Abdulhadi Ramadan

Acceptance and implementation of international financial reporting standards ensure a wider scope for financial transparency, accountability, and comparability on a global scale. Against this backdrop, this study looks at the implications of these standards on Hungary’s financial transparency by evaluating panel data from 716 private companies over the period 2013–2023. The Hausman test results suggest that Fixed and Random Effects models should be used.
The analysis indicates that, on average, the sampled companies have improved financial transparency by 75%. Key determinants include standard adoption (0.025 coefficient, t = 8.333, p < 0.001), cost of implementation (2.400 coefficient, t = 24.000, p < 0.001), investor confidence (0.035 coefficient, t = 11.667, p < 0.001), and legislative changes (2.450 coefficient, t = 24.500, p < 0.001). Moreover, it is possible to obtain significant positive effects on the centered variables for implementation costs (coefficient = 2.498, p < 0.001) and government efficiency (coefficient = 0.036, p < 0.001).
These results demonstrate a positive effect, which is significantly created by adopting these standards on financial transparency. They underline increased investor confidence and government efficiency as drivers of these improvements. Applying these standards in Hungary’s financial reporting system is classified as a strategic tool to foster economic stability and attract foreign investment, which ensures Hungary’s good standing in the global economy.

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
The emergence of Islamic finance has positioned Sukuk as a moral substitute for traditional bonds. However, misalignment with International Financial Reporting Standard 9, especially in Jordan, erodes investor confidence and reduces integration into world markets. This paper attempts to quantitatively evaluate how classification difficulties under International Financial Reporting Standard 9 affect investment strategies, decision-making, and market attractiveness of Sukuk within Jordan’s financial system.
Data were collected from a stratified sample of 346 finance professionals from banks, investment businesses, insurance companies, and regulatory authorities. Each participant had at least three years of work experience and suitable academic credentials. Utilizing partial least squares structural equation modeling, the survey was carried out between September 2024 and January 2025. The results indicate that classification issues have a significant adverse effect, reducing investment strategy efficacy by 46% (β = –0.46, p < 0.01), decision-making clarity by 37% (β = –0.37, p < 0.05), and Sukuk attractiveness by 52% (β = –0.52, p < 0.001). These significant effects are reinforced by vigorous diagnostics of the model, with variance inflation factor measures between 1.15 and 1.23, and by superb fit indices of the model, such as a standardized root mean square residual of 0.06 and a comparative fit index of 0.95.
The results underline the need for a coordinated international classification system and the structural influence of regulatory inconsistencies on Sukuk viability. Promoting openness, restoring investor confidence, and enabling wider acceptance in foreign markets all depend on aligning Islamic financial instruments with global reporting standards.