Developing data management tools to identify the colonial impact on monuments in the Sumy region of Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.09(1).2025.12
-
Article InfoVolume 9 2025, Issue #1, pp. 160-173
- 46 Views
-
17 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Ukraine experienced expansionism by multiple foreign groups and states throughout its history. However, Russian colonization of the 18th and 19th centuries and Soviet colonization of 1921–1991 had the most significant impact on Ukrainian national state formation and cultural identification through organized Russian supremacy, systemic totalitarian ideology, and methodical Ukrainian language suppression in public spaces. This paper focuses on developing data management tools to identify the representation of Russian colonial impact in Ukrainian public art through analysis of Ukrainian monuments included in the State Monuments’ Rosters for the Sumy region, a territory bordering Russia. The study utilizes digital data collection apparatus and data analysis to evaluate the distribution of monuments as the primary descriptive research technique. A Monument Digital Identification Card was created to indicate that the Russian colonial impact in the Sumy region, represented in monuments through identified criteria such as epoch, political narratives, personalities, and texts’ language, is higher than Ukrainian statehood narratives. The developed data management tools compare the degree of colonial impact in public art objects installed and included in the State Monuments’ Rosters before 1991 and after Ukraine gained independence. An increase in totalitarian propaganda in 1921–1991 directly impacted the number and narratives of monuments, with 94.9% reflecting colonial narratives and only 5.1% representing national identity. At the same time, no increase in Ukrainian national narratives has been identified since Ukrainian independence in 1991. The research findings confirm the need for state regulatory reforms and regional authorities’ amendments to achieve historical justice.
Acknowledgment
This research is financially supported by the Ukrainian Scientific Research Foundation within the framework of the project “Digital archiving of monuments as objects of public memorialization for the preservation of the cultural heritage of Ukraine.”
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O18, Z13, Z38
-
References41
-
Tables7
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Data accumulation model
-
- Table 1. Monument digital identification card
- Table 2. Quantitative representation by periods of monument installation correlated to the political narrative
- Table 3. Culture of war, including victims
- Table 4. Monumentalized personalities and groups representing colonial narratives
- Table 5. Monumentalized personalities and groups representing Ukrainian national narratives
- Table 6. Technical objects representing narratives of Russian colonialism
- Table 7. Percentage of political narratives out of the total 839 monuments
-
- Abu-AlSondos, I. (2023). An empirical study of critical success factors in implementing knowledge management systems (KMS): The moderating role of culture. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(4),1527-1538.
- Alzghoul, A., & Aboalganam, K. M. (2025). Investigating the effect of knowledge management systems on university performance: The interplay of intellectual and human capital. Knowledge and Performance Management, 9(1), 93-107.
- Amat, J., Filippucci, P., & Savoret, E. (2015). The Cemetery of France: Reconstruction and Memorialization on the Battlefield of Verdun (France). In Sørensen M. L. S., & Viejo-Rose, D. (Eds.), War and Cultural Heritage: Biographies of Place, New York (pp. 46-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Atabay, Z. E., Macedonio, A., Teba, T., & Ünal, Z. G. (2022). Destruction, heritage and memory: post-conflict memorialisation for recovery and reconciliation. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 14(4), 477-496.
- Billingsley, K. (2018). Intersectionality as Locality: Children and Transitional Justice in Nepal. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 12(1), 64-87.
- Boychuk, Yu., Dumelier, R., Fau, Ye., Sereda, K., Toews, A., & White, C. (2023). The Effect of Russian Colonialism on Ukrainian Cultural Identity. Crossing Borders, 5(2), 1-16.
- Burima, M., Meškova, S., Vasiļjeva, E., & Oļehnoviča, I. (2016). Studies of monuments to famous persons as a component of national identity. Materials of the 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences & Arts SGEM, (pp. 185-194).
- Cheung, M., Smith, N., & Craven, O. (2021). The impacts of public art on cities, places, and people’s lives. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 52(1), 37-50.
- Durand, O. I. (2022). “New Russia” and the Legacies of Settler Colonialism in Southern Ukraine. Journal of Applied History, 4(1/2), 58-75.
- Falko, N., & Zhukov, O. (2023). Transition from hierarchy to adhocratic organizational culture in a Ukrainian university: From survival to successful development in the conditions of war. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(2-si), 15-22.
- Gabowitsch, M. (2023). Monuments in times of war. Eurozine.
- Gray, J., Liu, D. T., Nieto-Santisteban, M., Szalay, A., Dewitt, D. J., & Heber, G. (2005). Scientific data management in the coming decade. SIGMOD Record, 34(4), 34-41.
- Hagen, M. (1995). Does Ukraine have a history? Slavic Review, 54(3), 658-673.
- Hansen, J. H. (2023). Creating the peasant as other: Self-colonisation in the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 51(5), 931-953.
- Hass, K. A. (1998). Carried to the wall: American memory and the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press.
- Hrytsak, Y. (2015). The postcolonial is not enough. Slavic Review, 74(4), 732-737.
