Transformational leadership and change readiness and a moderating role of perceived bureaucratic structure: an empirical investigation

  • Published March 28, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Badri Abbasi
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.03
  • Article Info
    Volume 15 2017, Issue #1, pp. 35-44
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    1 articles
  • 1344 Views
  • 551 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between transformational leadership and change readiness through perceived bureaucratic structure among government employees in Rasht. As a methodology, descriptive method was applied using questionnaire to collect data. The studied population consisted of 600 employees from three state organizations including Municipality, Gilan Tax Department and Gilan Justice Court. According to Morgan table, the sample size was estimated at 234. This study examined six hypotheses, which were tested using multiple regression method. The results showed that transformational leadership had a positive direct effect on employee change readiness and its dimensions. However, substitution of the bureaucratic structure in the model eliminated the effect. Finally, the hypothesis on the effect of transformational leadership on change readiness through perceived bureaucratic structure was rejected.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Fig. 1. Conceptual framework
    • Fig. 2. Confirmatory factor analysis for transformational leadership
    • Fig. 3. Confirmatory factor analysis for change readiness
    • Fig. 4 Confirmatory factor analysis for bureaucratic structure
    • Table 1. Distribution of samples in organizations
    • Table 2. The results of confirmatory factor analysis
    • Table 3. Cronbach’s Alpha
    • Table 4. Demographics of respondents
    • Table 5. Descriptive study
    • Table 6. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for variables
    • Table 7. Regression analysis
    • Table 8. Multiple regression analysis of transformational leadership on employee change readiness through perceived bureaucratic structure
    • Burnes, B. (2011). Introduction: Why does change fail, and what can we do about it? Journal of Change Management, 11 (4), pp. 445-450.
    • Chaghari, M., Tofighi, S., Amerian, A. & Karimi-Zarchi, A. (2012). Different effects of organizational change and transformation on organizational health, Basij strategic studies, 15 (54), pp. 83-96.
    • Dhillon, G., Syed, R. & Pedron, C. (2016). Interpreting information security culture: An organizational transformation case study, Computers & Security, 56, pp. 63-69.
    • Dimock, M.E. (1944). Bureaucracy self-examined, Public Administration Review, 4 (3), pp. 197-207.
    • Frazja, M. & Khademi, M. (2012). The relationship between trasformational and interactive leadership styles and organizational change readiness, New ideas in Educational Sciences, 6 (4), pp. 49-70.
    • Geijsel, F., Sleeger, S.P., Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2003). Transformational leadership effect on teacher’s Commitment and effort toward school reform, Journal of Educational Administration, 41 (3), pp. 228-256.
    • Gill, R. (2010). Theory & practice of leadership. British, London, Sage Publication.
    • Holloway, S.D. (2015). Leading and Engaging Sustainable Change: Achieving Organizational Transformation through the Transformative Methodologies of the Change Acceleration Process and Lean Six Sigma (Doctoral dissertation, Cardinal Stritch University).
    • Isett, K.R., Glied, S.A.M., Sparer, M.S. & Brown, L.D. (2012). When change becomes transformation: A case study of change management in Medicaid offices in New York City, Public Management Review, 15 (1), pp. 1-17.
    • Jalilian, H., Moradi, M. & Kamaei, H. (2010). Transformational leadership and creativity of employees, Police Human Resources, 7 (32), pp. 59-72.
    • Juechter, W.M., Fisher, C. & Alford, R.J. (1998). Five conditions for high-performance cultures, Training And Development-Alexandria-American Society For Training And Development, 52, pp. 63-68.
    • Kickert, W.J.M. (2010). Managing emergent and complex change: The case of the Dutchagencification, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76 (3), 489 p.
    • Linstone, H.A. & Mitroff, I.I. (1994). The challenge of the 21st century: Managing technology and ourselves in a shrinking world. SUNY Press.
    • Malhotra, N. & Hinings, C.B. (2015). Unpacking continuity and change as a process of organizational transformation, Long Range Planning, 48 (1), pp. 1-22.
    • Mousavi, S.-A. (2005). Organizational change and transformation, Correcting and training, 43, pp. 44-46.
    • Nabavi, A., Hasanzadeh, A. & Alameh, S. (2013). Effect of bureaucratic characteristics on work alleniation of employees, Social problems of Iran, 4 (2), pp. 131-154.
    • Pawar, B.S. (2003). Central Conceptual issues, in transformational, Leadership Research & organization Development Journal, 24 (7), pp. 397-406.
    • Pearce, C.L., Sims Jr, H.P. Cox, J.F. Ball, Go, Schnell, E. (2003). Transactors, Transformers and beyond, Journal of inanagement Development, 22 (4), pp. 273-278.
    • Raeeisi, A. (2006). Change management in state and police organizations, Police knowledge, 8 (2), pp. 99-117.
    • Rahmanseresht, H. & Moghaddam, A. (2007). The role of subjective models in organizational change process, Management Knowledge, 78, pp. 3-24.
    • Robbins, S.P. (2002). Organizational Behavior, 9th edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    • Russ, T.L. (2008). Communicating change: A review and critical analysis ofprogrammatic and participatory implementation approach, Journal of ChangeManagement, 8 (3-4), pp. 199-211.
    • Shamir, B., House, R.J. & Arthur, M.B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory, Organization science, 4 (4), pp. 577-594.
    • Soltani, I. (2005). The role of public relations in strategic leadership of organizational change, 8th art, 38, pp. 19-23.
    • Thistle, B.M. & Molinaro, V. (2016). Driving Organizational Transformation Through Strong Leadership Accountability: It’s Time For HR Leaders to Step Up, People and Strategy, 39 (3), pp. 28-31.
    • Tseng, S.H. (2010). The correlation between organizational culture and behavior modification on corporate performance, Journal of knowledge management, 14 (2), pp. 269-284.
    • Van der Voet, J. (2014). The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure, European Management Journal, 32 (3), pp. 373-382.
    • Van der Voet, J., Kuipers, B.S. & Groeneveld, S. (2016). Implementing Change in Public Organizations: The relationship between leadership and affective commitment to change in a public sector context, Public Management Review, 18 (6), pp. 842-865.
Related Articles

