Arbitration in Islamic banking: Exploring legal and practical implications for dispute resolution
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.20(2).2025.02
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2025, Issue #2, pp. 15-26
- 112 Views
-
25 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Dispute resolution in Islamic banking presents unique legal and procedural challenges due to the dual requirement of compliance with national laws and Islamic Sharia principles. This study aims to evaluate the legal and practical effectiveness of arbitration in resolving Islamic banking disputes, particularly in terms of efficiency, compliance with Sharia, and institutional trust. A qualitative approach was employed, based on semi-structured interviews with 12 domain experts, including Islamic banking professionals, arbitrators, legal advisors, and Sharia scholars, each with 10–25 years of experience in relevant fields.
The findings indicate that 83% of respondents (10 out of 12) believe arbitration is more efficient than litigation in Islamic banking disputes, particularly in terms of speed and confidentiality. 75% of participants identified the lack of codified Sharia-compliant arbitration frameworks as a major limitation to broader adoption. Meanwhile, 67% emphasized the absence of a unified Sharia Supervisory Board as a critical institutional gap affecting arbitration legitimacy. Furthermore, 58% of experts pointed to weak trust in arbitration outcomes among financial institutions as the key reason arbitration clauses are often excluded from contracts.
Despite these barriers, 92% of respondents agreed that arbitration has high potential to resolve Islamic banking disputes effectively if institutional and legislative reforms are implemented. The study recommends establishing standardized arbitration protocols, enhancing regulatory oversight, and developing Sharia-aligned legal infrastructure.
These insights contribute to the broader discourse on Islamic finance governance and offer practical recommendations for policymakers, arbitration centers, and financial institutions seeking to enhance dispute resolution mechanisms in line with Sharia principles.
Acknowledgment
The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at the University of Bisha for supporting this work through the Fast-Track Research Support Program.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, K12, K41
-
References20
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Summary of respondents’ characteristics
- Table 2. Interview questions used during discussions with bank officials
- Table 3. Overview of data collection and methodological components
- Table 4. Perceptions of arbitration among bank officials
- Table 5. Comparison of arbitration and judicial settlement
-
- Abu Bakr Ali, E. E. (2010). Arbitration in Islamic banking operations disputes in Libyan law, reality, and prospects. International Conference on Islamic Banking and Finance, 11. (In Arabian).
- Al-Awa, M. S. (2008). Studies in the Egyptian comparative arbitration law. Al-Mahalla Al-Kubra: Legal Books House. (In Arabian).
- Aldohni, A. K. (2019). Islamic finance disputes: To litigate or to arbitrate? Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 70(4), 567-589.
- Al-Shibli, F. S. (2018). Litigation or arbitration for resolving Islamic banking disputes. Arab Law Quarterly, 32(4), 413-431.
- Arifin, M. (2019). Features of law when muamalah arbitration in Islamic resolving disputes. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(10), 160-175.
- Blanke, G. (2018). Islamic finance and dispute resolution. Transnational Dispute Management, 5.
- Blanke, G. (2019a). Islamic banking and finance disputes: The case for semi-secular arbitration (Part 1). Arbitration Blog.
- Blanke, G. (2019b). Islamic banking and finance disputes: The case for semi-secular arbitration (Part 2). Arbitration Blog.
- Blanke, G. (2022). Semi-secular arbitration in Islamic banking and finance disputes: The proposal revisited. Transnational Dispute Management, 6.
- Cairo Court of Appeal Judgment. (2005). Appeal No. 116 of 121 BC Arbitration, session of April 27, 2005. Arab Arbitration Magazine, 10, 341.
- Carolyn, B. L., & Spoorenberg, F. (2013). The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the NYC: Recent developments.
- Hikmany, A., & Oseni, U. A. (2016). Dispute resolution in the Islamic banking industry of Tanzania: Learning from other jurisdictions. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 8(2), 206-221.
- Labanieh, M. F., Hussain, M. A., & Mahdzir, N. (2019). Arbitration as a mechanism to resolve Islamic banking disputes in Malaysia: Challenges and drawbacks. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 10(2), 19-44.
- Markom, R., & Yaakub, N. I. (2015). Litigation as dispute resolution mechanism in Islamic finance: Malaysian experience. European Journal of Law and Economics, 40(3), 565-584.
- Mohamed, A., Makhtar, M., Hamid, N., & Asari, K. (2015). Arbitration as a method of dispute settlement in Islamic banking and finance: A perspective from Malaysian governing law. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 23(S), 153-164.
- Oseni, U. A. (2009). Dispute resolution in Islamic banking and finance: Current trends and future perspectives. SSRN.
- Rayhan, A. R. (2010). Settlement of Islamic banking disputes through arbitration. International Conference on Islamic Banking and Finance, 13. (In Arabic).
- Saber, F. (2018). Litigation or arbitration for resolving Islamic banking disputes. Arab Law Quarterly, 32(4), 413-431.
- Wedan, B., & Bachoush, H. (2016). The role of regulatory and supervisory bodies in overseeing globally systemically important banks. Journal of Business Administration and Economic Studies, 2(2), 108-129. (In Arabian).
- Zegers, J.-B. (2014). Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Saudi Arabia. BCDR International Arbitration Review, 1(1), 69-83.