Implementing cost accounting in Saudi higher education: Drivers, progress, and resource implications
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.15(1).2026.03
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2026, Issue #1, pp. 27-42
- 7 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
This study examines the adoption and implementation of cost accounting practices in Saudi Arabian public universities following their shift from cash-based to accrual-based accounting. Guided by the resource-based view (RBV) framework, it tests four hypotheses related to drivers of cost adoption, cost tracking and allocation abilities, calculation method frequencies, and resources needed for successful cost implementation. Data from 171 financial managers and accountants across all 30 public universities were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlations, and regression models. Results reveal a negative correlation between cost adoption and organizational factors, with external pressures – including regulatory requirements and negotiations over funding – serving as the primary catalysts. Universities demonstrate a strong capacity to track and allocate direct costs, with over 90% able to manage them; however, indirect cost management remains limited, with only 12% able to allocate indirect costs, indicating early-stage development. Cost implementation is further positively associated with the use of detailed cost calculation and allocation methods and perceived organizational resource needs, including financial policies, skilled personnel, and advanced management systems. Findings suggest that, despite external pressures, resource constraints hamper full implementation. These findings support the RBV assertion that internal capabilities are crucial for gaining a strategic advantage. Successful cost implementation depends on internal resource development and organizational capacity-building, which can transform cost accounting from a symbolic compliance exercise into a strategic tool for transparency, decision-making, and institutional efficiency.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M40, H11, H52, H83
-
References59
-
Tables12
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Demographic information
- Table 2. Reasons for adopting cost accounting in universities
- Table 3. Costs tracking and allocation ability
- Table 4. Costs calculation method frequency
- Table 5. Perception of required resources for cost accounting implementation
- Table 6. Correlation analysis of the study variables
- Table 7. Linear regression analysis of the study variables
- Table A1. Section 1: General Information
- Table A2. Section 2: Part A: Reasons for adopting cost accounting in universities
- Table A3. Section 2: Part B: Cost tracking and allocation ability
- Table A4. Section 2: Part C: Cost calculation method frequency
- Table A5. Section 2: Part D: Required resources for full cost accounting implementation
-
- Abawari, A. M., Debela, K., & Abegaz, M. B. (2024). The effects of organizational culture on change management in Oromia public sectors: The mediating role of leadership styles. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2375623.
- Abdulkarim, M. E., Umlai, M. I., & Al-Saudi, L. F. (2020). Exploring the role of innovation in the level of readiness to adopt IPSAS. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 16(3), 469-495.
- Agasisti, T., & Catalano, G. (2013). Debate: Innovation in the Italian public higher education system: Introducing accrual accounting. Public Money & Management, 33(2), 92-94.
- Agasisti, T., Catalano, G., Di Carlo, F., & Erbacci, A. (2015). Accrual accounting in Italian universities: A technical perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(6), 494-508.
- Aljabr, A., & Al-Mutawa, A. (2025). The status of the cost accounting in the public sector: A field study of the Saudi public sector. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Economics and Administration, 39(1), 119-142.
- Alnesafi, D. A. (Ed.). (2025). Remodeling public finance: Shifting from cash accounting to accrual accounting. In N. M. Alsharari (Ed.), Public Finance and Accounting. IntechOpen.
- Alonge, E. O., Dudu, O. F., & Alao, O. B. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on financial reporting and accountability in emerging markets. International Journal of Science and Technology Research Archive, 7(2), 25-49.
- Alqudah, O. M., Noorhayati, M., & Salleh, S. I. M. (2022). Difficulties in accounting system implementation for service costs in the public sector. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), Article 2150119.
- Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Performance management in the public sector: The ultimate challenge. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(1), 1-22.
- Barney, J. (2000). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. In J. A.C. Baum & F. Dobbin (Eds.), Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management.
- Bracci, E., Papi, L., Bigoni, M., Deidda Gagliardo, E., & Bruns, H.-J. (2019). Public value and public sector accounting research: A structured literature review. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(1), 103-136.