  • Transformational leadership for organizational change in the Lebanese public sector

    Bissane HarbORCID , Dina SidaniORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.15
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #2         pp. 205-216 Views: 909 Downloads: 47 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The public sector is facing multiple changes. In a constantly changing environment, that is more and more demanding in terms of innovation and performance, the concept of leadership is of particular importance, as it is one of the few tools available to public managers.
    Based on the transformational leadership theory, the aim of this study is to explore how transformational leadership characteristics influence organizational change within the public sector in Lebanon. To serve this purpose, a qualitative approach is adopted based on a series of semi-focused interviews conducted with ten public managers running 10 public administrations. These administrations have undergone significant changes over the past five years.
    The results point out the importance of transformational behaviors adopted by public managers in leading change within the public sector in Lebanon, despite the multiple obstacles. They confirmed the role of two transformational dimensions related to idealized influence and inspirational motivation in the successful implementation of organizational change. This study contributes to better understanding of the role of transformational leadership in promoting change in the public sector.

  • Leadership and social responsibility from the perspective of gender

    Juan Manuel Andrade NaviaORCID , Elías Ramírez PlazasORCID , Yenny Catherine DiazORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.23
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #2         pp. 303-312 Views: 866 Downloads: 4 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This study established the relationship between transformational leadership and social responsibility practices in women’s organizations that produce special coffees in southern Colombia. To measure these variables using Likert scales, two questionnaires were applied: the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire 5X short version (MLQ-5X) to measure transformational leadership, and a tool developed by the researchers to measure social responsibility. Cronbach’s Alpha (α) values for the two variables showed excellent consistency (α = 0.95 and 0.90 for transformational leadership and social responsibility, respectively). For the analysis of the information, the structural equation model was used to validate the hypothesis using the SPSS AMOS software. The results indicate a significant and positive correlation between the transformational leadership practices and the perception of social responsibility, especially in the dimensions of idealized influence (behavior and attributed) and intellectual stimulation of transformational leadership, and in the dimensions of labor issues and social responsibility. These findings are consistent with existing literature, and complement aspects not addressed before (e.g. correlation between transformational leadership and social responsibility practices in women’s organizations) in the framework of gender in non-conventional organizations.

  • Determinants of nurse performance in accredited Indonesian private hospitals

    Raden Roro Lia ChairinaORCID , Raden Andi Sularso , Diana Sulianti K Tobing , Bambang Irawan doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.15
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #1         pp. 163-175 Views: 643 Downloads: 36 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This study analyzes the effect of transformational leadership on nurse performance using intervening variables of social competence, self-efficacy, and burnout. The partial least square data analysis method with an explanatory research type is used. Primary data are obtained via a questionnaire. A nurse population of 160 from five private hospitals in Indonesia’s East Java Region was analyzed using proportional random sampling. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and partial least squares (PLS). The result of this study proved that transformational leadership has no significant effect on nurse performance, however, it affects significantly on social competence, self-efficacy, and has significant negative effect on burnout. The low performance of nurse was caused by the main job that is providing service for patient and doing administration work for BPJS, which require plenty of time, that the inseparable part of a nurse life is burnout, regarding the high mobility in providing service for patient. Social competence has a significant positive effect on nurse performance, self-efficacy has a significant positive effect on burnout, self-efficacy has a significant positive effect on nurse performance, and burnout has a significant negative effect on nurse performance. Novelty of this study is self-efficacy that has a significant positive effect on social competence.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management