Measuring fiscal structural reform intensity: The case of Armenia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.14(3).2025.07
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2025, Issue #3, pp. 93-104
- 79 Views
-
7 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Fiscal structural reforms play a decisive role in strengthening macroeconomic stability, enhancing public sector efficiency, and improving institutional resilience in transition economies. Armenia represents a particularly relevant case, where successive reform waves have been closely linked to external adjustment programs and domestic political cycles. The purpose of this study is to measure the intensity of fiscal reforms in Armenia and to evaluate their dynamics over the period 1995–2024. For this purpose, a Fiscal Structural Reform Index (FSRI) is constructed, integrating revenue, expenditure, and institutional reforms based on IMF MONA benchmark data. Reforms are coded by significance (0.25 = minor, 0.50 = medium, 1.00 = major), adjusted for persistence through a geometric decay factor (0.8), and aggregated using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The first principal component explains 71.2% of the total variance, ensuring the robustness of the composite index. The results indicate that reform intensity in Armenia exhibits a cyclical pattern, peaking during IMF-supported programs in 1999–2001, 2009–2011, and 2016–2018, and moderating during periods of political transition. Institutional reforms display the highest persistence, accounting for the largest share of the index, while revenue and expenditure reforms are more episodic. The analysis demonstrates that both external conditionality and internal political shifts strongly influence reform momentum. The FSRI provides a replicable framework for tracking fiscal reform intensity, supporting policy design, and strengthening structural diagnostics in transition and developing economies.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H20, H50, O23, C43
-
References35
-
Tables3
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Scree plot of principal components derived from fiscal reform subcomponents
- Figure 2. Trends in fiscal structural reform subcomponents (1995–2024)
- Figure 3. Annual contribution of reform components to FSRI, 1995–2024
- Figure 4. Heatmap of fiscal reform intensity by type (1995–2024)
-
- Table 1. Classification of fiscal structural reform components
- Table 2. Principal components analysis result (PCA)
- Table 3. Key variables and calculated dataset for the Fiscal Structural Reform Index (FSRI)
-
- Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Chapter 6 Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In Handbook of Economic Growth (vol. 1, pp. 385-472). Elsevier.
- Afonso, A., Ebert, W., Schuknecht, L., & Thöne, M. (2005). Quality of public finances and growth (Working Paper No. 438). European Central Bank.
- Alesina, A., Barbiero, O., Favero, C., Giavazzi, F., & Paradisi, M. (2017). The effects of fiscal consolidations: Theory and evidence (NBER Working Paper No. 23385). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Allen, R., Hemming, R., & Potter, B. H. (Eds.). (2013). The international handbook of public financial management. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
- Bird, R. M., & Zolt, E. M. (2014). Redistribution via taxation: The limited role of the personal income tax in developing countries. Annals of Economics and Finance, 15(2), 625-683.
- Bonfiglioli, A., & Gancia, G. (2013). Uncertainty, electoral incentives, and political myopia. The Economic Journal, 123(568), 373-400.
- Campos, N. F., & Horváth, R. (2011). Reform redux: Measurement, determinants and growth implications. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(2), 227-237.
- Campos, N. F., Coricelli, F., & Moretti, L. (2014). Economic growth and political integration: Estimating the benefits from membership in the European Union using the synthetic counterfactuals method (IZA Discussion Paper No. 8162).
- Cangiano, M., Curristine, T., & Lazare, M. (2013). Public financial management and its emerging architecture. International Monetary Fund.
- Ciminelli, G., Ernst, E., Merola, R., & Giuliodori, M. (2019). The composition effects of tax-based consolidation on income inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, 57, 107-124.
- Crandall, W. J. (2010). Revenue administration: Performance measurement in tax administration (Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2010/011). International Monetary Fund.
- D’Costa, S., Garcilazo, J. E., & Martins, J. O. (2019). Impact of macro-structural reforms on the productivity growth of regions: Distance to the frontier matters. Papers of the Regional Science, 98(1), 133-167.
- Duval, R., Furceri, D., & Miethe, J. (2018). The needle in the haystack: What drives labor and product market reforms in advanced countries? (IMF Working Paper No. WP/18/101). International Monetary Fund.
- Elgin, C., Kose, M. A., Ohnsorge, F., & Yu, S. (2021). Understanding informality. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Everaert, L., & Schule, W. (2008). Why it pays to synchronize structural reforms in the euro area across markets and countries. IMF Staff Papers, 55(2), 356-366.
- Fratzscher, M. (2008). Communication and exchange rate policy. Journal of Macroeconomics, 30(4), 1651-1672.
- Ghosh, A. R., Kim, J. I., Mendoza, E. G., Ostry, J. D., & Qureshi, M. S. (2013). Fiscal fatigue, fiscal space and debt sustainability in advanced economies. The Economic Journal, 123(566), F4-F30.
- Gollwitzer, S., Kvintradze, E., Prakash, T., Zanna, L., Dabla-Norris, E., Allen, R. I., Yackovlev, I., & Lledo, V. D. (2010). Budget institutions and fiscal performance in low-income countries (IMF Working Paper No. WP/10/80). International Monetary Fund.
- Hallerberg, M., Strauch, R. R., & Von Hagen, J. (2009). Fiscal governance in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
- Hausmann, R., Rodrik, D., & Velasco, A. (2005). Growth diagnostics (Growth Lab Working Paper No. 3). Harvard University Center for International Development.
- Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), Article 20150202.
- Keen, M. (2012). Taxation and development: Again (IMF Working Paper No. WP/12/220). International Monetary Fund.
- Kraay, A. (2012). How large is the Government Spending Multiplier? Evidence from World Bank Lending. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(2), 829-887.
- Lora, E. (2001). Structural reforms in Latin America: What has been reformed and how to measure it (Working Paper No. 466). Inter-American Development Bank.
- Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69(2), 263-279.
- Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169-190.
- Nozaki, M., Clements, B., & Gupta, S. (2011). What happens to social spending in IMF-supported programs? (IMF Staff Discussion Note No. SDN/11/15). International Monetary Fund.
- Ostry, J., Prati, A., & Spilimbergo, A. (2009). Structural reforms and economic performance in advanced and developing countries (Occasional Paper No. 268). International Monetary Fund.
- Panizza, U., & Presbitero, A. F. (2013). Public debt and economic growth in advanced economies: A survey. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 149(2), 175-204.
- Prati, A., Onorato, M. G., & Papageorgiou, C. (2012). Which reforms work and under what institutional environment? Evidence from a new data set on structural reforms. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 946-968.
- Rajkumar, A. S., & Swaroop, V. (2008). Public spending and outcomes: Does governance matter? Journal of Development Economics, 86(1), 96-111.
- Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them (NBER Working Paper No. 7540). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Schick, A. (2009). Budgeting for fiscal space and budget sustainability. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 9(2), 7-28.
- Tanzi, V., & Zee, H. H. (1997). Fiscal policy and long-run growth. IMF Staff Papers, 44(2), 179-209.
- World Bank. (2023). Armenia public expenditure review: Improving spending efficiency.