The complexity burden in transfer pricing compliance: A computational assessment of Ukrainian tax law and its implications for accounting

  • 15 Views
  • 2 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Ukrainian transfer pricing legislation demonstrates a significantly higher level of regulatory complexity than international OECD standards, creating a disproportionate burden on the accounting and reporting system. The study aims to quantify the regulatory burden generated by the complexity of Ukrainian transfer pricing legislation through a computational linguistic analysis of its algorithmic characteristics in comparison with international OECD standards. The research methodology is based on Halstead metrics to calculate the algorithmic complexity of regulatory texts, considered as formal structures with the distribution of lexical units into operators and operands. The computational assessment reveals that Ukrainian transfer pricing regulations demonstrate algorithmic complexity 10 to 37 times higher than OECD standards, as the complexity index (L) for Article 39 of the Tax Code of Ukraine equals 2.742 percent versus 0.148 percent for OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, while Law of Ukraine No. 4536-IX (Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2023) reaches 5.455 percent, exceeding international benchmarks by 37 times. This excessive complexity directly affects accounting practices, requiring additional resources for recordkeeping, increasing internal control requirements, and increasing the risk of financial reporting errors. The empirical findings demonstrate that excessive algorithmic density directly increases compliance costs for accounting departments, requiring additional resources for interpretation, documentation, and internal control. The study provides quantitative evidence supporting the necessity of systematic simplification of national transfer pricing regulations.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Results of the analysis of the normative complexity level
    • Table 2. Descriptive statistics of the complexity level indicator
    • Conceptualization
      Serhii Lehenchuk, Dmytro Zakharov
    • Investigation
      Serhii Lehenchuk, Viktoriia Gryn, Viktoriia Makarovych, Gabriella Loskorikh
    • Methodology
      Serhii Lehenchuk, Dmytro Zakharov, Viktoriia Makarovych
    • Project administration
      Serhii Lehenchuk
    • Supervision
      Serhii Lehenchuk, Dmytro Zakharov
    • Writing – original draft
      Serhii Lehenchuk, Dmytro Zakharov
    • Writing – review & editing
      Serhii Lehenchuk, Dmytro Zakharov, Viktoriia Gryn, Viktoriia Makarovych
    • Data curation
      Dmytro Zakharov, Viktoriia Makarovych, Gabriella Loskorikh
    • Resources
      Dmytro Zakharov, Viktoriia Gryn, Gabriella Loskorikh
    • Formal Analysis
      Viktoriia Gryn, Gabriella Loskorikh
    • Funding acquisition
      Viktoriia Gryn, Viktoriia Makarovych
    • Validation
      Viktoriia Gryn, Viktoriia Makarovych
    • Visualization
      Viktoriia Makarovych, Gabriella Loskorikh
    • Software
      Gabriella Loskorikh