Inter-organizational imitation: Definition and typology
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(1).2017.03
-
Article InfoVolume 1 2017, Issue #1, pp. 23-31
- 1433 Views
-
306 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The sustained idea of this article is that the concept of imitation has not been sufficiently developed in the field of strategic management and has often been confused with the notion of mimicry. Therefore, the objective of this research is to emphasize the distinction between different types of imitation unlike a lot of research on companies imitative behavior focused on one type as the perfect imitation. This will clarify ambiguities in the literature on imitation, and show that the mobilization of neo institutional theory is not sufficient to explain all the imitative behavior of organizations in a market.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L20, L21, L22
-
References20
-
Tables3
-
Figures1
-
- Fig. 1. Imitation matrix
-
- Table 1. The imitation and organizational life
- Table 2. Meta analysis of imitation and innovation
- Table 3. The characteristics and the concepts associating to other types of imitation
-
- Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), pp. 254-285.
- Augarten, S. (1984). Bit by Bit: an illustrated history of computers; New York: Ticknor & Fields.
- Baize, D. (1999). De la contrefaçon à l'imitation. Revue française de Gestion, 119 (25), pp. 76-81.
- Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), pp. 797-817.
- Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99-120.
- Baudonnière, P. M. (1997). Le mimétisme et l’imitation; Paris: Dominos Flammarion.
- Bensebaa, F. (2000). Actions stratégiques et réactions des enterprises. Management, 3(2), pp. 57-79.
- Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), pp. 992-1026.
- Bolton, M. K., (1993). Imitation versus Innovation: lessons to be learned from the Japanese. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), pp. 30-45.
- Brandes, P., Hadani, M., & Goranova, M. (2006). Stock options expensing: An examination of agency and institutional theory explanations. Journal of Business Research, 59(5), pp. 595-603.
- Broadbent, J., Jacobs, K., & Laughlin, R. (2001). Organizational resistance strategies to unwanted accounting and finance changes. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(5), pp. 565-586.
- Cadix, A. & Pointet, J. M. (2002). Le management à l'épreuve des changements technologiques. Impacts sur la société et les organisations; Paris: Organisation.
- Carpenter, G. S., & Nakamoto, K. (1989). Consumer preference formation and pioneer advantage. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), pp. 285-298.
- Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), pp. 555-590.
- Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), pp. 147-166.
- Delios A., & Henisz, W. (2001). Uncertainty, imitation and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations 1990-1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), pp. 443-475.
- Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), pp. 147-160.
- Dolphin, R. (1987). Photography’s March of Time, Maclean’s, April 24, pp. 51-52.
- Garcia-Pont, C., & Nohria, N. (2002). Local versus global mimetism: the dynamics of alliance formation in the automobile industry. Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), pp. 307-321.
- Greenberg, C. (1992). Future Worth: Before It’s Hot, Grab It. New York Times, April 16, p. 19.