Institutional AI policies in Ukrainian higher education: A thematic analysis and assessment using the taxonomy of institutional AI policy maturity
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.10(2).2026.01
-
Article InfoVolume 10 2026, Issue #2, pp. 1-19
- 95 Views
-
14 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
The study aims to analyze institutional policies governing the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in Ukrainian universities and assess their regulatory maturity. Drawing on the authors’ Taxonomy of Institutional AI Policy Maturity (AI-PMT), which comprises twelve analytical dimensions, the study examines a sample of 23 publicly available institutional policy documents adopted between 2023 and 2025. The analysis combines qualitative and quantitative approaches. A directed content analysis was used to assign ordinal scores (0-2) across twelve dimensions, enabling the construction of a cumulative maturity index (0-24) for each institution. The results reveal an uneven distribution of regulatory development, with more elaborated provisions related to teaching and learning, and comparatively less developed components addressing research practices, data governance, and infrastructural support. To synthesize these patterns, an analytical typology of institutions was developed based on cumulative maturity scores, identifying three broad groups that differ in the degree of regulatory completeness and procedural specification. In parallel, thematic analysis of policy content identified recurring patterns, including the normalization of AI use in education, the emphasis on transparency and disclosure, the prevalence of precautionary approaches to data and confidentiality, and several contested provisions. Comparison with international policy frameworks suggests that Ukrainian universities broadly align with global normative trends in principles, but exhibit limited operationalization of governance mechanisms and research-related provisions. The findings highlight structural imbalances in institutional AI governance and underscore the need to further develop research-oriented regulation, institutional support mechanisms, and coordinated policy approaches.
Acknowledgment
We thank the Armed Forces of Ukraine for providing security for this work, which was made possible only thanks to the resilience and bravery of the Ukrainian Army.
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I23, O33, D83, L38, M14, O38
-
References45
-
Tables4
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Heatmap of AI-PMT dimensions across institutions
- Figure 2. Distribution of cumulative AI policy maturity scores by year of adoption (2023–2025)
-
- Table 1. Taxonomy of institutional AI policy maturity (AI-PMT)
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics of cumulative AI policy maturity scores by year of adoption
- Table 3. Clusters of institutional AI policies by maturity level (AI-PMT)
- Table 4. Thematic patterns in institutional AI policies
-
- Al-Matari, O. M., Helal, I. M., Mazen, S. A., & Elhennawy, S. (2021). Adopting security maturity model to the organizations’ capability model. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 22(2), 193-199.
- Almuhammadi, S., & Alsaleh, M. (2017). Information Security Maturity Model for Nist Cyber Security Framework. In Sixth International Conference on Information Technology Convergence and Services. Academy & Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC).
- An, Y., Yu, J. H., & James, S. (2025). Investigating the higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 10.
- Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers (STM). (2023). Generative AI in scholarly communications: Ethical and practical guidelines for the use of generative AI in the publication process.
- Chugai, O., & Havrylenko, K. (2024). ChatGpt: attitudes and experiences of technical university students in Ukraine. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 101(3), 15-27.
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2024). Authorship and AI tools.
- European Union (EU). (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 1689.
- Fiialka, S., Kornieva, Z., & Honcharuk, T. (2023). ChatGPT in Ukrainian Education: Problems and Prospects. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(17), 236-250.
- Finikov, T., Lyman, I., Kovachov, S., & Suchikova, Y. (2025). Relocated universities of Ukraine: Spatial-temporal mapping, trajectories, and lessons from two waves of displacement (2014–2025). Knowledge and Performance Management, 9(2), 142-162.
- Guirlet, M., & Schneider, R. (2024). Developing and Improving the Capability of Scientific Communities in Open Research Data: A Maturity Continuum Model: Concepts, Elements, and Applications. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 12(1).
- Hryn, O., Shevel, A., Shcherbyna, N., Kubrak, O., & Zadorozhnyi, K. (2025). Implementation of artificial intelligence in the system for detecting academic dishonesty in Ukrainian secondary and higher education institutions. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 13(2), 445-458.
- Humble, N. (2025). Higher Education AI Policies – A Document Analysis of University Guidelines. European Journal of Education, 60(3), e70214.
- Jiang, Y., Xie, L., & Cao, X. (2025). Exploring the Effectiveness of Institutional Policies and Regulations for Generative AI Usage in Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly, 79(4), e70054.
- Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348.
- Kim, J. (2021). Determining research data services maturity: The role of library leadership and stakeholder involvement. Library & Information Science Research, 43(2), 101092.
- Kramar, N., Bedrych, Y., & Shelkovnikova, Z. (2024). Ukrainian PhD students' attitudes toward AI language processing tools in the context of English for academic purposes. Advanced Education, 12(24), 41-57.
- Lopatina, H., Tsybuliak, N., Popova, A., Bohdanov, I., & Suchikova, Y. (2023). University without Walls: Experience of Berdyansk State Pedagogical University during the war. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(2), 4-14.
