Does innovation efficiency affect financial performance? The role of ownership concentration
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(1).2023.06
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2023, Issue #1, pp. 58-67
- Cited by
- 915 Views
-
348 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The company that is synonymous with the application of science and technology is the manufacturing industry (Krmela et al., 2022). Manufacturing companies in Indonesia have been accustomed to the use of technology in their production activities so far, because technology really helps the company’s production to be more effective (Muchran, 2020). This study examines the effect of innovation efficiency on firm performance and the moderating role of ownership concentration on this effect. This study examines innovation efficiency as the optimal combination of innovation input and innovation output. The inputs used are research and development expenses, machine repair expenses, and information technology purchases. Meanwhile, the output of innovation. This study used 616 annual reports of manufacturing companies from 2013 to 2018. The analytical technique used is a moderated regression analysis. The results show that efficiency is positively and significantly correlated with company performance. In addition, the results of the study provide evidence of concentrated ownership, encouraging managers to be more intensive in carrying out innovation efficiency so that it affects increasing company performance. These findings show that there is efficiency in innovation projects that can improve company performance, and companies with concentrated ownership find it easier to carry out innovation efficiency because of the active involvement of shareholders in the management process when innovation projects are implemented aimed at improving company performance.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F63, L16, M11, M21, O11
-
References44
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
-
- Table 1. Definition and measurement of research variables
- Table 2. Manufacturing companies that carry out product efficiency for the period 2013–2019
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Hypothesis testing
-
- Adomah Worae, T., & Ngwakwe, C. (2017). Environmental responsibility and financial performance nexus in South Africa: panel Granger causality analysis. Environmental Economics, 8(3), 29-34.
- Agostini, L., Nosella, A., & Filippini, R. (2017). Does intellectual capital allow improving innovation performance? A quantitative analysis in the SME context. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), 400-418.
- Aguilera, R. V., & Crespi-Cladera, R. (2016). Global corporate governance: On the relevance of firms’ ownership structure. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 50-57.
- Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021). Business strategy : The influence of Strategic Competitiveness on competitive advantage, 6(2), 1-10.
- Almulhim, A. F. (2020). Linking knowledge sharing to innovative work behaviour: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 549-560.
- Belloc, F. (2012). Corporate governance and innovation: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(5), 835-864.
- Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, January.
- Chen, D. C., & Chen, T. W. (2021). Research on sustainable management strategies for the machine tool industry during the covid-19 pandemic in Taiwan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(23).
- Chen, M. A., Wu, Q., & Yang, B. (2019). How Valuable Is FinTech Innovation? Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 2062-2106.
- Cruz-Cázares, C., Bayona-Sáez, C., & García-Marco, T. (2013). You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: Technological innovation efficiency. Research Policy, 42(6-7), 1239-1250.
- De, D., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., & Ghosh, S. K. (2020). Impact of Lean and Sustainability Oriented Innovation on Sustainability Performance of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: A Data Envelopment Analysis-based framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 219.
- Dilla, W., Janvrin, D., Perkins, J., & Raschke, R. (2019). Do environmental responsibility views influence investors’ use of environmental performance and assurance information? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(3), 476-497.
- Erkan, T. E., Lawson, B., Samson, D., Sullivan, P. H., Łataś, R., Walasek, D., Ogston, S. A., Lemeshow, S., Hosmer, D. W., Klar, J., Lwanga, S. K., Rotich, K. J., Schiuma, G., Lerro, A., Suseno, N. S., Hermina, T., Ramdhani, A., Utari, L., Wang, D., … & Nasih, M. (2019). Analisis Model Pengukuran Human Capital dalam Organisasi. Etikonomi, 3(1), 1-10.
- Eroglu, C., & Sanders, N. R. (2021). Effects of personality on the efficacy of judgmental adjustments of statistical forecasts. Management Decision.
- Exposito, A., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2018). Innovation and business performance for Spanish SMEs: New evidence from a multi-dimensional approach. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 36(8), 911-931.
- Grabowska, S., & Saniuk, S. (2022). Assessment of the Competitiveness and Effectiveness of an Open Business Model in the Industry 4.0 Environment. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1).
- Hang, M., Geyer-Klingeberg, J., Rathgeber, A. W., & Stöckl, S. (2018). Measurement matters – A meta-study of the determinants of corporate capital structure. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 68(April), 211-225.
- Haryati, R., Yasri, Y., Aimon, H., & Darwin, M. (2021). Development of Small, Micro Enterprises Based (smes) on Innovation and Environmental Sustainable Development in West Sumatera. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 25(4), 1-13.
