Assessing the progressivity of the Ukrainian tax system
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.14(4).2025.07
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2025, Issue #4, pp. 94-107
- 8 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Understanding the pre-war structural progressivity of the Ukrainian tax system remains crucial for evaluating its distributional capacity and substantiating the ongoing debate on reintroducing a progressive tax scale in the post-war context. This study aims to assess the progressivity of the Ukrainian tax system. Estimation for 2014–2021 was conducted for the tax system as a whole and for each of the main taxes separately, and the lumped excise taxes, which accounted for 78% of total tax revenue in 2024. The Reynold-Smolensky index assessed the redistributive impact of the taxes in question (i.e., the degree by which they change the actual income inequality), while the Kakwani index was used to show the progressivity of their design (i.e., the impact of taxes on the direction and degree of disproportionality between income and tax burden). The most significant tax is VAT (Reynolds-Smolensky index: –2.54% in 2021), and it is the most regressive by design (Kakwani index: –8.51% in 2021). PIT is the only progressive tax (Kakwani index: 8.72% in 2021), and its redistributive impact is slightly lower than that of VAT (Reynolds-Smolensky index: 1.49%), which is insufficient to counter the latter’s regressive impact. As a result, the Ukrainian tax system is estimated to be mildly regressive, with moderately progressive PIT, moderately regressive VAT, and mildly regressive excises. VAT is encouraged to be left unchanged due to its key role in generating tax revenue. To increase tax progressivity, the reintroduction of a progressive PIT scale is recommended.
Acknowledgment
The paper was funded as part of the “Financial tools for reducing economic inequality in Ukraine” research project (No. 0124U002254), conducted at the State Organization “Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H22, H23, D31
-
References45
-
Tables1
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Structure of tax revenue in Ukraine in 2024, %
- Figure 2. Household money income and effective tax rates in Ukraine in 2021
- Figure 3. Structure of households’ monthly money income in 2014–2021, UAH
-
- Table 1. Tax system progressivity analysis
-
- Ajzenman, N., Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R., Tortarolo, D., & Vazquez-Bare, G. (2024). From flat to fair? The effects of a progressive tax reform (Working Paper No. 33286). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Alstadsæter, A., Johannesen, N., & Zucman, G. (2019). Tax evasion and inequality. American Economic Review, 109(6), 2073-2103.
- Auten, G., & Splinter, D. (2024). Income inequality in the United States: Using tax data to measure long-term trends. Journal of Political Economy, 132(7), 2179-2227.
- Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2006). The three goals of taxation. Tax Law Review, 60(1), 1-28.
- Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2009). Designing a federal VAT: Summary and recommendations (Olin Working Paper No. 09-013). University of Michigan Law & Economics, Social Science Research Network.
- Avi-Yonah, R.S. (2014). Taxation and inequality: A case for the VAT. Challenge, 57(3), 97-104.
- Braz, C., & Cunha, J. C. (2009). The redistributive effects of VAT in Portugal. Banco de Portugal Economic Bulletin, 72-86.
- Caminada, K., Goudswaard, K., Wang, C., & Wang, J. (2019). Has the redistributive effect of social transfers and taxes changed over time across countries? International Social Security Review, 72(1), 3-31.
- Davies, J., & Hoy, M. (2002). Flat rate taxes and inequality measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 84(1), 33-46.
- Diamond, P., & Saez, E. (2011). The case for a progressive tax: From basic research to policy recommendations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 165-190.
- Duncan, D., & Peter, K. S. (2016). Unequal inequalities: Do progressive taxes reduce income inequality? International Tax and Public Finance, 23(4), 762-783.
- European Commission (EC). (n.d.). Redistribution – Progressivity and level – EUROMOD estimates.
- Eydam, U., & Qualo, H. (2024). Income inequality and taxes – An empirical assessment. Applied Economics Letters, 31(18), 1828-1835.
- Feldstein, M., & Wrobel, M. (1998). Can state taxes redistribute income? Journal of Public Economics, 68(3), 369-396.
- Gerber, C., Klemm, A., Liu, L., & Mylonas, V. (2020). Income tax progressivity: Trends and implications. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(2), 365-386.
- Heathcote, J., Storesletten, K., & Violante, G. L. (2017). Optimal tax progressivity: An analytical framework. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1693-1754.
