Interactive and personalized digital communication: Key predictors of political participation intention in young Moroccans
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.21(2).2025.21
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2025, Issue #2, pp. 260-275
- 42 Views
-
5 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Through a quantitative lens, this study examines the effect of interactivity and personalization in digital communication on young individuals’ political participation intentions within a non-Western context, specifically among Moroccan youth. Furthermore, it evaluates the mediating roles of attitude and perceived behavioral control. Adopting a positivist epistemological stance, the study utilized an online survey disseminated via social media. Data were collected during a post-election period in Morocco, a time marked by significant political engagement on social media. Subsequently, a purposive sample of 423 respondents was analyzed using Partial Least Squares regression. The findings reveal a positive and significant effect of both interactivity (p < 0.01; β = 0.363) and personalization (p < 0.01; β = 0.333) on young Moroccans’ political attitudes. However, interactivity exhibited the largest effect. While personalization had a positive effect, only professionally-oriented communications resonated, challenging broader notions of personalization’s universal positive effect on political attitudes. Additionally, perceived behavioral control was positively affected mainly by personalization (p < 0.01; β = 0.200), yet its variance was minimally explained (R² = 0.092) by digital communication features alone, suggesting that other political determinants are at play. Furthermore, both political attitude and perceived behavioral control significantly predicted political participation intentions, with perceived behavioral control demonstrating a stronger effect. Finally, mediation analysis confirmed that personalized interactive communication indirectly stimulates political participation intention through both attitude and perceived behavioral control (p < 0.05). These results extend existing models, highlighting the critical role of interactivity and personalization in shaping youth political participation intention in the Moroccan context.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M31, M37
-
References51
-
Tables10
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research model
- Figure 2. Validated research model
-
- Table 1. Demographic profile of respondents
- Table 2. Synthesis of constructs and items after purification
- Table 3. Fornell-Larcker criterion
- Table 4. Cross-loading criterion
- Table 5. Direct effect
- Table 6. R-squared
- Table 7. Stone-Geisser Q² coefficient
- Table 8. GoF
- Table 9. Indirect effect and bootstrapped confidence interval
- Table A1. Synthesis of constructs and items
-
- Alalwan, A. A. (2018). Investigating the impact of social media advertising features on customer purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 65-77.
- Ali, H., Ali, T., Matar, Z., & Jawad, F. (2015). Citizens’ acceptance and readiness towards adopting e-participation tools in kingdom of Bahrain. International Journal for Infonomics, 8(2), 1029-1036.
- Angot, J., & Milano, P. (2005). Comment lier concepts et données. Recherches En Soins Infirmiers, 1, 12-27.
- Arora, T., Agarwal, B., & Kumar, A. (2018). A study of millennials’ preferences for social media advertising in Delhi NCR. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(10), 34-51.
- Auter, Z. J., & Fine, J. A. (2018). Social media campaigning: Mobilization and fundraising on Facebook. Social Science Quarterly, 99(1), 185-200.
- Bachar, R., & Majdi, T. (2022). Impact de la personnalisation en marketing politique dans les reseaux sociaux sur l’image de marque des leaders politiques chez les jeunes au Maroc [Impact of Personalization in Political Marketing on Social Media on the Brand Image of Political Leaders among Young People in Morocco]. Revue Francaise d’Economie et de Gestion [French Journal of Economics and Management], 3(5), 502-527.
- Badreddine, E.-K. (2022). Le marketing politique au Maroc à l’épreuve du profesionnalisme: Conception et supports de commercialisation [Political Marketing in Morocco: Testing Professionalism: Design and Marketing Support]. Journal of Integrated Studies in Economics, Law, Technical Sciences & Communication, 1(1).
- Balmas, M., Rahat, G., Sheafer, T., & Shenhav, S. R. (2014). Two routes to personalized politics: Centralized and decentralized personalization. Party Politics, 20(1), 37-51.
- Barreda, A. A., Bilgihan, A., Nusair, K., & Okumus, F. (2016). Online branding: Development of hotel branding through interactivity theory. Tourism Management, 57, 180-192.
- Baumard, P., Donada, C., Ibert, J., & Xuereb, J.-M. (2014). Chapitre 9. La collecte des données et la gestion de leurs sources. In Méthodes de recherche en management (Vol. 4, pp. 261-296). Dunod.
- Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707-731.
- Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
- Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
- Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
- Choi, J.-C., & Song, C. (2020). Factors explaining why some citizens engage in E-participation, while others do not. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101524.
- Churchill, G. A., & Iacobucci, D. (2006). Marketing research: Methodological foundations (Vol. 199, Issue 1). New York: Dryden Press.
