Integrating financial literacy, regulatory technology, and decentralized finance: A new paradigm in Fintech evolution
-
Received February 1, 2024;Accepted April 22, 2024;Published May 10, 2024
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0974-3460
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(2).2024.17
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2024, Issue #2, pp. 213-226
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by2 articlesJournal title: Problems and Perspectives in ManagementArticle title: Governmental management of social housing as an element of state social policy: Bibliometric analysisDOI: 10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.39Volume: 22 / Issue: 2 / First page: 502 / Year: 2024Contributors: Fidan Mammadova, Nargiz Fatahova, Shaban Mammadov, Ruslan Gasimov, Shukur AliyevJournal title: International Journal of Innovation ScienceArticle title: Expanding the effects of monetary policy and prudential regulation on banking sector performance through digitizing regulation: a global PVAR analysisDOI: 10.1108/IJIS-12-2024-0382Volume: / Issue: / First page: / Year: 2025Contributors: Jamileh Mohammad Walid Izzat Ali Mustafa
- 682 Views
-
247 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study investigates the implications of the interaction of financial literacy, regulatory technology, and decentralized finance applications for financial sector development. A two-step analytical regression approach on EViews 10 was used, which performs a one-factor analysis for each variable to identify the individual impact of each factor. A linear FMOLS approach was used to evaluate the cooperative effect of integration. The methodology was implemented on a dataset comprising 2,880 observations from 23 financial institutions in Jordan.
The findings support the hypothesized dynamic interrelations between the essential Fintech factors relevant to the sustainable development of the financial sector, including significant and insignificant factors with the impact of inflation, which provides an adequate understanding of Fintech’s evolution. Additionally, the outcomes consider post-2017 regulatory changes that reflect the role of supervision and regulation for the financial sector’s flexibility and efficiency. Therefore, the results reveal the essential contribution of integrating decentralized finance applications, financial literacy, and regulatory technology to the development of Jordan’s financial sector. Financial literacy serves as a facilitator, regulatory technology is a compliance enabler, and decentralized finance applications are driving forces of innovation and financial inclusion, ensuring a robust and sustainable financial ecosystem. It is shown that the interaction of factors forces the sector’s development, reflecting the world’s trend in digital inclusion and viable financial development.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G20, G28, O33
-
References67
-
Tables6
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Visual representation of study hypotheses
- Figure 2. Financial sector composition in Jordan (2022)
- Figure 3. Research variables trend
-
- Table 1. Research metrics
- Table 2. Financial development measures
- Table 3. Summary statistics
- Table 4. CBJ regulatory instructions (2011–2022)
- Table 5. One-factor regression analysis results
- Table 6. FMOLS cointegration regression analysis
-
- Abdollah, K. A. B. (2022). The Impact of Financial Literacy on the Adoption of Fintech and Defi Applications (Doctoral dissertation, Master Thesis). Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Tun Abdul Razak.
- Alam, T. (2019). Blockchain and its Role in the Internet of Things (IoT).
- Allahham, M., & Ahmad, A. (2024). AI-induced anxiety in the assessment of factors influencing the adoption of mobile payment services in supply chain firms: A mental accounting perspective. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 505-514.
- Al-Qaruty, T. M. R., Areiqat, A. Y., & Jaradat, N. M. (2023). Synergy between FinTech, RegTech, and Artificial Intelligence in Transforming the Financial Ecosystem. Onomázein, 61(September), 757-763.
- Alshubiri, F. (2021). The stock market capitalization and financial growth nexus: an empirical study of western European countries. Future Business Journal, 7, 46.
- Alt, R., & Puschmann, T. (2012). The rise of customer-oriented banking-electronic markets is paving the way for change in the financial industry. Electronic Markets, 22, 203-215.
- Amponsah, A. A., Adebayo, F. A., & WEYORI, B. A. (2021). Blockchain in insurance: Exploratory analysis of prospects and threats. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(1).
- Anagnostopoulos, I. (2018). Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 7-25.
- Anagnostopoulos, I. (2018). Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 7-25.
- Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckey, R. P. (2016). FinTech, RegTech, and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 37, 371.
- Asgari, B., & Izawa, H. (2023). Does FinTech penetration drive financial development? Evidence from panel analysis of emerging and developing economies. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(5).
