Understanding the interplay of psychological and contextual factors in green consumer behavior
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.21(4).2025.04
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2025, Issue #4, pp. 45-59
- 18 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
This research explores the factors that contribute to green consumer behavior in an emerging market setting, highlighting the growing importance of sustainability-related consumption studies. The main objective of the study is to uncover how psychological and contextual elements combine to foster pro-environmental behavior among consumers in Tunisia. Utilizing an extended framework based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and key concepts from green consumer research, this study examines survey responses from 409 participants, collected through an online survey administered to Tunisian consumers active in online shopping communities during March and April 2025, and analyzes them using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis with the fsQCA 4.1 software. This method enables the discovery of various pathways leading to green consumer behavior, considering causal complexity and the possibility of multiple solutions. The results of this study show that consumer green behavior is achieved through five different configurations. Perceived behavioral control and trust in eco-labels are found to be core conditions across most solutions, while subjective norms are largely absent or irrelevant in most configurations. This research highlights the importance of using a configurational approach in studying sustainable behavior, as it captures the different pathways through which consumers engage in pro-environmental behavior via multiple causal mechanisms. These insights are relevant for practitioners and policymakers by guiding the design of differentiated strategies that reflect the diversity of pathways to green consumption.
Acknowledgments
No funding or external support was received for the conduct of this research, and there are no specific acknowledgments to declare.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q01, M30, M31
-
References68
-
Tables5
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Configurational research model
-
- Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the respondents
- Table 2. Construct reliability, validity, and item loadings
- Table 3. Fornell-Larcker criterion
- Table 4. Truth table analysis results for green consumer behavior
- Table A1. Survey questions
-
- Agag, G., & Colmekcioglu, N. (2020). Understanding guests’ behavior to visit green hotels: The role of ethical ideology and religiosity. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102679.
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
- Alzubaidi, H., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Examining antecedents of consumers’ pro-environmental behaviours: TPB extended with materialism and innovativeness. Journal of Business Research, 122, 685-699.
- Amit Kumar, G. (2021). Framing a model for green buying behavior of Indian consumers: From the lenses of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126487.
- Bang, H. K., Ellinger, A. E., Hadjimarcou, J., & Traichal, P. A. (2000). Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychology and Marketing, 17(6), 449-468.
- Biswas, A., & Roy, M. (2015). Leveraging factors for sustained green consumption behavior based on consumption value perceptions: testing the structural model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, 332-340.
- Chen, M. F., & Tung, P. J. (2014). Developing an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 221-230.
- Chen, S. C., & Hung, C. W. (2016). Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 155-163.
- Choi, H.-Y., Jang, J., & Kandampully, J. (2015). Application of the Extended VBN Theory to Understand Consumers’ Decisions About Green Hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 87-95.
- Dagher, G. K., & Itani, O. S. (2014). Factors Influencing Green Purchasing Behaviour: Empirical Evidence From the Lebanese Consumers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(3), 188-195.
- Daugbjerg, C., Smed, S., Andersen, L. M., & Schvartzman, Y. (2014). Improving Eco-labelling as an Environmental Policy Instrument: Knowledge, Trust and Organic Consumption. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 16(4), 559-575.
- Davies, J., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. (2002). Beyond the Intention–Behaviour Mythology. Marketing Theory, 2(1), 29-113.
- Dermody, J., Koenig-Lewis, N., Zhao, A. L., & Hanmer-Lloyd, S. (2018). Appraising the Influence of Pro-Environmental Self-Identity on Sustainable Consumption Buying and Curtailment in Emerging Markets: Evidence From China and Poland. Journal of Business Research, 86, 333-343.
- Donato, C., & Adıgüzel, F. (2022). Visual Complexity of Eco-Labels and Product Evaluations in Online Setting: Is Simple Always Better? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 102961.
- Dul, J. (2016). Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1516-1523.
- Ertz, M., Karakaş, F., & Sarigöllü, E. (2016). Exploring Pro-Environmental Behaviors of Consumers: An Analysis of Contextual Factors, Attitude, and Behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3971-3980.
