Does poor ESG performance still drive profitability? New evidence from Indonesia’s SRI-KEHATI listed firms
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(3).2025.02
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2025, Issue #3, pp. 14-26
- 54 Views
-
30 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study investigates the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes, as measured by Return on Assets (RoA), among publicly SRI-KEHATI listed firms in Indonesia. Utilizing panel data from 90 firm-year observations over six years, the analysis employs a Random Effects Model (REM) across three progressively expanded specifications. ESG performance is proxied by the Sustainalytics ESG Risk Score, with higher values indicating poorer ESG standing. The estimation reveals a consistently positive and statistically significant relationship between ESG risk and financial performance. In the baseline model, the coefficient for ESG is 0.598 with a p-value of 0.052. This effect strengthens in the second model (coefficient = 0.768, p-value = 0.010) and remains significant in the fully controlled model (coefficient = 0.724, p-value = 0.017). These results imply that firms with weaker ESG profiles may achieve higher profitability, particularly in emerging markets with lenient ESG enforcement. Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) also strongly and positively influences RoA (coefficient = 0.740, p-value = 0.002), underscoring the role of sectoral reinvestment capacity. The findings raise critical questions regarding the alignment between ESG efforts and financial incentives in transition economies. Policymakers are urged to consider stronger regulatory frameworks to realign ESG compliance with firm-level profitability. This study contributes to the literature by providing context-specific insights into the paradox of ESG and financial success in under-regulated markets.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M14, L25, G32, Q56, C23
-
References35
-
Tables5
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research framework
-
- Table 1. Summary of sample selection and sample firms
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics of data
- Table 3. Model selection test results
- Table 4. Effects of ESG performance on financial outcome: REM estimation
- Table 5. Classical assumption tests summary
-
- Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609.
- Athari, S. A., Saliba, C., Abboud, E., & El-Bayaa, N. (2024). Examining the quadratic impact of sovereign ESG practices on firms’ profitability: Insights from the financial industry in GCC countries. Sustainability, 16(7), 2783.
- Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(Supplement 2), S119-S127.
- Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2005). Financial and legal constraints to growth: Does firm size matter? The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 137-177.
- Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2001). Capital structures in developing countries. The Journal of Finance, 56(1), 87-130.
- Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
- Chava, S. (2014). Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management Science, 60(9), 2223-2247.
- Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
- El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
- Fatemi, A. M., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 182-192.
- Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794-1810.
- Grisales, E. A. D., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2019). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315-334.
- Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464-1479.
- Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271.
- Hermansyah, I. F., Anwar, A. I., Ulumuddin, I., Aksah, N. M., Jannah, R. T., Amaliah, N. R., & Arifin, A. H. (2025). ESG performance and corporate financial outcomes relationship: Dataset (Version 3) [Data set]. Zenodo.
- Inayah, R. F., & Fuadi, F. (2025). The influence of managerial and family ownership on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Indonesia. Hasanuddin Economics and Business Review, 8(3).
- Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). (2024). Annual reports and financial data.
- Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724.
- Kouser, R., Bano, T., Azeem, M., & Ul Hassan, M. (2012). Inter-relationship between profitability, growth and size: A case of non-financial companies from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 6(2), 405-419.
- Kung, F., & Rupp, N. G. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Recent developments. In P. Saona Hoffmann (Ed.), Firm value – Theory and empirical evidence (Chapter). IntechOpen.
- Lim, HJ., & Mali, D. (2024). Does Market Performance (Tobin’s Q) Have A Negative Effect On Credit Ratings? Evidence From South Korea. Asia-Pac Financ Markets, 31, 53-80.
- Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
- Morningstar Sustainalytics. (2024). ESG ratings.
- Nugroho, D. P. D., Hsu, Y., Hartauer, C., & Hartauer, A. (2024). Investigating the Interconnection between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Strategies: An Examination of the Influence on Consumer Behavior. Sustainability, 16(2), 614.
- Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
- Patterson, H., Belsley, D., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. (1981). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. Biometrics, 37(4), 862.
- Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421-1460.
- Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243.
- Shakil, M. H. (2021). Environmental, social, and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72, 102144.
- Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591-611.
- Sri-Kehati. (2021). Indeks SRI-KEHATI. Yayasan KEHATI.
- Wang, D., Peng, K., Tang, K., & Wu, Y. (2022). Does fintech development enhance corporate ESG performance? Evidence from an emerging market. Sustainability, 14(24), 16597.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2025). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-0-357-90016-1.
- Zhu, J., Li, R., Chen, Z., & Zhang, T. (2025). Does ownership structure influence the financial performance of Chinese listed companies? An analysis of ESG practices and accounting-based outcomes. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(2), 48.
- Zumente, I., & Bistrova, J. (2021). ESG importance for long-term shareholder value creation: Literature vs. practice. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 127.