Erwin Saraswati

The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a meta-analysis of the relationship between determinant factors and tax evasion based on deterrence approach. Using the meta-analysis method, each statistical result of empirical studies is converted into r-pearson as standardized effect size, and then synthesized into a mean effect size in order to increase power and to resolve uncertainty. Theoretically, increasing audit, tax rate and tax penalty will decrease tax evasion. However, the results show that only tax rate has a significant impact on tax evasion. Synthesizing totally 478 outcomes from articles published between 1978 and 2018, there is a robust conclusion that decreasing tax rate is an effective tool in combating tax evasion. On the other hand, audit and penalty are not significant in influencing tax evasion. In addition, the results of heterogeneity analysis suggest that national culture and income level of the country are useful in explaining the impact of audit, tax rate and tax penalty on tax evasion. These findings should be of interest to policymakers. First, instead of sacrificing more resources in conducting audit or imposing more penalty, tax authorities should consider setting the tax rate as low as possible to diminish tax evasion. Second, considering that culture and income level influence the impact of audit and penalty on tax evasion, policymakers should consider national cultural values and income level condition when designing audit techniques and setting penalty structures.

The emergence of sustainable business practices has garnered interest among stakeholders. However, the question of whether sustainability performance provides companies with a competitive advantage is still being debated in the literature. This paper aims to examine the influence of sustainability performance – namely economic sustainability performance and environmental, social, governance (ESG) – on competitive advantage, with the effectiveness of enterprise risk management (ERM) as the moderating variable. This paper used 202 firm-year observations during 2015–2022 from non-financial sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. To test the hypotheses, panel data regression with a one-year time-lag analysis is conducted. The findings show that economic sustainability performance has no relationship with competitive advantage, while ESG has a positive effect. Furthermore, ERM effectiveness strengthens the effect of economic sustainability and ESG on competitive advantage. Further investigation used a two-year time-lag analysis for a long-term perspective. The analysis shows that economic sustainability performance and ESG have a positive impact on competitive advantage. In contrast, ERM effectiveness has no effect on the relationship between economic sustainability performance and competitive advantage. Moreover, additional analysis incorporates the effect of COVID-19 into the main model and shows that the pandemic did not affect competitive advantage; this is consistent with the main results. The findings encourage companies to improve their risk management and sustainability initiatives. The government may also take it into account when developing rules that promote the implementation of sustainable development.

Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia through the Center for Higher Education Fund (BPPT) and Indonesia Endowment Funds for Education (LPDP) for providing the Indonesian Education Scholarship (BPI-Beasiswa Pendidikan Indonesia).

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
This study investigates the impact of greenwashing in ESG disclosure on firms’ ability to create shared value (CSV) by focusing on the mediating roles of disclosure quality and information asymmetry across different institutional contexts. The analysis is based on 391 firm-year observations of non-financial companies listed in Indonesia (277) and Malaysia (114) from 2018 to 2023, based on annual reports, sustainability disclosures, and Refinitiv ESG data. Random-effects panel regressions and bootstrapped mediation tests were used to evaluate direct and indirect effects. The results showed that greenwashing does not exert a significant direct influence on CSV in either country. However, in Malaysia, greenwashing significantly reduces information quality, which, in turn, undermines shared-value creation (indirect effect is significant). In Indonesia, although greenwashing negatively affects information quality, the subsequent link between disclosure quality and CSV is insignificant, resulting in no mediation effect. ESG disclosure quality, as a proxy for information asymmetry, does not mediate the greenwashing–CSV relationship in either country. These findings highlight the cross-country differences shaped by institutional environments: stronger regulatory oversight and stakeholder scrutiny in Malaysia amplify the mediating role of disclosure credibility, whereas weaker governance in Indonesia attenuates its relevance. This study contributes to the sustainability accounting literature by integrating symbolic compliance theory with the CSV framework and provides evidence that the credibility of ESG information is a critical determinant of value creation in emerging economies.

Acknowledgment
We express our gratitude to the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia, and the Faculty of Business and Economics, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia, for supporting this research collaboration.