- Jaya, I. M. L. M. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif: Teori, Penerapan, dan Riset Nyata. Anak Hebat Indonesia.
- Jaya, I. M. L. M. & Narsa, I. M. (2020). The Beauty and the Beast of Earning Management in Indonesia. Opcion, 36(91), 1097-1140.
- Jensen, C. A. (2021). The staged competition innovation theory. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3).
- Khan, S. A. R., Ponce, P., Tanveer, M., Aguirre-Padilla, N., Mahmood, H., & Shah, S. A. A. (2021). Technological innovation and circular economy practices: Business strategies to mitigate the effects of COVID-19. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(15), 1-17.
- Krmela, A., Šimberová, I., & Babiča, V. (2022). Dynamics of Business Models in Industry-Wide Collaborative Networks for Circularity. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1).
- Kurniawati, A., Sunaryo, I., Wiratmadja, I. I., & Irianto, D. (2022). Sustainability-Oriented Open Innovation: A Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Perspective. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(2).
- Lestari, S. D., Leon, F. M., Widyastuti, S., & Brabo, N. A. (2020). Antecedents and Consequences of Innovation and Business Strategy on Performance and Competitive Advantage of SMEs, 7(6), 365-378.
- Lin, Y. C. (2017). Does r&D investment under corporate social responsibility increase firm performance? Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(1), 217-226.
- Ma, X., Ock, Y. S., Wu, F., & Zhang, Z. (2022). The Effect of Internal Control on Green Innovation: Corporate Environmental Investment as a Mediator. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3), 1-19.
- Muchran. (2020). Effect of intellectual capital on sustainable financial performance of Indonesian pharmaceutical firms with moderating role knowledge management. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(1), 203-212.
- Mustafa, A., Saeed, A., Awais, M., & Aziz, S. (2020). Board-Gender Diversity, Family Ownership, and Dividend Announcement: Evidence from Asian Emerging Economies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(4), 62.
- Muthuveloo, R., Shanmugam, N., & Teoh, A. P. (2017). The impact of tacit knowledge management on organizational performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(4), 192-201.
- Peñarroya-Farell, M., & Miralles, F. (2022). Business Model Adaptation to the COVID-19 Crisis: Strategic Response of the Spanish Cultural and Creative Firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1).
- Qiao, P. H., & Fung, A. (2016). How Does CEO Power Affect Innovation Efficiency? Chinese Economy, 49(4), 231-238.
- Ruiter, H., De Feijter, F., & Wagensveld, K. (2022). Management control and business model innovation in the context of a circular economy in the dutch construction industry. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1).
- Sanchez-Henriquez, F., & Pavez, I. (2021). The effect of open innovation on eco-innovation performance: The role of market knowledge sources. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7).
- Shehadeh, M., Alharasis, E. E., Haddad, H., & Hasan, E. F. (2022). The Impact of Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance on Capital Structure of Jordanian Industrial Companies. Wseas Transactions on Business and Economics, 19, 361-375.
- Tarigan, J., Hatane, S. E., Stacia, L., & Widjaja, D. C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility policies and value creation: Does corporate governance and profitability mediate that relationship? Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16(2), 270-280.
- Trinugroho, I., Pamungkas, P., Wiwoho, J., Damayanti, S. M., & Pramono, T. (2022). Adoption of digital technologies for micro and small business in Indonesia. Finance Research Letters, 45(March 2021), 102156.
- Türkeș, M. C., Stăncioiu, A. F., Băltescu, C. A., & Marinescu, R. C. (2021). Resilience innovations and the use of food order & delivery platforms by the romanian restaurants during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(7), 3218-3247.
- Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.
- Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286-300.
- Yan, M. R., Chi, H. L., Yang, J. Y., & Chien, K. M. (2019). Towards a city-based cultural ecosystem service innovation framework as improved public-private-partnership model-A case study of Kaohsiung Dome. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(4).
- Yin, M., & Sheng, L. (2019). Corporate governance, innovation input and corporate performance: Empirical research based on endogeneity and industry categories. Nankai Business Review International, 10(1), 120-137.
- Yuan, Y., Lu, L. Y., Tian, G., & Yu, Y. (2020). Business Strategy and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(2), 359-377.
- Zandi, G. R., Ghani, E. K., Lestari, R. M. E., & Maimunah, S. (2019). The impact of management accounting systems, eco-innovations and energy efficacy on firm’s environmental and economic performance. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(6), 394-400.