariate approach. Statistics in Transition New Series, 18(1), 167-180.
- Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Białek, J. (2019). Measurement of the average innovativeness change over time in the EU member states. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(2), 268-293.
- Rozsa, Z., Belás, J. Jr., Khurram Ajaz, K., & Zvaríková, K. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and essential factors of personnel risk management in SMEs. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 449-463.
- Runiewicz-Wardyn, M. (2009). Evaluating and comparing the innovative performance of the United States and the European Union (CES Working Papers Series, 172).
- Sica, E. (2018). Defining eco-innovations: Characteristics, typologies and socioeconomic approaches. In Firms, finance and sustainable transitions. The financial constraints of eco-innovation companies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Sokolov-Mladenović, S., Cvetanović, S., & Mladenović, I. (2016). R&D expenditure and economic growth: EU28 evidence for the period 2002–2012. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 29(1), 1005-1020.
- Sun, J., Cai, K., & Shen, H. (2022). Pandemics and human capital: Panel data evidence from 122 countries. Frontiers in Public Health, 10.
- Taylor, S. P. (2017). What is innovation? A study of the definitions, academic models and applicability of innovation to an example of social housing in England. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(11), 128-146.
- Teslenko, V., Melnikov, R., & Bazin, D. (2021). Evaluation of the impact of human capital oninnovation activity in Russian regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 8(1), 109-126.
- Xiao, D., & Su, J. (2022). Macroeconomic lockdown effects of COVID 19 on small business in China: Empirical insights from SEM technique. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(42), 63344-63356.