Sustainable marketing strategies in the context of a globalized clothing and textile (C&T) sector in Zimbabwe

  • Received September 19, 2016;
    Accepted February 22, 2017;
    Published July 27, 2017
  • Author(s)
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2-1).2017.12
  • Article Info
    Volume 15 2017, Issue #2 (cont. 1), pp. 288-300
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    1 articles
  • 2069 Views
  • 785 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

This article provides a new perspective on sustainable marketing strategies in the context of a globalized clothing and textile (C&T) sector in Zimbabwe by linking two diverse streams of literature, namely, globalization and marketing strategy. A quantitative approach was adopted to obtain data from 127 respondents using a two-stage cluster sample. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) confirmed three of four hypothesized relationships, namely that integrated co-alliances, modern technology and national policy impact the sustainability of clothing and textile sector in Zimbabwe. The adoption of a standardized marketing strategy characterized by uniform application of the marketing mix elements with minor modifications will have a significant impact on the capacity of the C&T sector to withstand the adverse effects of globalization. The research extends the body of existing knowledge on marketing strategy in the context of globalization of Zimbabwe’s C&T sector, and argues empirically for a new approach to developing and implementing competitive marketing strategies. The research findings will enable companies in the C&T sector of a developing economy to craft competitive marketing strategies, which incorporate internal company capabilities and technology, and also recognize the role of national policy in the globalization discourse.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Structural equation model
    • Table 1. Goodness of fit for final structural equation model
    • Table 2. Summary of hypothesized relationships