Conceptual model of the social entrepreneurship ecosystem in the social security system of the defense-industrial complex of Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/slrtp.15(2).2025.05
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2025, Issue #2, pp. 56-76
- 6 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Russia’s full-scale military aggression against Ukraine has profoundly transformed the defense-industrial complex (DIC), which as of 2025 includes more than 800 enterprises with over 300,000 employees. The social welfare needs of defense-related populations have intensified: 1.56 million veterans, 3.7 million internally displaced persons (IDPs), and their families require support exceeding the capacity of existing protection mechanisms. Social entrepreneurship (SE) and the defense industry have been studied in isolation, while the potential of their interaction lacks theoretical substantiation. The purpose of the article is to theoretically substantiate a conceptual model of the SE ecosystem within the social welfare system of Ukraine’s DIC under martial law conditions. The study employs a systematic literature review, comparative analysis of theoretical approaches to SE (Earned Income, EMES, WISE), and secondary data analysis on the defense sector and target groups. Synthesizing the ecosystem approach, hybrid organization theory, and work integration models, the authors develop a conceptual model encompassing a three-tier architecture (macro, meso, micro levels), a five-group stakeholder interest matrix, four types of resource flows, and a five-level maturity indicator system. Comparison confirmed the highest applicability of EMES and WISE to the defense sector. Diagnostics revealed critical gaps: IDP unemployment stands at 17%, temporary housing occupancy reaches 90%, and one-third of IDPs lack earning opportunities. The developed indicators place the ecosystem at an initial-basic maturity level. The findings substantiate the ecosystem approach to SE in the defense sector and provide a theoretical foundation for specialized SE legislation, social procurement mechanisms, and entrepreneurship education for veterans and DIC employees.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L31, I38, H56, J21
-
References73
-
Tables13
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Архітектура екосистеми СП в системі соціального забезпечення ОПК
- Figure 2. Схема ресурсних потоків в екосистемі соціального підприємництва ОПК
-
- Table 1. Хронологічна еволюція екосистемного підходу в дослідженнях підприємництва
- Table 2. Теоретичні підходи до СП
- Table 3. Структура екосистеми СП в системі соціального забезпечення ОПК
- Table 4. Динаміка розвитку ОПК України (2021–2025)
- Table 5. Характеристика ВПО як потенційної цільової групи ОПК (2025)
- Table 6. Прогнозна чисельність ветеранів та членів їхніх родин
- Table 7. Державні програми соціальної підтримки ВПО (2025)
- Table 8. Аналіз прогалин системи соціального забезпечення в екосистемі ОПК
- Table 9. Трирівнева архітектура екосистеми СП в системі ОПК
- Table 10. Матриця інтересів зацікавлених сторін екосистеми СП в ОПК
- Table 11. Інституційні умови функціонування екосистеми СП в ОПК
- Таблиця 12. Індикатори зрілості екосистеми СП в ОПК
- Table 13. Критерії оцінки ефективності екосистеми СП в ОПК
-
- Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O’Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49, 1-10.
- Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: An exploratory study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260-282.
- Apostrophe. (2025). Pereselentsi v Ukraini: de prozhyvaie naibilshe VPO [Internally displaced persons in Ukraine: Where the largest number of IDPs reside]. Apostrophe. (In Ukrainian).
- Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1-22.
- Bacq, S., & Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(5-6), 373-403.
- Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440.
- Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing – Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397-441.
- Bloom, P. N., & Chatterji, A. K. (2009). Scaling social entrepreneurial impact. California Management Review, 51(3), 114-133.
- Bondarevska, K. (2025). Social entrepreneurship as a direction for the development of entrepreneurial initiatives by war veterans in Ukraine. Management and Business, 3(1), 19-27.
- Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (Eds.). (2001). The emergence of social enterprise. Routledge.
- Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363-376.
- Cohen, B. (2005). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1-14.
- Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213.
- Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of «social entrepreneurship». The Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership / Duke University.
- Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53.
- Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417-436.
- Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81-100.
- European Commission (EC). (2020). Social enterprises and their ecosystems in Europe: Comparative synthesis report. Publications Office of the European Union.
