Precious metals as hedging assets: Evidence from MENA countries
-
Received December 24, 2023;Accepted January 23, 2024;Published February 5, 2024
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6138-3098
,
Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8282-6604,
Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1781-7036 -
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(1).2024.13
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2024, Issue #1, pp. 157-167
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 560 Views
-
191 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In the context of the global pandemic of 2020 and the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, a newfound interest is emerging in understanding the interconnections between the Dow Jones (United States), Amman SE General (Jordan), BLSI (Lebanon), EGX 30 (Egypt), ISRAEL TA 125 (Israel), MASI (Morocco), and MOEX (Russia) indices and the precious metals markets Gold Bullion LBM, Silver, Handy & Harman, London Platinum, from January 1, 2018 to November 23, 2023. The study aimed to determine whether precious metals such as Gold, Silver, and Platinum can be considered hedging assets to the stock markets of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries, i.e., whether investors operating in these regional markets can rebalance their portfolios with these precious metals. The structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) methodology allowed assessing the influence of the analyzed markets on each other regarding price formation. The results show that the markets interacted very significantly during the stress period. Platinum was the market that most influenced its peers (1 to 8 comovements), the MOEX, 1 to 7, MASI, 2 to 6, the Dow Jones went from 4 to 7 comovements, the Amman SE General and EGX 30 markets went from 1 to 4, the Israeli market (ISRAEL TA 125) and Silver went from 2 to 4 comovements, and finally the Gold Bullion LBM from 3 to 4. The study’s conclusions contain important information for investors, policymakers, and other participants in the financial energy markets.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the comments and suggestions from reviewers that helped improve the quality of the manuscript. Rui Dias is pleased to acknowledge the financial support from Instituto Superior de Gestão (ISG) [ISG - Business & Economics School], CIGEST.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G10, G11, C32
-
References35
-
Tables6
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Evolution, in levels, of the fluctuations of the markets analyzed from January 1, 2018 to November 23, 2023
- Figure 2. VAR structural residuals using Cholesky (d.f. adjusted) factors, for the Tranquil subperiod
- Figure 3. VAR structural residuals using Cholesky (d.f. adjusted) factors, for the stress subperiod
-
- Table 1. Summary statistics for the markets studied from January 1, 2018 to November 23, 2023
- Table 2. Summary statistics for the markets analyzed from January 1, 2018 to November 23, 2023
- Table 3. Summary table of the unit root tests for the markets analyzed from January 1, 2018 to November 23, 2023
- Table 4. Granger causality/Block Exogeneity Wald tests, Tranquil subperiod
- Table 5. Granger causality/Block Exogeneity Wald tests, stress subperiod
- Table 6. Summary table of the Granger causality/Block Exogeneity Wald tests for the tranquil and stress subperiods
-
- Agyeh-Ampamoh, S., Gounopoulos, D., & Mazouz, K. (2014). Does Gold offer a better protection against sovereign debt crisis than other metals? Banking and Finance, 40.
- Bahloul, S., Mroua, M., & Naifar, N. (2023). Re–evaluating the hedge and safe–haven properties of Islamic indexes, Gold and Bitcoin: evidence from DCC–GARCH and quantile models. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.
- Baur, D. G., & McDermott, T. K. (2010). Is Gold a safe haven? International evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(8), 1886-1898.
- Bouri, E., Shahzad, S. J. H., Roubaud, D., Kristoufek, L., & Lucey, B. (2020). Bitcoin, Gold, and commodities as safe havens for stocks: New insight through wavelet analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 77, 156-164.
- Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics.
- Chambino, M., Manuel, R., Dias, T., & Horta, N. R. (2023). Asymmetric efficiency of cryptocurrencies during the 2020 and 2022 events. Economic Analysis Letters, 2(March), 23-33.
- Chemkha, R., BenSaïda, A., Ghorbel, A., & Tayachi, T. (2021). Hedge and safe haven properties during COVID-19: Evidence from Bitcoin and Gold. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 82.
- Chkili, W. (2022). The links between Gold, oil prices and Islamic stock markets in a regime switching environment. Eurasian Economic Review, 12(1).
- Dee, J., Li, L., & Zheng, Z. (2013). Is Gold a hedge or a safe haven Evidence from inflation and stock market. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 2(1).