- Fryxell, G. E., & Lo, C. W. H. (2003). The Influence of Environmental Knowledge and Values on Managerial Behaviours on Behalf of the Environment: An Empirical Examination of Managers in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 45-69.
- Geremew, Y. M., Huang, W. J., & Hung, K. (2024). Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis as a Mixed-Method and Analysis Technique: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. Journal of Travel Research, 63(1), 3-26.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2008). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Hsu, C., Chang, C.-Y., & Yansritakul, C. (2017). Exploring Purchase Intention of Green Skincare Products Using the Theory of Planned Behavior: Testing the Moderating Effects of Country of Origin and Price Sensitivity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 145-152.
- International Standards Organization (ISO). (1999). Environmental labels and declarations – Type I environmental labelling – Principles and procedures (Patent No. 14024). ISO Central Secretariat.
- Jang, Y. J., Kim, W. G., & Lee, H. (2015). Coffee Shop Consumers’ Emotional Attachment and Loyalty to Green Stores: The Moderating Role of Green Consciousness. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 44, 146-156.
- Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1-2), 128-143.
- Khan, S. A. R., Sheikh, A. A., Ashraf, M., & Yu, Z. (2022). Improving Consumer-Based Green Brand Equity: The Role of Healthy Green Practices, Green Brand Attachment, and Green Skepticism. Sustainability, 14(19).
- Kim, N., & Lee, K. (2023). Environmental Consciousness, Purchase Intention, and Actual Purchase Behavior of Eco-Friendly Products: The Moderating Impact of Situational Context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(7), 5312.
- Koo, C., Chung, N., & Nam, K.-C. (2015). Assessing the Impact of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivators on Smart Green IT Device Use: Reference Group Perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 64-79.
- Kopplin, C. S., & Rösch, S. F. (2021). Equifinal causes of sustainable clothing purchase behavior: An fsQCA analysis among generation Y. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63.
- Kozar, J. M., & Connell, K. Y. H. (2013). Socially and environmentally responsible apparel consumption: Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(2), 316-325.
- Kumar, B., Manrai, A. K., & Manrai, L. A. (2017). Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: A conceptual framework and empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 1-9.
- Kumar, S., Sahoo, S., Lim, W. M., Kraus, S., & Bamel, U. (2022). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121599.
- Lai, C. C., & Chang, C. E. (2020). Clothing Disposal Behavior of Taiwanese Consumers with Respect to Environmental Protection and Sustainability. Sustainability, 12(22), 9445.
- Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., & Kvasova, O. (2010). Antecedents and outcomes of consumer environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(13-14), 1319-1344.
- Liao, C., & Li, H. (2019). Environmental Education, Knowledge, and High School Students’ Intention toward Separation of Solid Waste on Campus. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), 1659.
- Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114-121.
- Liu, X., Wang, C., Shishime, T., & Fujitsuka, T. (2012). Sustainable consumption: Green purchasing behaviours of urban residents in China. Sustainable Development, 20(4), 293-308.
- Mahardika, H., Thomas, D., Ewing, M. T., & Japutra, A. (2020). Comparing the temporal stability of behavioural expectation and behavioural intention in the prediction of consumers pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 101943.
- Moser, A. K. (2015). Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro - Environmental purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(3), 167-175.
- Nimri, R., Patiar, A., & Jin, X. (2020). The determinants of consumers’ intention of purchasing green hotel accommodation: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45, 535-543.
- Olya, H., & Akhshik, A. (2018). Tackling the Complexity of the Pro-Environmental Behavior Intentions of Visitors to Turtle Sites. Journal of Travel Research, 58(2), 313-332.
- Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58.
- Park, H. J., & Lin, L. M. (2020). Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of Business Research, 117, 623-628.
- Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. D. (2016). Predicting Green Product Consumption Using Theory of Planned Behavior and Reasoned Action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123-134.
- Pellegrini Masini, G. (2007). The carbon-saving behaviour of residential households. In Futures of Cities - 51st IFHP World Congress.