- Croutsche, J.-J. (2009). Analyse des données en marketing, en management et en sciences sociales: Conceptualisation et applications [Data analysis in marketing, management and socias sciences: conceptualization and applications]. Eska.
- de Jong, M. D., Neulen, S., & Jansma, S. R. (2019). Citizens’ intentions to participate in governmental co-creation initiatives: Comparing three co-creation configurations. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 490-500.
- Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757-774.
- Farkas, X., & Bene, M. (2021). Images, politicians, and social media: Patterns and effects of politicians’ image-based political communication strategies on social media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 119-142.
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology press.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
- Greijdanus, H., de Matos Fernandes, C. A., Turner-Zwinkels, F., Honari, A., Roos, C. A., Rosenbusch, H., & Postmes, T. (2020). The psychology of online activism and social movements: Relations between online and offline collective action. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 49-54.
- Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
- Hong, S., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 777-782.
- Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.
- Jiang, Z., Chan, J., Tan, B. C., & Chua, W. S. (2010). Effects of interactivity on website involvement and purchase intention. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 11(1).
- Khan, S., Umer, R., Umer, S., & Naqvi, S. (2021). Antecedents of trust in using social media for E-government services: An empirical study in Pakistan. Technology in Society, 64, 101400.
- Kim, B., & Kim, Y. (2019). Facebook versus Instagram: How perceived gratifications and technological attributes are related to the change in social media usage. The Social Science Journal, 56(2), 156-167.
- Kim, M., Chang, Y., Park, M.-C., & Lee, J. (2015). The effects of service interactivity on the satisfaction and the loyalty of smartphone users. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 949-960.
- Koc-Michalska, K., Lilleker, D. G., Smith, A., & Weissmann, D. (2016). The normalization of online campaigning in the web. 2.0 era. European Journal of Communication, 31(3), 331-350.
- La Barbera, F., & Ajzen, I. (2020). Control interactions in the theory of planned behavior: Rethinking the role of subjective norm. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 401.
- Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2018). Citizens’e-participation on agenda setting in local governance: Do individual social capital and e-participation management matter? Public Management Review, 20(6), 873-895.
- Lemay, D. J., Doleck, T., & Bazelais, P. (2019). Context and technology use: Opportunities and challenges of the situated perspective in technology acceptance research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2450-2465.
- Mazzoleni, G., & Bracciale, R. (2018). Socially mediated populism: The communicative strategies of political leaders on Facebook. Palgrave Communications, 4(1).
- McGregor, S. C. (2018). Personalization, social media, and voting: Effects of candidate self-personalization on vote intention. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1139-1160.
- Metz, M., Kruikemeier, S., & Lecheler, S. (2020). Personalization of politics on Facebook: Examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1481-1498.
- Morozov, E. (2009). The brave new world of slacktivism. Foreign Policy, 19(05).
- Ohme, J. (2019). When digital natives enter the electorate: Political social media use among first-time voters and its effects on campaign participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(2), 119-136.
- Parmelee, J. H., Perkins, S. C., & Beasley, B. (2023). Personalization of politicians on Instagram: What Generation Z wants to see in political posts. Information, Communication & Society, 26(9), 1773-1788.
- Pedersen, H. H. (2022). Party soldiers on personal platforms? Politicians’ personalized use of social media. Party Politics, 13540688221140252.
- Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research.
- Rahat, G., & Sheafer, T. (2007). The personalization (s) of politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Political Communication, 24(1), 65-80.
- Sahari, N., Zainal Abidin, N., Kasimin, H., & Mohd Idris, H. (2012). Malaysian e-Government application: Factors of actual use. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(12), 325-334.
- Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2014). PLS-SEM: Looking back and moving forward. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 132-137.
- Sharma, N., Khatri, B., Khan, S. A., & Shamsi, M. S. (2023). Extending the UTAUT model to examine the influence of social media on tourists’ destination selection. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 47-64.
- Shipps, B., & Phillips, B. (2013). Social networks, interactivity and satisfaction: Assessing socio-technical behavioral factors as an extension to technology acceptance. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 8(1), 35-52.
- Thietart, R.-A. (2014). Méthodes de recherche en management [Research methods in management]. Dunod.
- Van Santen, R., & Van Zoonen, L. (2010). The personal in political television biographies. Biography, 46-67.
- Xenos, M. A., Macafee, T., & Pole, A. (2017). Understanding variations in user response to social media campaigns: A study of Facebook posts in the 2010 US elections. New Media & Society, 19(6), 826-842.
- Yang, F., & Shen, F. (2018). Effects of web interactivity: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 45(5), 635-658.