- Becha, H., Kalai, M., & Helali, K. (2023). Smooth transition regression model relating inflation to economic growth in Tunisia.
- Becker, M., Merz, K., & Buchkremer, R. (2020). RegTech – the application of modern information technology in regulatory affairs: areas of interest in research and practice. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance, and Management, 27(4), 161-167.
- Blockchain.com. (n.d.). Blockchain Charts.
- Bose, S., Dong, G., Simpson, A., Bose, S., Dong, G., & Simpson, A. (2019). The role of finance in achieving sustainability. The Financial Ecosystem: The Role of Finance in Achieving Sustainability, 1-18.
- Cai, C., Marrone, M., & Linnenluecke, M. (2022). Trends in Fintech research and practice: Examining the intersection with the information systems field. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 50(1), 40.
- Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., & Patsakis , C. (2019). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification, and open issues. Telematics and Informatics, 36, 55-81.
- Central Bank of Jordan. (2012–2022). Financial stability report.
- Central Bank of Jordan. (2016–2022). Annual report on the national payment system.
- Chao, X., Ran, Q., Chen, J., Li, T., Qian, Q., & Ergu, D. (2022). Regulatory technology (Reg-Tech) in financial stability supervision: Taxonomy, key methods, applications, and future directions. International Review of Financial Analysis, 80, 102023.
- Chiu, I. H. (2016). Fintech and disruptive business models in financial products, intermediation and markets-policy implications for financial regulators. Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 21, 55.
- Dai H. N., Z. Zheng, Y. Zhang, (2019). Blockchain for the Internet of Things: A Survey. IEEE Internet Things Journal.
- Daoud, M. K., Taha, S., Al-Qeed, M., Alsafadi, Y., Bani Ahmad, A. Y., & Allahham, M. (2024). EcoConnect: Guiding environmental awareness via digital marketing approaches.
- Dara, S. R., & Mariah, M. (2020). Peran Fintech Dalam Upaya Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Keuangan Pada Masyarakat di Jakarta. AKURASI: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 2(3), 127-138.
- Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., & Jurdak, R. (2016). Blockchain in the internet of things: challenges and solutions.
- Dudka, L. (2022). Assessing and Improving the Financial Literacy of the Population. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 214-220.
- Gohil , D., & Thakker, S. V. (2021). Blockchain-integrated technologies for solving supply chain challenges. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 3(2), 78-97.
- Haddad, H., Al-Bawab, A. A., & Marei, A. (2023). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the auditing profession. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(5), e01689.
- Haddad, H., Al-Qudah, L. U. M. A., Almansour, B. Y., & Rumman, N. A. (2022). Bank Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Commercial Bank Profitability: in Jordan from 2009-2019. ELIT–Economic Laboratory for Transition Research Dz. Washingtona 4/5, 18(4), 155-166.
- Hasan, M., Noor, T., Gao, J. (2022). Rural Consumers’ Financial Literacy and Access to FinTech Services. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
- Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Suman, R., & Khan, S. (2022). A review of Blockchain Technology applications for financial services. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 100073.
- Jopaac. (2019-2022). Annual report.
- Katona, T. (2021). Decentralized finance: The possibilities of a blockchain “money lego” system. Financial and Economic Review, 20(1), 74-102.
- Koroleva, E. (2022). FinTech Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Exploring the Interplay between Input and Output. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(4), 92.
- Kumar, A., & Garcia, M. (2024). Blockchain in Cross-Border Transactions: An Empirical Analysis. International Journal of Blockchain Economics, 7(1), 65-83.
- Lavrinenko, O., Čižo, E., Ignatjeva, S., Danileviča, A., & Krukowski, K. (2023). Financial Technology (FinTech) as a Financial Development Factor in the EU Countries. Economies, 11(2), 45.
- Li, B., Guo, P., & Zeng, Y. (2019). The Impact of Haze on the Availability of Company Debt Financing: Evidence for Sustainability of Chinese Listed Companies. Sustainability, 11, 806.
- Lusardi, A., & Mitchelli, O. S. (2007). Financial literacy and retirement preparedness: Evidence and implications for financial education: The problems are serious, and remedies are not simple. Business Economics, 42, 35-44.
