How transformational leadership affects job performance among hospital employees: Does power distance matter?

  • 40 Views
  • 9 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

This study aims to examine the impact of transformational leadership on job performance, emphasizing the mediating roles of work engagement, work motivation, and organizational culture, as well as the moderating effect of power distance. A total of 500 survey questionnaires were distributed in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, with 341 valid responses analyzed using structural equation modeling (Smart-PLS). The findings indicate that transformational leadership has a small direct effect on job performance and work engagement but demonstrates a moderate impact on work motivation and a significant influence on organizational culture. Work engagement, work motivation, and organizational culture mediate the relationship between transformational leadership and job performance. Additionally, the results reveal that power distance moderates the effect of transformational leadership on work motivation but not on job performance, work engagement, and organizational culture. Employees with a high power distance tend to weaken the positive relationship between transformational leadership and work motivation, thereby reducing job performance. The study provides insights into leadership strategies in hierarchical healthcare environments of Vietnam.

Acknowledgment
This study was carried out within the framework of the doctoral thesis subject to Decision No. 2/QD-DHTD dated January 12, 2020, at Tay Do University, Vietnam.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Conceptual framework
    • Figure 2. Measurement model
    • Figure 3. Structural model
    • Table 1. Results of the pilot test
    • Table 2. Demographic characteristics
    • Table 3. Summary results of coefficients in the PLS-SEM model
    • Table 4. Discriminant validity (HTMT and Fornell–Larcker criterion)
    • Table 5. Direct path analysis
    • Table 6. Mediating path analysis
    • Table 7. Moderating path analysis
    • Table 8. Global fit measure (GoF) and Q² predict
    • Table A1. Constructs, indicators, and questionnaire Items
    • Conceptualization
      Lan Huynh Thi Xuan, Duy Dao Huan, My Nguyen Thi Dung, Han Pham Dinh
    • Data curation
      Lan Huynh Thi Xuan, My Nguyen Thi Dung, Han Pham Dinh
    • Formal Analysis
      Lan Huynh Thi Xuan, Duy Dao Huan, My Nguyen Thi Dung, Han Pham Dinh
    • Funding acquisition
      Lan Huynh Thi Xuan
    • Investigation
      Lan Huynh Thi Xuan, Duy Dao Huan, My Nguyen Thi Dung
    • Methodology
      Lan Huynh Thi Xuan, Duy Dao Huan, My Nguyen Thi Dung, Han Pham Dinh
    • Project administration
      Lan Huynh Thi Xuan, Duy Dao Huan, My Nguyen Thi Dung, Han Pham Dinh
    • Resources
      Lan Huynh Thi Xuan, Duy Dao Huan, Han Pham Dinh
    • Software
      Lan Huynh Thi Xuan, Han Pham Dinh
    • Validation
      Lan Huynh Thi Xuan, Duy Dao Huan, My Nguyen Thi Dung, Han Pham Dinh
    • Visualization
      Lan Huynh Thi Xuan, My Nguyen Thi Dung, Han Pham Dinh
    • Writing – original draft
      Lan Huynh Thi Xuan, Duy Dao Huan, Han Pham Dinh
    • Supervision
      Duy Dao Huan, My Nguyen Thi Dung, Han Pham Dinh
    • Writing – review & editing
      My Nguyen Thi Dung, Han Pham Dinh