- European Commission (EC). (2021). Building an economy that works for people: An action plan for the social economy (COM (2021) 778 final).
- Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. John Wiley & Sons.
- Forbes Ukraine. (2026). Potentsial – do $50 mlrd. Za try roky investytsii v ukrainskyi defence tech zrosly na 360%. Shcho u fokusi u 2026-mu? Doslidzhennia Rady zbroiariv [Potential – up to $50 billion. Investments in Ukrainian defense tech have increased by 360% in three years. What is in focus in 2026? Research by the Council of Arms Manufacturers]. Forbes Ukraine. (In Ukrainian).
- Forbes. (2025). Ukraine looks abroad for joint ventures to boost its defense industry (by Jacoby, T.). Forbes.
- Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., Vogus, T. J., & Miller, T. L. (2013). Studying the origins of social entrepreneurship: Compassion and the role of embedded agency. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 460-463.
- Gupta, P., Chauhan, S., Paul, J., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2020). Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 113, 209-229.
- Haugh, H. (2007). Community-led social venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(2), 161-182.
- IOM. (2024). Ukraine – Internal displacement report — General population survey, Round 18 (October 2024). International Organization for Migration.
- IOM. (2025). Ukraine — Internal displacement report — General population survey, Round 19. International Organization for Migration.
- Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. The Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project, Babson College.
- Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50.
- Kadroland. (2026). Zminy v poriadku broniuvannia pratsivnykiv krytychnykh pidpryiemstv [Changes in the procedure for booking employees of critical enterprises]. Kadroland. (In Ukrainian).
- Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas, 17, 246-262.
- Khmarochos. (2025). Tymchasove zhytlo dlia VPO: statystyka zapovnenosti [Temporary housing for IDPs: Occupancy statistics]. Khmarochos. (In Ukrainian).
- KMU. (2024). Rozporiadzhennia vid 29 Lystopada 2024 № 1209-r “Pro skhvalennia Stratehii veteranskoi polityky do 2030 roku” [Resolution of November 29, 2024 No. 1209-r “On approval of the Veteran Policy Strategy until 2030”]. Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy. (In Ukrainian).
- KMU. (2025a). Rozporiadzhennia vid 23 Zhovtnya 2025 № 1163-r “Pro skhvalennia Kontseptsii Derzhavnoi tsilovoi prohramy “Veteran. Robota” na 2026–2027 roky” [Resolution of October 23, 2025 No. 1163 “About the praise of the Concept of the State Target Program “Veteran.Robot” for 2026–2027”]. Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy. (In Ukrainian).
- KMU. (2025b). Rozporiadzhennia vid 26 Lystopada 2025 № 1343-r “Pro skhvalennia Kontseptsii Derzhavnoi tsilovoi prohramy z pidtrymky veteranskoho pidpryiemnytstva na 2026–2028 roky” [Resolution of November 26, 2025 No. 1343 “For the appreciation of the Concept of the State Military Program for the support of veterans’ enterprises on 2026–2028”]. Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy. (In Ukrainian).
- KMU. (2025c). Postanova vid 17 Hrudnia 2025 № 1745 “Deiaki pytannia pravovoho rezhymu Defens Siti” [Resolution of December 17, 2025 No. 1745 “Some issues of the legal regime of Defense City”]. (In Ukrainian).
- KMU. (2025d). Postanova vid 8 Hrudnia 2025 r. № 1608 “Deiaki pytannia broniuvannia viiskovozoboviazanykh na period mobilizatsii ta na voiennyi chas” [Resolution of December 8, 2025 No. 1608 “Some issues of booking conscripts for the period of mobilization and wartime”]. (In Ukrainian).
- Kuckertz, A., Bernhard, A., Berger, E. S. C., Dvouletý, O., Harms, R., Jack, S., & Kibler, E. (2023). Scaling the right answers – Creating and maintaining hope through social entrepreneurship in light of humanitarian crises. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 19, e00356.
- LB.ua. (2024). Pryvatni pidpryiemstva skladaiut ponad 80% pidpryiemstv oboronnoho sektoru [Private enterprises make up over 80% of defense sector enterprises]. LB.ua. (In Ukrainian).