- MadfooatCom. (2023). Who’s who in Jordan banking, insurance, and financial services?
- Makarov, I., & Antoinette, S. (2022). Cryptocurrencies and Decentralized Finance. No. 1061. Bank for International Settlements.
- Marei, A., Mustafa, J. A., Othman, M., Daoud, L., & Lutfi, A. (2023). The moderation of organizational readiness on the relationship between toe factors and fintech adoption and financial performance. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(3), e730-e730.
- Maurer, B. (2016). Re-risking in Realtime. On possible futures for finance after the blockchain. Behemoth-A Journal on Civilization, 9(2), 82-96.
- Mustafa, J. A., Marie, A., Al-Amarneh, A., & Al-Abbadi, A. (2023). The Role of Fintech Payment Instruments in Improving Financial Inclusion.
- Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: a comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press.
- Natarajan, H., Krause, S., & Gradstein, H. (2017). Distributed ledger technology and blockchain.
- OECD. (2006). The importance of financial education. The policy brief.
- OECD. (2022). Why Decentralised Finance (DeFi) Matters and the Policy Implications.
- OXEPR. (2019). Building FinTech Ecosystems: Emerging Trends & Policy Implications Insights from the 5th Annual Oxford Entrepreneurship Policy Roundtable (OXEPR). University of Oxford.
- Pazaitis A., De Filippi P., Kostakis V. (2017). Blockchain and value systems in the sharing economy: the illustrative case of Backfeed. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 105-115.
- Prabhakaran, S., & Mynavathi, L. (2023). Perception vs. reality: Analysing the nexus between financial literacy and fintech adoption. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(4), 13-25.
- Price, D. (2018). 5 Big Blockchain Issues: Security, Privacy, Legal, Regulatory, and Ethical.
- Sahi, S. K. (2009). Financial literacy education for the Indian consumer: the road to economic development. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 2(5), 493-518.
- Se, J. (2023). The Influence of Financial Literacy on Financial Inclusion in Indonesia with Fintech as a Mediator. Inovbiz: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis, 11(1), 103-109.
- Shamli Prabhakaran, & Mynavathi, L. (2023). Perception vs. reality: Analysing the nexus between financial literacy and fintech adoption. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(4), 13-25.
- The Regulatory Horizons Council (RHC). (2021). The Future of Technological Innovations and the Role of Regulation.
- The World Bank. (n.d.). Open Data. (2011–2023).
- Treleaven, P, Gendal Brown, R, & Yang. D, (2017). Blockchain Technology in Finance. Computer, 50(9), 14-17.
- TU-T Focus Group Digital Financial Services. (2016). The Digital Financial Services Ecosystem. Telecommunication standardization sector of ITU (Technical Report).
- Van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. (2011). Financial literacy and stock market participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 449-472.
- Vidovićová, L. (2021). Financial Literacy. In D. Gu & M. E. Dupre (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. Cham: Springer.
- Widyastuti, M., & Hermanto, Y. B. (2022). The effect of financial literacy and social media on micro capital through financial technology in the creative industry sector in East Java. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1).
- Wiradinata, T., Herdinata, C., Christian, S., & Setiobudi, A. (2022). Accelerating electronic wallet payment service adoption in Indonesian small and medium-sized businesses. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 13(1), 3-18.
- World Bank. (n.d.). Global Financial Development Report 2019 / 2020: Bank Regulation and Supervision Ten Years after the Global Financial Crisis.
- Yakoboski, P., Lusardi, A., & Hasler, A. (2023). Financial literacy, longevity literacy, and retirement readiness (TIAA Institute Research Paper Series No. Forthcoming).
- Yoshino, N., Morgan, P. J., & Long, T. Q. (2020). Financial literacy and fintech adoption in Japan. ADBI Working Paper Series, 1095.
- Yue, P., Korkmaz, A. G., Yin, Z., & Zhou, H. (2022). The rise of digital finance: Financial inclusion or debt trap? Finance Research Letters, 47, 102604.
- Zhu, H., & Zhou, Z. Z. (2016). Analysis and outlook of applications of blockchain technology to equity crowdfunding in China. Financial Innovation, 2, 1-11.