- Peluso, A. M., Pichierri, M., & Pino, G. (2021). Age-Related Effects on Environmentally Sustainable Purchases at the Time of COVID-19: Evidence From Italy. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, 102443.
- Polonsky, M. J., Vocino, A., Grau, S. L., Garma, R., & Ferdous, A. S. (2012). The impact of general and carbon-related environmental knowledge on attitudes and behaviour of US consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3-4), 238-263.
- Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1-15.
- Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
- Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P. C. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. In Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond (pp. 190-212). University of Chicago Press.
- Rausch, T. M., & Kopplin, C. S. (2021). Bridge the gap: Consumers’ purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123882.
- Rex, E., & Baumann, H. (2007). Beyond ecolabels: what green marketing can learn from conventional marketing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(6), 567-576.
- Rokka, J., & Uusitalo, L. (2008). Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices – Do consumers care? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 516-525.
- Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1982). Helping and cooperation: a self-based motivational model. In Cooperation and helping behavior (pp. 327-353). Elsevier.
- Sigurðsson, V., Larsen, N. M., Folwarczny, M., Fagerstrøm, A., Menon, R. G. V, & Sigurdardottir, F. T. (2023). The Importance of Relative Customer-Based Label Equity When Signaling Sustainability and Health With Certifications and Tags. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113338.
- Silva, M. D., Wang, P., & Kuah, A. T. (2021). Why Wouldn’t Green Appeal Drive Purchase Intention? Moderation Effects of Consumption Values in the UK and China. Journal of Business Research, 122, 713-724.
- Soomro, Y. A., Hameed, I., Bhutto, M. Y., Waris, I., Baeshen, Y., & Batati, B. Al. (2022). What Influences Consumers to Recycle Solid Waste? An Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2).
- Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 322-348.
- Taufique, K. M. R., Vocino, A., & Polonsky, M. J. (2017). The influence of eco-label knowledge and trust on pro-environmental consumer behaviour in an emerging market. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(7), 511-529.
- Trong Nguyen, L., Nguyen, T. H., Ngoc Nguyen, H., Dai Nguyen, L., Thi Thu Nguyen, D., & Duy LE, L. (2023). Determinants of green consumer behavior: A case study from Vietnam. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1).
- Varshneya, G., Pandey, S. K., & Das, G. (2017). Impact of Social Influence and Green Consumption Values on Purchase Intention of Organic Clothing: A Study on Collectivist Developing Economy. Global Business Review, 18(2), 478-492.
- Wal, A. J. van der, Horen, F. v., & Grinstein, A. (2018). Temporal Myopia in Sustainable Behavior Under Uncertainty. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(3), 378-393.
- Wang, J., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Li, J., & Zhao, D. (2018). Extending the theory of planned behavior to understand consumers’ intentions to visit green hotels in the Chinese context. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(8), 2810-2825.
- Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D., Yang, S., & Fu, Y. (2016). Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation, 43(1), 123-143.
- Wang, X., Zhu, H., Jiang, D., Xia, S., & Xiao, C. (2023). “Facilitators” vs “Substitutes”: The Influence of Artificial Intelligence Products’ Image on Consumer Evaluation. Nankai Business Review International, 14(1), 177-193.
- Wang, Y., Kung, L. A., Gupta, S., & Ozdemir, S. (2019). Leveraging Big Data Analytics to Improve Quality of Care in Healthcare Organizations: A Configurational Perspective. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 362-388.
- Wei, S., Ang, T., & Jancenelle, V. E. (2018). Willingness to pay more for green products: The interplay of consumer characteristics and customer participation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 45, 230-238.
- Xu, X., & Gürsoy, D. (2015). Influence of Sustainable Hospitality Supply Chain Management on Customers’ Attitudes and Behaviors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 49, 105-116.
- Yeow, P. H. P., & Loo, W. H. (2022). Antecedents of green computer purchase behavior among Malaysian consumers from the perspective of rational choice and moral norm factors. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 550-561.
- Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 20-31.