- Lumpkin, G. T., & Bacq, S. (2019). Civic wealth creation: A new view of stakeholder engagement and societal impact. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(4), 383-404.
- Lumpkin, G. T., Bacq, S., & Pidduck, R. J. (2017). Where change happens: Community-level phenomena in social entrepreneurship research. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(1), 24-50.
- Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
- Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. OECD LEED Programme.
- Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. (2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616-640.
- Ministry of Veterans Affairs of Ukraine. (2024). 205 mil’yoniv hryven’ pidtrymuye veterans’kyy biznes vid Ukrayins’koho veterans’koho fondu Minveteraniv [Veteran business will receive 205 million hryvnias of support from the Ukrainian Veterans Fund of the Ministry of Veterans Affairs]. Ministry of Veterans Affairs of Ukraine. (In Ukrainian).
- Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.
- Moss, T. W., Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 805-830.
- MSP. (2025). Nova model suprovodu VPO [New IDP support model]. Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine. (In Ukrainian).
- Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 611-633.
- OECD/European Commission. (2017-2022). Better entrepreneurship policy tool: Social entrepreneurship. OECD Publishing.
- Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972-1001.
- PACT Ukraine. (2018). Ekosystema sotsialnoho pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini [Social entrepreneurship ecosystem in Ukraine]. PACT Ukraine. (In Ukrainian).
- Reznichenko, V. (2025). Zaluzhnyi sprohnozuvav, skilky veteraniv bude v Ukraini v razi peremyria [Zaluzhny predicted how many veterans there would be in Ukraine in the event of a truce]. Focus.ua. (In Ukrainian).
- Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2018). Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70-95.
- Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2020). A Call for Research on the Scaling of Organizations and the Scaling of Social Impact. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(2), 255-268.
- Skopych, D. (2025). Yakyi v Ukraini riven bezrobittia sered VPO: vidpovid MOM [What is the unemployment rate among IDPs in Ukraine: IOM response]. Bahmut IN.UA. (In Ukrainian).
- Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407-442.
- Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72.
- Spilling, O. R. (1996). The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 91-103.
- Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769.
- Stam, E., & van de Ven, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 56, 809-832.
- Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L., & Stride, C. (2015). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 308-331.
- Teasdale, S., Lyon, F., & Baldock, R. (2013). Playing with numbers: A methodological critique of the social enterprise growth myth. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 113-131.
- The Ukrainian Veterans Foundation. (2024). Rezultaty opytuvannia veteraniv shchodo pidpryiemnytskykh namiriv [Results of a survey of veterans on entrepreneurial intentions]. Ministerstvo u spravakh veteraniv Ukrainy. (In Ukrainian).
- USVF. (2026). The Ukrainian Veterans Foundation.
- Van de Ven, A. H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 211-230.
- Verbytska, A. (2024). Implementation of a participatory model of social entrepreneurship development as a tool for veteran and family reintegration at the community level. Pidpryiemnytstvo ta Innovatsii, 32, 39-43.
- Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2025a). Zakon Ukrainy No. 4563-IX “Pro veteranske pidpryiemnytstvo” [“On veteran entrepreneurship”]. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (In Ukrainian).
- Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2025b). Zakon Ukrainy No. 4577-IX “Pro vnesennia zmin do Podatkovoho kodeksu Ukrainy ta inshykh zakoniv Ukrainy shchodo pidtrymky pidpryiemstv oboronno-promyslovoho kompleksu [“On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Other Laws of Ukraine Regarding Support for Enterprises of the Defense Industrial Complex”]. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (In Ukrainian).
- Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2021). Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 729-778.
- Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519-532.
- Zalievska-Shyshak, A., & Shyshak, A. (2024). Social innovations and social entrepreneurship in the context of post-war recovery of Ukraine: Conceptualisation and legal aspects. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 7(3), 1-26.
- Zeyen, A., Beckmann, M., & Akhavan, R. (2014). Social entrepreneurship business models: Managing innovation for social and economic value creation. In C. von Müller & C. P. Zinth (Eds.), Managementperspektiven für die Zivilgesellschaft des 21. Jahrhunderts (pp. 107-132). Springer Gabler.