- Dias, R., Alexandre, P., Teixeira, N., & Chambino, M. (2023). Clean Energy Stocks: Resilient Safe Havens in the Volatility of Dirty Cryptocurrencies. Energies, 16(13).
- Dias, R., Chambino, M., & Horta, N. (2023). Short-Term Shocks Between Central European Stock Markets: An Approach. Journal of Economic Analysis, 2(March), 80-93.
- Dias, R., Horta, N., & Chambino, M. (2023a). Clean Energy Action Index Efficiency: An Analysis in Global Uncertainty Contexts. Energies 2023, 16, 18.
- Dias, R., Horta, N. R., & Chambino, M. (2023b). Portfolio rebalancing in times of stress: Capital markets vs. Commodities. Journal of Economic Analysis, 9(1), 129-151.
- Dickey, D., & Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
- Ghazali, M. F. (2010). Is Gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis of stocks, bonds and Gold. Financial Review, 45(2), 217-229.
- Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424.
- Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111-120.
- Guedes, E. F., Santos, R. P. C., Figueredo, L. H. R., Da Silva, P. A., Dias, R. M. T. S., & Zebende, G. F. (2022). Efficiency and Long–Range Correlation in G–20 Stock Indexes: A Sliding Windows Approach. Fluctuation and Noise Letters.
- He, Z., O’Connor, F., & Thijssen, J. (2018). Is Gold a Sometime Safe Haven or an Always Hedge for equity investors? A Markov–Switching CAPM approach for US and UK stock indices. International Review of Financial Analysis, 60.
- Houcine, B., Zouheyr, G., Abdessalam, B., Youcef, H., & Hanane, A. (2020). The relationship between crude oil prices, EUR/USD exchange rate and gold prices. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(5).
- Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters, 6(3), 255-259.
- Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics.
- Mensi, W., Maitra, D., Selmi, R., & Vo, X. V. (2023). Extreme dependencies and spillovers between gold and stock markets: evidence from MENA countries. Financial Innovation, 9(1).
- Pardal, P., Dias, R. T., Santos, H., & Vasco, C. (2021). Central European Banking Sector Integration and Shocks During the Global Pandemic (COVID–19). In Handbook of Research on Reinventing Economies and Organizations Following a Global Health Crisis (pp. 272-288).
- Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
- Pisedtasalasai, A. (2021). Hedging stocks in crises and market downturns with Gold and bonds: Industry analysis. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 11(1).
- Reboredo, J. C. (2013). Is Gold a safe haven or a hedge for the US dollar? Implications for risk management. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8), 2665-2676.
- Robiyanto, R. (2017). Testing Commodities as Safe Haven and Hedging Instrument on ASEAN’s Five Stock Markets. Jurnal Ekonomi Kuantitatif Terapan.
- Robiyanto, R. (2018). Testing of The Gold’s Role as a Safe Haven and Hedgefor Sharia Stocks in Indonesia. Al–Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah, 10(2).
- Robiyanto, R., Nugroho, B. A., Handriani, E., & Huruta, A. D. (2020). Hedge effectiveness of put replication, Gold, and oil on ASEAN-5 equities. Financial Innovation, 6(1).
- Saraç, M., & Zeren, F. (2014). Is gold investment an effective hedge against inflation and U.S. Dollar? Evidence from turkey. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 48(4).
- Teixeira Dias, R. M., Chambino, M., & Rebolo Horta, N. (2023). Long–Term Dependencies in Central European Stock Markets: A Crisp-Set Analysis. Economic Analysis Letters, 2(February), 10-17.
- Vasco, C., Pardal, P., & Dias, R. T. (2021). Do the Stock Market Indices Follow a Random Walk? In Handbook of Research on Financial Management During Economic Downturn and Recovery (pp. 389-410).
- Yang, C., Wang, X., & Gao, W. (2022). Is Bitcoin a better hedging and safe-haven investment than traditional assets against currencies? Evidence from the time-frequency domain approach. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 62.
- Yousaf, I., Plakandaras, V., Bouri, E., & Gupta, R. (2023). Hedge and safe–haven properties of FAANA against Gold, US Treasury, bitcoin, and US Dollar/CHF during the pandemic period. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 64.