-
-
Conceptualization
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Data curation
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Formal Analysis
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Funding acquisition
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Investigation
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Methodology
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Project administration
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Resources
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Software
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Supervision
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Validation
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Visualization
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Writing – original draft
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Writing – review & editing
Jamileh Ali Mustafa
-
Conceptualization
-
Assessment of cryptocurrencies as an asset class by their characteristics
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #3 pp. 169-181 Views: 2073 Downloads: 647 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe cryptocurrency market has witnessed significant growth in the past few months. The emergence of hundreds of new digital currencies and the huge increase in the prices of their leading representatives have attracted a lot of attention from investors. However, the financial characteristics of the cryptocurrency markets have not been systematically evaluated yet. As a consequence, there is currently no consensus on whether cryptocurrencies constitute an individual asset class or if they share substantial similarities to stocks, bonds, commodities or foreign exchange. Based on Markowitz et al. (2017) this paper aims to fill this lack of research by evaluating the cryptocurrency market based on seven requirements of an individual asset class. The authors find that the cryptocurrency market distinguishes itself remarkably from established asset classes in terms of risk and return. Additionally, the low correlation between the cryptocurrency markets and these established asset classes induces a diversification potential for investors, leading to more favorable risk/return profiles of their portfolios. But also the emergence of investment services and products provided by the financial industry and the increasingly cost-effective access to cryptocurrencies corroborate the conclusion that cryptocurrencies can be seen as an individual asset class.
-
Trade credit and bank credit as alternative governance structures in South Africa: evidence from banking sector development
Shame Mugova doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.12(3-1).2017.05Banks and Bank Systems Volume 12, 2017 Issue #3 pp. 204-214 Views: 1269 Downloads: 275 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯFinancial sector development is an influential force that outlines the financing and governance of firms in emerging economies. Suppliers and bankers represent alternative governance structures to a firm because of their trade credit and loan requirements, respectively. The continuous monitoring of investment by banks and suppliers impacts on corporate disclosure and practices. The study compares a sample of Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) firms listed on the Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) index which measures corporate governance and those not listed on the index. A Generalized Least Squares (GLS) random effect regression of banking sector development and trade credit of firms listed on the JSE SRI and non-SRI listed firms was done to ascertain whether trade credit gives firms a preferred governance system and structure. The findings affirm that good corporate governance practices improve access to bank loans for working capital financing and good governance practices do not consequently result in more bank loan as a preferred governance structure for working capital financing compared to use of trade credit.
-
Interaction between decentralized financial services and the traditional banking system: A comparative analysis
Serhiy Frolov, Maksym Ivasenko
, Mariia Dykha
, Iryna Shalyhina
, Vladyslav Hrabar
, Veronika Fenyves
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(2).2024.05
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024 Issue #2 pp. 53-74 Views: 900 Downloads: 238 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis paper investigates the interaction between decentralized financial services and the traditional banking system by building VAR models, conducting Granger causality tests, building impulse response functions, and performing variance analysis. To implement the model, banking indicators of the USA, India, and Great Britain were selected: the volume of commercial and industrial loans, interest rate, consumer price index, total liabilities and capital of banks, aggregate deposits, federal funds rate (for the USA), and repo rate (for India). The study examined central bank data of the specified countries from July 2018 to January 2024 with the TVL indicator, which measures the sum of all assets locked in DeFi protocols. The results of the impulse response function (IRF) for countries demonstrate different interactions between TVL and bank indicators. The US response to TVL shocks demonstrates a stimulative monetary policy, with significant Fed rate reductions and increased commercial lending to boost economic activity. In contrast, India’s monetary stimulus, marked by declining repo rates and growth in banking sector liabilities and deposits, aims to enhance economic resilience. The UK, however, adopts a conservative monetary approach, with sharp bank rate increases and mixed lending and deposit responses, prioritizing financial stability. Analysis across these nations highlights different impacts of financial indicators on TVL. In the US, the evolving relationship between TVL and bank indicators reflects the financial system’s complexity. India’s sensitivity to monetary policy, credit conditions, and inflation significantly influences TVL. In the UK, central bank decisions, particularly the bank rate, play a crucial role in financial market dynamics.
Acknowledgment
The authors appreciate the assistance in the preparation of the article provided by the University of Debrecen Program for Scientific Publication and the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.