Several colors of scientific consulting: Ukrainian cases
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.09(2).2025.03
-
Article InfoVolume 9 2025, Issue #2, pp. 30-37
- 24 Views
-
5 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Reflexive Preface
The proliferation of unethical scientific consulting practices, particularly in post-Soviet contexts, poses significant threats to academic integrity by transforming legitimate knowledge transfer services into commercialized systems that fabricate academic outputs to meet formal performance metrics rather than supporting genuine research efforts. This study aims to analyze and classify different forms of scientific consulting based on their ethical alignment and function within academic systems, introducing the concept of “scientific consulting mills” as a comprehensive framework for understanding these distorted practices. The study employs qualitative content analysis of Ukrainian and international sources, bibliometric review, and a conceptual typology approach, including a Ukrainian academic landscape case study and a color-coded classification model categorizing service providers based on transparency, legality, and ethical compliance. The analysis reveals that growing demand for formal academic indicators fuels the rise of scientific consulting mills that exploit systemic weaknesses in academic evaluation systems. These mills commodify academic achievements and decouple performance metrics from genuine research contributions, offering services ranging from legitimate professional support to fraudulent activities. The paper includes a case study of the Ukrainian academic landscape, complemented by a classification model (“color-coded” types of scientific consulting) that categorizes service providers and practices based on transparency, legality, and ethical compliance. The proposed “scientific consulting mills” concept offers a broader categorization than existing frameworks, such as paper mills, encompassing diverse services that breach academic ethics while masquerading as legitimate consultancy. This concept provides critical insights for combating academic misconduct.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the European Union grant “NextGenerationEU through the Recovery and Resilience Plan for Slovakia” (No. 09I03-03-V01-00130).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O32, O34
-
References14
-
Tables0
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Advanced paper mill in Ukraine: Scientific consulting mills
- Figure 2. Scientific consulting vs. scientific consulting mills
-
- Battelle. (2023). Official site.
- Bosch, X. (2011). Exorcising ghostwriting…: Ghostwriting could potentially have serious repercussions for science and should therefore be treated as research misconduct. EMBO Reports, 12(6), 489-494.
- Bosch, X., Esfandiari, B., & McHenry, L. (2012). Challenging medical ghostwriting in US courts. PLoS Medicine, 9(1), Article e1001163.
- Cambridge Consultants. (2023). Official site.
- DeTora, L. M. (2016). The spectre of ghostwriting: eroding public trust in physicians, clinical trial integrity and biomedical authorship. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 70(7), 630-633.
- Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. (2024). Official site.
- Newton, P. M. (2018). How common is commercial contract cheating in higher education and is it increasing? A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 3.
- Nim Media. (2019, October 2). Suchasnyi pohliad na naukovyi konsaltynh [A modern view of scientific consulting]. Nauka ta metryka – Science and metrics. (In Ukrainian)
- Osvita.ua. (2022, October 5). Chy maie maibutnie naukovyi konsaltynh v Ukraini? [Does scientific consulting have a future in Ukraine?]. (In Ukrainian).
- Scientific Publications. (2023, September 29). The truth about “Scientific Alliance”. Achievements, figures and facts [Blog Post].
- Singh, S., & Remenyi, D. (2018). Plagiarism and ghostwriting: The rise in academic misconduct. South African Journal of Science, 112(5/6), Article 7.
- Stern, S., & Lemmens, T. (2011). Legal remedies for medical ghostwriting: Imposing fraud liability on guest authors of ghostwritten articles. PLoS Medicine, 8(8), Article e1001070.
- Stretton, S. (2014). Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature. BMJ Open, 4(7), Article e004777.
- Wise, N. (2023, September 4). Ukrainian papermills – Symptom, not a cause. For Better Science.