Formation of highly intelligent capital at the expense of government spending: Economic effect for Kazakhstan

  • 12 Views
  • 1 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Support for the education system is a strategic measure that ensures the long-term development and growth of a country’s economy. Increased funding in this area enables the training of qualified specialists who can adapt to the challenges of the modern economy. In this regard, the purpose of this study is to assess the impact of government spending on education to generate highly intelligent human capital on economic growth in Kazakhstan from 2009 to 2023 using the least squares method, which includes components of government spending on education, as well as the GLS random effects model, which is used to determine the reliability of results. The results show a strong relationship between economic growth and government spending on secondary technical education (0.2393), a moderate relationship between higher education spending (0.0423) and economic development, and a weak relationship between primary education (–0.0050) and economic growth. Thus, a 1-point increase in expenditures for secondary technical education may lead to a 0.2393% increase in GRP, and a 1-point increase in government spending on higher education will lead to a 0.0423% increase in GRP. However, a significant share of government spending is on basic primary education (58%). Based on this, the financing of the education system requires a shift in the financing vector, with a greater focus on higher and secondary technical education, to achieve a more significant impact on economic development.

Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (AP19680246 “Building up highly intelligent human resources in the conditions of digitalization of the economy of Kazakhstan: problems and prospects”, 2023–2025).

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Distribution of education costs by levels
    • Figure 2. Regression equation
    • Table 1. Variables
    • Table 2. Dynamics of government spending on education levels, %
    • Table 3. Results of the OLS model evaluation for the dependent variable (GDP)
    • Table 4. Results of the Random Effects GLS Model evaluation
    • Conceptualization
      Dana Kangalakova, Olzhas Adilkhanov
    • Funding acquisition
      Dana Kangalakova
    • Methodology
      Dana Kangalakova, Olzhas Adilkhanov
    • Project administration
      Dana Kangalakova, Olzhas Adilkhanov
    • Resources
      Dana Kangalakova, Sharbanu Turdalina, Zaira Satpayeva
    • Supervision
      Dana Kangalakova
    • Validation
      Dana Kangalakova, Zaira Satpayeva
    • Visualization
      Dana Kangalakova, Olzhas Adilkhanov, Dinara Mukhiyayeva
    • Data curation
      Olzhas Adilkhanov, Dinara Mukhiyayeva, Sharbanu Turdalina, Zaira Satpayeva
    • Formal Analysis
      Olzhas Adilkhanov, Dinara Mukhiyayeva, Zaira Satpayeva
    • Investigation
      Olzhas Adilkhanov, Dinara Mukhiyayeva, Sharbanu Turdalina
    • Software
      Olzhas Adilkhanov, Sharbanu Turdalina
    • Writing – original draft
      Dinara Mukhiyayeva, Sharbanu Turdalina, Zaira Satpayeva
    • Writing – review & editing
      Dinara Mukhiyayeva, Sharbanu Turdalina, Zaira Satpayeva