- Li, W., & Sarte, P.-D. (2004). Progressive taxation and long-run growth. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1705-1716.
- Lustig, N. (2017). Fiscal policy, inequality and the poor in the developing world (CEQ Working Paper No. 23). Commitment to Equity Institute, Tulane University.
- Mahler, V., & Jesuit, D. (2018). Indirect taxes and government inequality reduction: A cross-national analysis of the developed world. Journal of Income Distribution, 27(2), 1-26.
- Malikov, A., & Alimov, B. (2022). Income inequality and political instability. In 37th IARIW General Conference 2022. Luxembourg.
- Mantovani, D. (2018). Comparing redistributive efficiency of tax-benefit systems in Europe (Euromod Working Paper No. EM 12/18). University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.
- Markina, O. (2022). Taxation, inequality, and poverty: Evidence from Ukraine. Central European Economic Journal, 9(56), 1-18.
- Mian, R., Kadir, S. B., & Corrêa, D. S. (2025). Impact of tax progressivity on regional income inequalities: A comparative analysis between Brazil and Germany. Revista de Economia Política, 45(2).
- Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (2024). National revenue strategy until 2030.
- National Bank of Ukraine (NBU). (n.d.). Consolidated budget of Ukraine.
- Nosrati, E. (2025). The political economy of optimal taxation. Sociological Science, 12, 634-669.
- OECD. (2025a). Tax policy reforms 2025: OECD and selected partner economies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2025b). Taxing wages 2025: Decomposition of personal income taxes and the role of tax reliefs. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Oishi, S., Kushlev, K., & Schimmack, U. (2018). Progressive taxation, income inequality, and happiness. American Psychologist, 73(2), 157-168.
- Rubolino, E., & Waldenström, D. (2020). Tax progressivity and top incomes: Evidence from tax reforms. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 18(3), 261-289.
- Sarin, N., Summers, L., & Kupferberg, J. (2020, January 28). Tax reform for progressivity: A pragmatic approach. The Hamilton Project.
- Shapoval, Yu., Kerimov, P., Shpanel-Yukhta, O., Korablin, S., Bublyk, Ye., & Brus, S. (2022). Financial depth-economic growth nexus in Ukraine. Kharkiv: РС Тесhnology Сеntеr.
- Skalamera-Alilovic, D., & Rubinic, I. (2016). The tax system as a generator of economic inequality in Croatia. In 16th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development – The Legal Challenges of Modern World (pp. 459-476). Split.
- Slemrod, J., & Bakija, J. (2000). Does growing inequality reduce tax progressivity? Should it? (NBER Working Paper No. 7576). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Slemrod, J., & Velayudhan, T. (2022). The VAT at 100: A retrospective survey and agenda for future research. Public Finance Review, 50(1), 4-32.
- State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2022). Vytraty i resursy domohospodarstv Ukrainy [Household expenditures and resources of Ukraine]. (In Ukrainian).
- State web portal of budget for citizens. (n.d.). Budget execution.
- Stiglitz, J. (2016). Inequality and economic growth. The Political Quarterly, 86(S1), 134-155.
- Stroup, M. D., & Hubbard, K. (2013). An improved index and estimation method for assessing tax progressivity (Working Paper No. 13-14). Mercatus Center at George Mason University.
- Tarroux, B. (2019). The value of tax progressivity: Evidence from survey experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 179, Article 104068.
- Thomas, A. (2020). Reassessing the regressivity of the VAT (Taxation Working Papers No. 49). OECD.
- Thompson, F., Beatty, K., & Thompson, J. C. (2013). Ranking state tax systems: Progressivity, adequacy, efficiency. State Tax Notes, 141(7).
- Troiano, U. (2017). Do taxes increase economic inequality? A comparative study based on the state personal income tax (Working Paper No. 24175). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Vellutini, C., & Benitez, J. C. (2021). Measuring the redistributive capacity of tax policies (IMF Working Paper No. WP/21/252). International Monetary Fund.
- Wiśniewska-Kuźma, M. (2025). Does tax progressivity affect personal income tax revenue? An empirical analysis of the European Union countries. Optimum. Economic Studies, 2(120), 112-141.