-
-
Conceptualization
Rui Dias, Rosa Galvão, Paulo Alexandre
-
Data curation
Rui Dias, Rosa Galvão, Paulo Alexandre
-
Formal Analysis
Rui Dias, Rosa Galvão, Paulo Alexandre
-
Funding acquisition
Rui Dias, Rosa Galvão, Paulo Alexandre
-
Investigation
Rui Dias, Rosa Galvão, Paulo Alexandre
-
Methodology
Rui Dias, Rosa Galvão, Paulo Alexandre
-
Validation
Rui Dias, Rosa Galvão, Paulo Alexandre
-
Writing – original draft
Rui Dias, Rosa Galvão, Paulo Alexandre
-
Writing – review & editing
Rui Dias, Rosa Galvão, Paulo Alexandre
-
Resources
Rui Dias, Rosa Galvão, Paulo Alexandre
-
Conceptualization
-
Hedging and non-hedging trading strategies on commodities using the d-Backtest PS method. Optimized trading system hedging
Dimitrios Th. Vezeris, Themistoklis S. Kyrgos
, Christos J. Schinas
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(3).2018.29
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #3 pp. 351-369 Views: 2004 Downloads: 619 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯModern trading systems are mechanic, run automatically on computers inside trading platforms and decide their position against the market through optimized parameters and algorithmic strategies. These systems now, in most cases, comprise high frequency traders, especially in the Forex market.
In this research, a piece of software of an automatic high frequency trading system was developed, based on the technical indicator PIVOT (price level breakthrough). The system made transactions on hourly closing prices with weekly parameters optimization period, using the d-Backtest PS method.
Through the search and checking of the results, two findings for optimization of trading strategy were found. These findings with the order they were examined and are presented in this paper are as follows: (1) the simultaneous use of “long and short” positions, with different parameters in a hedging account, acts as a hedging strategy, minimizing losses, in relation to a “long or short” in a non-hedging account for the same time period and (2) there is weak correlation of past backtesting periods between the same systems, if they are configured for “long and short” trades, or for just “long” or for just “short”. -
Good coups, bad coups: evidence from Thailand’s financial markets
Sutsarun Lumjiak , Nguyen Thi Thieu Quang , Christopher Gan, Sirimon Treepongkaruna
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(2).2018.07
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 68-86 Views: 1633 Downloads: 641 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study investigates the short-run and long-run impact of coups on Thailand’s financial markets. Using daily data from the stock and foreign exchange markets during the period 2005–2017, the study shows (1) both coups in 2006 and in 2014 exert short-run impact on Thailand’s stock and foreign exchange markets; (2) however, the direction and magnitude of impact are different and opposite in the two coups; and (3) in the long run, the coups exhibit minimal impact on the currency market, but induce better market performance (positive return and decrease in the return volatility) despite an increase in liquidity risk of the stock market. Against common beliefs about negative consequences of the coup d’états, this study suggests that the uncertainty surrounding coups can bring good investment opportunities for investors to earn abnormal profits. Moreover, in the long term, the coup can drive the country to better stability and development.
-
Analysis of the impact of central bank digital currency on stock markets: Dynamics and implications
Serhiy Frolov, Maksym Ivasenko
, Mariia Dykha
, Mykhaylo Heyenko
, Viktoriia Datsenko
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.18(4).2023.14
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 18, 2023 Issue #4 pp. 149-168 Views: 1516 Downloads: 591 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe purpose of the study is to explore the influence of central bank digital currency on stock markets. To realize the purpose, the TVP-VAR model was built, which determines the impact of volatility of the CBDC attention index (CBDCAI) on the volatility of stock market indices. The study uses a time-varying vector autoregressive model that analyzes weekly data from the first week of January 2015 to the first week of July 2023. The endogenous vector to be assessed by VAR contains CBDCAI and stock market indices of different countries (France: CAC 40, The United States of America: S&P 500, Germany: DAX 40, United Kingdom: FTSE 100, China: SSEC, The Netherlands AEX 25, Switzerland: SMI 20, Japan: Nikkei 225, India: NIFTY 50, Brazil: BVSP, South Korea: KOSPI). The results of the TVP-VAR model show that compared to stock market indices, CBDCAI appeared to be relatively independent and isolated. Interdependence and mutual influence between the digital currency market of central banks and stock markets were also revealed. In addition, CBDC functions primarily as a volatility absorber rather than a source of volatility. Despite the overall ability of the CBDC market to absorb fluctuations in volatility, it may also change its function with the widespread adoption of central bank digital currencies in many countries.