From boardroom to CSR excellence: The role of leadership and governance in corporate sustainability of European firms
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(2).2025.23
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2025, Issue #2, pp. 293-311
- 14 Views
-
4 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study investigates how board-level corporate governance affects corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance in European firms. A panel dataset of 5,760 firm-year observations from the STOXX Europe 600 index, covering 21 countries between 2010 and 2022, was analyzed using multivariate regression models. The data, sourced from Refinitiv Eikon, include firms across 22 industries, with capital goods and materials among the largest sectors, and represent major economies such as the United Kingdom, Germany, and France.
The analysis focused on board composition, CEO characteristics, and the presence of governance, audit, and CSR committees. It was found that independent and diverse boards with high attendance are associated with stronger CSR performance. Companies with active CSR committees demonstrate particularly enhanced ESG outcomes. Interestingly, CEO duality is linked to weaker CSR performance, while the presence of a former CEO as chairman improves sustainability efforts.
The study provides quantitative evidence on how governance structures shape corporate sustainability and offers practical insights for corporate leaders, policymakers, and investors seeking to improve CSR strategies across diverse European contexts.
Acknowledgment
This paper is co-funded by the European Union through the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) within the project “Embracing EU corporate social responsibility: challenges and opportunities of business-society bonds transformation in Ukraine” – 101094100 – EECORE – ERASMUS-JMO-2022-HEI-TCH-RSCH-UA-IBA / ERASMUS-JMO-2022-HEI-TCHRSCH https://eecore.snau.edu.ua/
Oleh PASKO expresses sincere gratitude for the support from the Kirkland Research Program, generously provided by the Leaders of Change Foundation established by the Polish-American Freedom Foundation.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G34, M14, M41
-
References63
-
Tables7
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Distribution of ESG Score
-
- Table 1. Sample selection procedure
- Table 2. Number and proportion of observations by industry
- Table 3. Country of incorporation of analyzed companies
- Table 4. Descriptive statistics
- Table 5. Correlation matrix
- Table 6. Regression results
- Table A1. Complete list of research variables
-
- Abu Qa’dan, M. B., & Suwaidan, M. S. (2019). Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: the case of Jordan. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 28-46.
- Adams, R. B. (2016). Women on boards: The superheroes of tomorrow? The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 371-386.
- Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
- Adhikari, B. K., Agrawal, A., & Malm, J. (2019). Do women managers keep firms out of trouble? Evidence from corporate litigation and policies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(1), 202-225.
- Ahmad, N. (2017). Board Independence and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reporting in Malaysia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(2).
- Al Maeeni, F., Ellili, N. O. D., & Nobanee, H. (2022). Impact of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure of the UAE listed banks. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.
- Ali Gull, A., Hussain, N., Akbar Khan, S., Nadeem, M., & Mansour Zalata, A. (2023). Walking the Talk? A Corporate Governance Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling. British Journal of Management, 34(4), 2186-2211.
- Almulhim, A. A., & Aljughaiman, A. A. (2023). Corporate Sustainability and Financial Performance: The Moderating Effect of CEO Characteristics. Sustainability, 15(16), 12664.
- Arena, C., Petrides, Y., & Vourvachis, P. (2020). Determinants of CSR disclosure in Mexico. International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, 11(3), 303.
- Bagh, T., Khan, M. A., Meyer, N., & Riaz, H. (2023). Impact of boardroom diversity on corporate financial performance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 222.
- Bansal, S., Lopez-Perez, M., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2018). Board Independence and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Mediating Role of the Presence of Family Ownership. Administrative Sciences, 8(3), 33.
- Bataineh, H., Alkurdi, A., Abuhommous, A. A., & Abdel Latif, M. (2023). The role of ownership structure, board, and audit committee in corporate social responsibility disclosure: Jordanian evidence. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.
- Bel-Oms, I., & Segarra-Moliner, J. R. (2022). How Do Remuneration Committees Affect Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure? Empirical Evidence from an International Perspective. Sustainability, 14(2), 860.
- Bhaskar, R., Bansal, S., Abbassi, W., & Pandey, D. K. (2023). CEO compensation and CSR: Economic implications and policy recommendations. Economic Analysis and Policy, 79, 232-256.
- Bhaskar, R., Li, P., Bansal, S., & Kumar, S. (2023). A new insight on CEO characteristics and corporate social responsibility (CSR): A meta-analytical review. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, 102815.
- Bose, S., Ali, M. J., Hossain, S., & Shamsuddin, A. (2022). Does CEO–Audit Committee/Board Interlocking Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 179(3), 819-847.
- Bradbury, M., Jia, J., & Li, Z. (2022). Corporate social responsibility committees and the use of corporate social responsibility assurance services. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 18(2), 100317.
- Brick, I. E., & Qiao, Y. (2024). Attunement theory, CEO’s cyclical influence on corporate social responsibility and firm value. Managerial Finance, 50(1), 75-91.
- Chen, W. (Tina), Zhou, G. (Stephen), & Zhu, X. (Kevin). (2019). CEO tenure and corporate social responsibility performance. Journal of Business Research, 95, 292-302.
- Cosma, S., Principale, S., & Venturelli, A. (2022). Sustainable governance and climate-change disclosure in European banking: the role of the corporate social responsibility committee. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(6), 1345-1369.
- de Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & van Staden, C. J. (2011). The Effect of Board Characteristics on Firm Environmental Performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636-1663.
- Dimitropoulos, P. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Sustainability, and Executive Compensation in the EU. In Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance (pp. 103-126). Routledge.
- Dissanayake, S., Ajward, R., & Dissanayake, D. (2023). Whether corporate social responsibility is used to suppress earnings management practices and could corporate governance mechanisms prevent them? An empirical study. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 8(4), 373-386.