- Brusca, I., Margarita, L., & Condor, V. (2019). Management accounting innovations in universities: A tool for decision making or for negotiation? Public Performance & Management Review, 42(5), 1138-1163.
- Bryson, J., Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2007). Putting the resource-based view of strategy and distinctive competencies to work in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 702-717.
- Cepêda, C., & Monteiro, A. (2020). The accountant’s perception of the usefulness of financial information in decision making – A study in Portugal. Review of Business Management, 22, 363-380.
- Chatti, A., Damak Ayadi, S., & Jeriji, M. (2025). Drivers for IPSAS adoption: Context-related factors in public sector innovation. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(10), 654-669.
- Clark, C., Cluver, M., Fishman, T., & Kunkel, D. (2025). 2025 higher education trends – A look at the challenges and opportunities shaping America’s higher education sector. Deloitte Center for Government Insights.
- Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Psychology Press, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Da Silva, G. P. S., & Behr, A. (2025). Cost information needs for Brazilian local politicians’ decision-making. Public Money & Management.
- Dharmayuni, L., Hilda, R., Dyah, S., & Kartika Dewi, M. (2024). Value relevance of accrual information in public sector: Facts from practices. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(12), 775-798.
- Dimitrić, M., Škalamera-Alilović, D., & Duhovnik, M. (2016). Public cost and management accounting system implementation and performance: An integrative approach. International Journal of Public Policy, 12(3-6), 190-209.
- EUA. (2008). Financially sustainable universities. Towards full costing in European universities.
- Glater, J. D. (2015). Student debt and higher education risk. California Law Review, 103(6), 1561-1614.
- Grant, R. (1999). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33, 3-23.
- Guesalaga, R., Gabrielsson, M., Rogers, B., Ryals, L., & Cuevas, J. M. (2018). Which resources and capabilities underpin strategic key account management? Industrial Marketing Management, 75, 160-172.
- Hamid, F. (2021). Obstacles and reasons for non-adoption of activity-based costing/management at Saudi Universities. 2021 International Conference of Women in Data Science at Taif University (WiDSTaif). Taif, Saudi Arabia.
- Hansen, J. R., & Ferlie, E. (2016). Applying strategic management theories in public sector organizations: Developing a typology. Public Management Review, 18(1), 1-19.
- Haslam, C., & Marriott, N. (2006). Accounting for reform: Funding and transformation in the four nation’s hospital services. Accounting Forum, 30(4), 389-405.
- Hassan, M. K. (2005). Management accounting and organisational change: An institutional perspective. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 1(2), 125-140.
- Horngren, C., Datar, T., & Srikant M. (2015). Cost accounting; A managerial emphasis (15th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
- IFAC. (2000). Perspectives on cost accounting for government. International Public Sector Study.
- IMF. (2021). Fiscal monitor: A fair shot.
- Jovanović, T., Ivana, D.-L., & Vašiček, D. (2019). Implementation of cost accounting as the economic pillar of management accounting systems in public hospitals – The case of Slovenia and Croatia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 3754-3772.
- Kihuba, E., Gheorghe, A., Bozzani, F., English, M., & Griffiths, U. (2016). Opportunities and challenges for implementing cost accounting systems in the Kenyan health system. Global Health Action, 9(1).
- Lau, E., Lonti, Z., & Schultz, R. (2017). Challenges in the measurement of public sector productivity in OECD countries. International Productivity Monitor, 32, 180-195.
- Liguori, M., Mariafrancesca, S., & Steccolini, I. (2012). Some like it non-financial…Politicians’ and managers’ views on the importance of performance information. Public Management Review, 14(7), 903-922.
- Lutilsky, I. D., Žmuk, B., & Dragija, M. (2016). Cost accounting as a possible solution for financial sustainability of Croatian public hospitals. Croatian Economic Survey, The Institute of Economics, 18(2), 5-38.
