Workplace agility, intrinsic motivation, and role congruence antecedents of innovative work behavior: Evidence from Saudi Arabian organizations
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(3).2023.36
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #3, pp. 448-459
- Cited by
- 398 Views
-
254 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study investigates the impact of workplace agility, intrinsic motivation, and role congruence on innovative work behavior in private and public organizations. This empirical study used a quantitative research method and collected data from 358 employees in Saudi Arabian organizations. The data were gathered through a questionnaire distributed to the sample via social media groups. For this purpose, four standardized and validated questionnaires were used to measure the variables of interest. Since all the fit indices have robust fit, the proposed model qualifies for conducting Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results revealed a significant positive relationship, at a remarkable 0.01 level, between all the examined variables and innovative work behavior. This suggests that workplace agility, intrinsic motivation, and role congruence are positively associated with employees’ tendency to engage in innovative work behavior. Moreover, the study’s findings supported the hypotheses formulated for the research. All t-values exceeded 1.96, indicating statistical significance for all proposed variables. Theoretically, the study contributes to enhancing the current dynamic knowledge of the variables that influence the work environment. Practically, this study offers guidance to employees on innovative work behavior.
Acknowledgment
This research is funded by Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University under project numbered PSAU/2023/1444.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D23, O15, O30
-
References67
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Initial model
- Figure 2. Measurement model
-
- Table 1. Demographics of the sample
- Table 2. Reliability measures
- Table 3. Convergent validity
- Table 4. Discriminant validity
- Table 5. Fit index
- Table 6. Structural equation modelling results
-
- Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2020). The impact of organisational justice on employee innovative work behaviour: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 117-129.
- Alanzi, A. A., Sulphey, M. M. & Jnaneswar, K. (2022). Can Knowledge of Administrative Law impact Constructive deviance and Task performance: Empirical Evidence from Saudi Arabia, Vision: Journal of Business Perspectives.
- Alavi, S., Abd. Wahab, D., Muhamad, N., & Arbab Shirani, B. (2014). Organic structure and organisational learning as the main antecedents of workforce agility. International Journal of Production Research, 52(21), 6273-6295.
- Al-Harbi, J. A., Alarifi, S., & Mosbah, A. (2019). Transformation leadership and creativity: Effects of employees psychological empowerment and intrinsic motivation. Personnel Review, 48(5), 1082-1099.
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
- Barclay, D. W., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309.
- Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. In Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung (pp. 51-54). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
- Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316.
- Bos-Nehles, A. C., & Veenendaal, A. A. (2019). Perceptions of HR practices and innovative work behavior: the moderating effect of an innovative climate. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(18), 2661-2683.
- Charbonnier-Voirin, A., El Akremi, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2010). A multilevel model of transformational leadership and adaptive performance and the moderating role of climate for innovation. Group & Organization Management, 35(6), 699-726.
- De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
- De Simone, L. D., & Popoff, F. (2000). Eco-Efficiency. The business link to sustainable development. MIT Press.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
- Deng, S., Zhu, H., Peng, R., & Pan, Y. (2021). Development and validation of a cognitive model-based novel questionnaire for measuring potential unsafe behaviors of construction workers. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 1-8.
- DeSimone, L. D., & Popoff, F. (2000). Eco-efficiency: the business link to sustainable development. MIT Press.
- DiLiello, T. C., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Maximizing organizational leadership capacity for the future. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 319-337.
- Dodds, R., Graci, S., Ko, S., & Walker, L. (2013). What drives environmental sustainability in the New Zealand wine industry? An examination of driving factors and practices. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 25(3), 164-184.
- Dodds, R., Holmes, M., & Novotny, M. (2022). Because I believe in it: examining intrinsic and extrinsic motivations for sustainability in festivals through self-determination theory. Tourism Recreation Research, 47(2), 111-129.
- Doeze Jager-van Vliet, S. B., Born, M. P., & van der Molen, H. T. (2019). Using a portfolio-based process to develop agility among employees. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(1), 39-60.
- Gable, G., Scott, J., & Davenport, T. (1998). Cooperative ERP life-cycle knowledge management. Proceedings of ACIS’98, 227-240.
- Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967-988.
- Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory. In Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory (pp. 3-17). Cham: Springer.
- Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
- Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.
- Jauch, L. R., Osborn, R. N., & Terpening, W. D. (1980). Goal congruence and employee orientations: The substitution effect. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 544-550.
- Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
- Khan, M. A., Ismail, F. B., Hussain, A., & Alghazali, B. (2020). The interplay of leadership styles, innovative work behavior, organizational culture, and organizational citizenship behavior. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824401989826.
- Klein, L., & Colauto, R. (2020). Perceptions of organizational justice in incentive contracts and their effect on congruence between personal and organizational goals. Review of Business Management, 22(3).
- Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
- Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656-669.
- Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
- Lenth, R. V. (2001). Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. The American Statistician, 55(3), 187-193.
- Li, Y. B., Zhang, G. Q., Wu, T. J., & Peng, C. L. (2020). Employee’s corporate social responsibility perception and sustained innovative behavior: Based on the psychological identity of employees. Sustainability, 12(20), 8604.
- McMackin, J., & Heffernan, M. (2021). Agile for HR: Fine in practice, but will it work in theory? Human Resource Management Review, 31(4), 100791.
- Melnik, G., & Maurer, F. (2006, June). Comparative analysis of job satisfaction in agile and non-agile software development teams. In International conference on extreme programming and agile processes in software engineering (pp. 32-42). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Momeni, A., Han, J., Montuschi, P., & Lombardi, F. (2014). Design and analysis of approximate compressors for multiplication. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 64(4), 984-994.
- Morrison, T. G., Morrison, M. A., & McCutcheon, J. M. (2017). Best practice recommendations for using structural equation modelling in psychological research. Psychology, 8(09), 1326.
- Olkkonen, R., & Saastamoinen, K. (2000). SPSS perusopas. Turun kauppakorkeakoulu.
- Plonka, F. E. (1997). Developing a lean and agile work force. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 7(1), 11-20.
- Ployhart, R. E., & Moliterno, T. P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 127-150.
- Podsakoff, N. P., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
- Pulakos, E. D., Kantrowitz, T., & Schneider, B. (2019). What leads to organizational agility: It’s not what you think. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 71(4), 305.
- Raes, F., & Williams, J. M. G. (2010). The relationship between mindfulness and uncontrollability of ruminative thinking. Mindfulness, 1(4), 199-203.
- Revutska, O., & Maršíková, K. (2021). Agile approach in human resource management: focus on generation Y.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publishing.
- Sandhya, S., & Sulphey, M. M. (2021). Influence of Empowerment, Psychological Contract and Employee engagement on Voluntary Turnover Intentions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(2), 325-349.
- Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453.
- Schuh, S. C., Zhang, X. A., Morgeson, F. P., Tian, P., & van Dick, R. (2018). Are you really doing good things in your boss’s eyes? Interactive effects of employee innovative work behavior and leader-member exchange on supervisory performance ratings. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 397-409.
- Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Van der Heijden, B. I., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67-77.
- Sherehiy, B. (2008). Relationships between agility strategy, work organization and workforce agility. University of Louisville.
- Sherehiy, B., & Karwowski, W. (2014). The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44(3), 466-473.
- Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., & Layer, J. K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(5), 445-460.
- Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703-714.
- Simon, M. K., & Goes, J. (2013). Dissertation and Scholarly Research: Recipe for Success. Seatle, W.A: Dissertations Success LLC.
- Siyal, S., Xin, C., Umrani, W. A., Fatima, S., & Pal, D. (2021). How Do Leaders Influence Innovation and Creativity in Employees? The Mediating Role of Intrinsic Motivation. Administration and Society, 53(9), 1337-1361.
- Smollan, R. K., & Morrison, R. L. (2019). Office design and organizational change: The influence of communication and organizational culture. Journal of Organizational Change Management.
- Sulphey, M. M. (2020). Construction and Validation of Workplace Identity Scale (WIS). Economics and Sociology, 13(2), 53-69.
- Tajfel, H. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
- Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591-620.
- Tseng, Y. H., & Lin, C. T. (2011). Enhancing enterprise agility by deploying agile drivers, capabilities and providers. Information Sciences, 181(17), 3693-3708.
- Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
- Vaughan, G. M., Tajfel, H., & Williams, J. (1981). Bias in reward allocation in an intergroup and an interpersonal context. Social Psychology Quarterly, 37-42.
- Veloso, A., Roque, H., Ferreira, A. T., & Gomes, J. (2021). Psychometric characteristics of an adapted measure of innovative behavior at work. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 23, 141-152.
- Wilson, J. Q. (2019). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. Hachette, UK.
- Youndt, M. A., & Snell, S. A. (2004). Human resource configurations, intellectual capital, and organizational performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 337-360.