- Luo (Jess), J. (2024). A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: a call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 651-664.
- McDonald, N., Johri, A., Ali, A., & Hingle, A. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Evidence from an Analysis of Institutional Policies and Guidelines. ArXiv.
- Mytsyk, H., & Suchikova, Y. (2025). Stench of Errors or the Shine of Potential: The Challenge of (Ir)Responsible Use of ChatGPT in Speech-Language Pathology. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 60(4), e70088.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). U.S. Department of Commerce.
- Omelchuk, S. A. (2024). Institutional programs of support for scientific activities at Kherson State University during the war and relocation. In European Integration of Ukrainian Science: Issues and Challenges (pp. 31-36). Baltija Publishing. (In Ukrainian).
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449). OECD Publishing.
- Palamar, S., & Naumenko, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Use Without Violating the Principles of Academic Integrity. Educological Discourse, 44(1), 68-83.
- Parker, L., Loper, A. J., Hayes, J., Karakas, A., White, S., & Hallman, H. (2025). Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence policies in universities across five countries. Discover Computing, 28, 267.
- Popova, A., Kovachov, S., Lopatina, H., Tsybuliak, N., Suchikova, Y., & Bohdanov, I. (2023). High-Quality Digital Bichronous Education for Nanoengineers During the War in Ukraine: Does Technology Knowledge Matter? In 2023 IEEE 5th International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy System (MEES). IEEE.
- Reis, T. L., Mathias, M. A. S., & de Oliveira, O. J. (2016). Maturity models: identifying the state-of-the-art and the scientific gaps from a bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 110(2), 643-672.
- Resnik, D. B., & Hosseini, M. (2025). Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary? Accountability in Research, 33(2), 1-13.
- Saito, N. (2024) The Comparative Analysis of National Policies for Research and Education Regarding Usage of Generative AI in Japan, the USA and the UK. 24th Biennial Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Seoul, Korea.
- Spivakovsky, O. V., Omelchuk, S. A., Kobets, V. V., Poltoratskyi, M., Malchykova, D. S., & Lemeshchuk, O. (2025). Institutional Regulation of Using Ai-Based Services Through the Kano Model: The Case of Kherson State University. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 108(4), 129-157.
- Spivakovsky, O. V., Omelchuk, S. A., Kobets, V. V., Valko, N. V., & Malchykova, D. S. (2023a). Institutional Policies on Artificial Intelligence in University Learning, Teaching and Research. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 97(5), 181-202.
- Spivakovsky, O., Omelchuk, S., Malchykova, D., Tsapiv, A., & Lemeshchuk, O. (2023b). Academic solidarity and digitization: Management of a displaced university. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(2), 40-51.
- Suchikova, Y. (2025). Risks and Realities of Speculative Ethics: Lessons from Nanotechnology for the Artificial Intelligence Discourse. Nanoethics, 19, 15
- Suchikova, Y., & Nazarovets, S. (2025). Extending the CARE Principles: Managing data for vulnerable communities in wartime and humanitarian crises. Scientific Data, 12(1), 420.
- Suchikova, Y., & Tsybuliak, N. (2024). ChatGPT isn’t an author, but a contribution taxonomy is needed. Accountability in Research, 32(8), 1590-1595.
- Suchikova, Y., & Tsybuliak, N. (2025). The Purity Myth: Why Stigmatizing GAI in Academic Writing Is Harmful. Science Communication, 47(5).
- Suchikova, Y., Popova, A., Lopatina, H., & Tsybuliak, N. (2025a). Small Is Sexy: Rethinking Article Length in the Age of AI. Learned Publishing, 38(2), e1659.
- Suchikova, Y., Tsybuliak, N., Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Nazarovets, S. (2025b). GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing. Accountability in Research, 33(3), 1-27.
- Teremetskyi, V., Burylo, Y., Zozuliak, O., Koshmanov, M., Polyova, N., & Olha, P. (2024). Academic Integrity in The Age of Artificial Intelligence: World Trends and Outlook for Ukraine from The Legal Perspective. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), 22(1).
- Tsybuliak, N., & Suchikova, Y. (2024). Don’t let watermarks stigmatize AI-generated research content. Nature, 635, 815.
- Tsybuliak, N., Lopatina, H., Shevchenko, L., Popova, A., Kovachov, S., Suchikova, Y., & Popov, A. I. (2024). Researchers of Ukrainian universities in wartime conditions: Needs, challenges and opportunities. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(9), 100012.
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2022). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO.
- Vovk, O., & Kryvoshyia, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence in academic writing: composing a for-and-against essay. PrOsvita, 1, 19-28.
- Wendler, R. (2012). The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 54(12), 1317-1339.
- Xie, Q., Li, M., & Enkhtur, A. (2024). Exploring Generative AI Policies in Higher Education: A Comparative Perspective from China, Japan, Mongolia, and the USA. ArXiv.