- Macheridis, N., & Paulsson, A. (2021). Tracing accountability in higher education. Research in Education, 110(1), 78-97.
- Magretta, J. (2011). Understanding Michael Porter: The essential guide to competition and strategy. Harvard Business Press.
- Malmqvist, J., Hellberg, K., Möllås, G., Rose, R., & Shevlin, M. (2019). Conducting the pilot study: A neglected part of the research process? Methodological findings supporting the importance of piloting in qualitative research studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18.
- Modugno, G., & Di Carlo, F. (2019). Financial sustainability of higher education institutions: A challenge for the accounting system. In J. Caruana, I. Brusca, E. Caperchione, S. Cohen, & F. ManesRossi (Eds.), Financial Sustainability of Public Sector Entities: The Relevance of Accounting Frameworks (pp. 165-184). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
- Mohr, Z. (2017). Cost accounting in government: Theory and applications (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
- Monteiro, A., Vale, J., Cepêda, C. E., & Leite, E. (2021). Internal control system quality and decision-making success: The role of the financial information quality. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(3), 285-294.
- Monteiro, A., Vale, J., Leite, E., Lis, M., & Pysz, J. (2022). The impact of information systems and non-financial information on company success. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 45, Article 100557.
- Moynihan, D. P., & Hawes, D. P. (2012). Responsiveness to reform values: The influence of the environment on performance information use. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), S95-S105.
- Musa, O., & Abraham, M. (2025). The impact of information and communication technology (ICT) adoption on accounting practices and financial reporting accuracy in public institutions. International Journal of African Research Sustainability Studies, 9(2), 54-63.
- Omalaja, M. A., & Eruola, O. A. (2011). Strategic management theory: Concepts, analysis and critiques in relation to corporate competitive advantage from the resource-based philosophy. Economic Analysis, 44(1-2), 59-77.
- Pasape, L., & Godson, E. (2022). Challenges affecting effective implementation of financial management information systems in local government authorities in Tanzania as part of the digital ecosystem. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 11(3), 522-548.
- Pattaro, A. F., Moura e Sá, P., & de Kruijf, J. A. M. (2022). Transparency and accountability in higher education as a response to external stakeholders and rules: A comparison between three country-case studies. In E. Caperchione & C. Bianchi (Eds.), Governance and Performance Management in Public Universities: Current Research and Practice (pp. 15-47). Springer International Publishing.
- Rogošić, A. (2021). Public sector cost accounting and information usefulness in decision-making. Public Sector Economics, 45(2), 209-227.
- Rompotis, G., & Balios, D. (2025). Benefits of IPSAS and their differences from IFRS: A discussion paper. EuroMed Journal of Business, 20(1), 94-113.
- Ryan, B., Scapens, R., & Theobald, M. (2002). Research method and methodology in finance and accounting. Thomson.
- Schoute, M., & Budding, T. (2017). Changes in cost system design and intensity of use in times of crisis: Evidence from Dutch local government. In Advances in Management Accounting (vol. 29, pp. 1-31). Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Szymaniec-Mlicka, K. (2014). Resource-based view in strategic management of public organizations – A review of the literature. Management, 18(2), 19-30.
- Ter Bogt, H. J. (2008). Management accounting change and new public management in local government: a reassessment of ambitions and results – An institutionalist approach to accounting change in the Dutch public sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(3), 209-241.
- Umar, S., Ahmad, J., Bukhori, M., Ali, K., & Wan Hussain, W.M. (2025). Transforming higher-education-institutes: Impact of change management on sustainable performance through transformational leadership and knowledge management. Sustainability, 17(6), Article 2445.
- Van Helden, J., & Huijben, M. (2014). Controlling overhead in public sector organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(6), 475-485.
- Van Helden, J., & Uddin, S. (2016). Public sector management accounting in emerging economies: A literature review. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 41, 34-62.
- Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
- Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business research method (9th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.