- Lee, C. (2023). Memorialization through metaverse: New technologies for heritage education. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-M-2-2023, 919-926.
- Legislation of Ukraine. (2015). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro zasudzhennia komunistychnoho ta natsional-sotsialistychnoho (natsystskoho) totalitarnykh rezhymiv v Ukraini ta zaboronu propahandy yikhnoi symvoliky” [Law of Ukraine “On the Condemnation of Communist and National Socialist (Nazi) Totalitarian Regimes in Ukraine and the Prohibition of Propaganda of Their Symbols”] No. 317-VIII dated April 9, 2015. (In Ukrainian).
- Legislation of Ukraine. (2023). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro zasudzhennia ta zaboronu propahandy rosiiskoi imperskoi polityky v Ukraini i dekolonizatsiiu toponimii” [Law of Ukraine “On the Condemnation and Prohibition of Propaganda of Russian Imperial Policy in Ukraine and the Decolonization of Toponymy”] No. 3005-IX dated March 21, 2023. (In Ukrainian).
- Login, E. (2012). War memorials in Sedan and Metz: The evolution of war memorialization in eastern France. Journal of Conflict Archaeology, 7(3), 177-198.
- Login, E. (2015). Set in Stone?: War Memorialisation as a Long-Term and Continuing Process in the UK, France and the USA. Archaeopress.
- Lundqvist, M. (2019). Post-war memorialisation as everyday peace? Exploring everyday (dis-) engagements with the Maoist martyrs’ gate of Beni Bazaar in Nepal. Conflict, Security & Development, 19(5), 475-496.
- Martin, C., Cadiou, C., & Jannès-Ober, E. (2017). Data Management: New Tools, New Organization, and New Skills in a French Research Institute. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 27(1), 73-88.
- Merlo, T. R. (2017). Knowledge management technology: human-computer interaction & cultural perspective on pattern of retrieval, organization, use, and sharing of information and knowledge. Knowledge and Performance Management, 1(1), 46-54.
- Mick, C. (2023). The Fight for the Past: Contested Heritage and the Russian Invasion of Ukraine. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 14(2), 135-153.
- Nasution, S. M. A., Daulay, R., Purnama, N. I., Alryani, I., & Purba, N. L. (2025). Knowledge sharing and absorptive capacity in improving the innovation performance of MSMEs handicrafts in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(2), 357-370.
- Palko, O. (2016). Becoming Soviet: Lost cultural alternatives in Ukraine, 1917–1933 (Doctoral Thesis). University of East Anglia.
- Pavlenko, V., Alenych, O., Podoljaka, N., Osadchyj, Je., & Korotja, O. (2017). Zvid pamiaatok istorii ta kultury Ukrainy. Sumska oblast [The collection of historical and cultural monuments of Ukraine: Sumy region]. Kyiv: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (In Ukrainian).
- Pavlyshyn, M. (2016). Literary history as provocation of national identity, national identity as provocation of literary history: The case of Ukraine. Thesis Eleven, 136(1), 74-89.
- Petrushenko, Y., Vorontsova, A., Dorczak, R., & Vasylieva, T. (2023). The third mission of the university in the context of war and post-war recovery. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(2-si), 67-79.
- Pinkerton, P. (2012). Resisting memory: The politics of memorialisation in post-conflict Northern Ireland. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 14(1), 131-152.
- Plokhy, S. (2015). The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine. New York: Basic Books.
- Pshenychnykh, A., Pfoser, A., & Mihelj, S. (2024). When monument battles go digital: Russian-Ukrainian conflicts over material heritage on Telegram. Social Media + Society, 10(2), 1-12.
- Robins, S. (2014). Constructing Meaning from Disappearance: Local Memorialisation of the Missing in Nepal. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 8(1), 104-118.
- Rudin, R. (2019). The Hidden Life of Monuments: Reflections from the Lost Stories Project. Acadiensis, 48(1), 111-131.
- Sang, N. M. (2024). Knowledge management in banking: A bibliometric literature review. Knowledge and Performance Management, 8(1), 1-16.
- Shkandrij, M. (2001). Russia and Ukraine literature and the discourse of empire from Napoleonic to postcolonial times. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
- Szporluk, R. (2000). Russia, Ukraine and the Breakup of Soviet Union. Stanford: Stanford University.
- Telenko, O., & Kurbet, O. (2023). Postcolonial theory and its application to the post-Soviet states. Istoriia narodnoho hospodarstva ta ekonomichnoi dumky Ukrainy, 56, 255-285.
- Viatrovych, V. (2023). Shcho take dekolonizatsiia, chomu vona vazhlyva i yak bude zdiisniuvatysia zghidno zakonu? [What is decolonisation, what is it for and how will it be carried out in accordance with the law?]. Ukrainska pravda – Ukrainian truth. (In Ukrainian).
- Wooi, C. T. (2024). Knowledge Management in the 21st Century: Trends, Developments, and Strategies. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(10), 4234-4257.