- Dunn, P., & Sainty, B. (2009). The relationship among board of director characteristics, corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(4), 407-423.
- Ebaid, I. E.-S. (2022). Corporate governance mechanisms and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Global Responsibility, 13(4), 396-420.
- Egginton, J. F., & McBrayer, G. A. (2019). Does it pay to be forthcoming? Evidence from CSR disclosure and equity market liquidity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 396-407.
- Farooq, M., Noor, A., & Maqbool, N. (2023). How does corporate social responsibility affect financial distress? The moderating role of corporate governance. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(8), 1555-1573.
- García Martín, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2020). Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 74-94.
- Godfrey, C., Hoepner, A. G. F., Lin, M.-T., & Poon, S.-H. (2024). Women on boards and corporate social irresponsibility: evidence from a Granger style reverse causality minimisation procedure. The European Journal of Finance, 30(1), 1-27.
- Gull, A. A., Hussain, N., Khan, S. A., Khan, Z., & Saeed, A. (2023). Governing Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling: The Effect of the Governance Committee on Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(2), 349-374.
- Haque, F. (2017). The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. The British Accounting Review, 49(3), 347-364.
- Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 641-660.
- Hsu, H.-W. (2023). CEO excess compensation: the impact of compensation committee quality and corporate social responsibility. Applied Economics Letters, 30(16), 2141-2148.
- Hussain, N., Khan, S. A., Nguyen, D. K., Stocchetti, A., & Corbet, S. (2023). Board-level governance and corporate social responsibility: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Economic Surveys.
- Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235-256.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- Khan, A., Afeef, M., Ilyas, M., & Jan, S. (2024). Does CSR committee drive the association between corporate social responsibility and firm performance? International evidence. Managerial Finance, 50(1), 50-74.
- Kumar, R. (2020). The Five Strategic Building Blocks of Mandated Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) (pp. 25-43).
- Liu, Y., & Hooy, C.-W. (2023). Components of CEO Power and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Role of Board Independence. Global Economic Review, 52(2), 114-133.
- Mohy-ud-Din, K. (2023). Role of Board Composition Index in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure: Evidence from United States. Global Business Review.
- Naseem, M. A., Ali, R., & Ur Rehman, R. (2023). Is there a mediating role of corporate social responsibility between board independence, board diversity, and dividend payouts decision? Gender in Management.
- Orazalin, N. (2020). Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 140-153.
- Pasko, O., Lagodiienko, N., Kudlaieva, N., Riabenko, L., & Gerasymenko, N. (2022). Does corporate governance moderate the effect of corporate social responsibility on a firm’s financial performance? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(4), 588-601.
- Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Oriekhova, A., Gerasymenko, N., & Polishchuk, O. (2023). Solving the choice puzzle: Financial and non-financial stakeholders preferences in corporate disclosures. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(4), 434-451.
- Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Tuzhyk, K., Proskurina, N., & Gryn, V. (2021). Do sustainability reporting conduct and corporate governance attributes relate? Empirical evidence from China. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 110-123.
- Pinheiro, A. B., dos Santos, J. I. A. S., da Silva, D. M. L., Segatto, A. P., & Korelo, J. C. (2023). Corporate governance meets corporate social responsibility: evidence from Latin America. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 36(4), 516-534.
- Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., Bel-Oms, I., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2023). Corporate social responsibility commitment of women directors through audit committees: evidence from international firms. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 36(1), 98-118.
- Qiao, Y. (2023). CEO turnover, stakeholder management, and dynamics between corporate social responsibility and firm performance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration.
- Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Diversity, Gender, Strategy and Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327-347.
- Rashid, A. (2021). Board independence and corporate social responsibility reporting: mediating role of stakeholder power. Management Research Review, 44(8), 1217-1240.
- Rivas, J. L., & Rubio, J. (2023). Boards and CSR: an emerging market perspective. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 36(2), 141-155.
- Sarhan, A. A., & Al-Najjar, B. (2023). The influence of corporate governance and shareholding structure on corporate social responsibility: The key role of executive compensation. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(4), 4532-4556.
- Song, B. (2022). The Influence of Audit-Committee Characteristics on the Association between Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Quality. Sustainability, 14(17), 10496.
- Sundarasen, S. D. D., Je-Yen, T., & Rajangam, N. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(1), 35-53.
- Thuy, H. X., Khuong, N. V., Anh, L. H. T., & Quyen, P. N. (2022). Effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility in Vietnam: state-ownership as the moderating role. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.
- Tibiletti, V., Marchini, P. L., Furlotti, K., & Medioli, A. (2020). Does corporate governance matter in corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, csr.2097.
- Velte, P. (2017). Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(2), 19-35.
- Velte, P. (2019). Do CEO incentives and characteristics influence corporate social responsibility (CSR) and vice versa? A literature review. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(8), 1293-1323.
- Velte, P. (2023). Does sustainable board governance drive corporate social responsibility? A structured literature review on European archival research. Journal of Global Responsibility, 14(1), 46-88.
- Velte, P., & Stawinoga, M. (2020). Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings. Journal of Management Control, 31(4), 333-377.
- Zhao, X. (Rachel), Zhou, G. (Stephen), & Rezaee, Z. (2023). Tournament Incentives and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 38(4), 934-963.
- Zhuang, Y., Chang, X., & Lee, Y. (2018). Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance: Evidence from Chinese Public Firms. Sustainability, 10(8), 2752.
- Zubeltzu-Jaka, E., Álvarez-Etxeberria, I., & Aldaz-Odriozola, M. (2024). Corporate social responsibility oriented boards and triple bottom line performance: A meta-analytic study. Business Strategy & Development, 7(1).