Assessing systemic risk in Morocco’s banking sector: Conditional value-at-risk approach
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.20(4).2025.16
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2025, Issue #4, pp. 199-214
- 8 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Systemic risk in the banking sector poses a major threat to financial stability, particularly in concentrated markets such as Morocco, where the failure of one institution may trigger widespread disruptions. Understanding the extent to which individual banks contribute to systemic risk and generate spillover effects is essential for sustaining financial system resilience. This study aims to assess the systemic risk contributions and spillover potential of six listed Moroccan banks, Attijariwafa Bank (ATW), Bank of Africa (BOA), Banque Marocaine pour le Commerce et l’Industrie (BCI), Banque Centrale Populaire (BCP), Crédit Immobilier et Hôtelier (CIH), and Crédit du Maroc (CDM), by applying the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CoVaR) methodology. The analysis uses daily return data covering the period from January 4, 2010 to January 10, 2025. Value-at-Risk (VaR) estimates at 99% and 95% confidence levels show that the three largest banks, ATW, BCP, and BOA, are the least individually risky banks under normal market conditions, suggesting greater stability. In contrast, the smallest banks, CDM, BCI, and CIH, exhibit higher individual risk exposure. CoVaR and ΔCoVaR (marginal CoVaR) results indicate that ATW, BCP, and BOA are the primary contributors to systemic risk, with a higher potential for spillover during times of distress, while the remaining banks are less systemically significant. These findings highlight the need for enhanced macroprudential oversight and regular stress testing for larger institutions, alongside improved internal risk controls for smaller banks. The study emphasizes the importance of data-driven regulatory strategies in mitigating systemic vulnerabilities and strengthening the long-term stability of Morocco’s banking sector.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G01, C21, G21, G18
-
References45
-
Tables5
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Graphical representations of the six banks and the banking index
- Figure 2. Value-at-Risk of the six Moroccan banks at (1 – α = 99%) and (1 – α = 95%)
- Figure 3. ΔCoVaR for the six banks at (1 – α = 99%) and (1 – α = 95%) confidence levels
-
- Table 1. Augmented Dickey-Fuller applied to the prices
- Table 2. Augmented Dickey-Fuller applied to the algebraic returns
- Table 3. Value-at-Risk VaR1–α (in %) at confidence levels (1 – α = 99%), 95%, 50%
- Table 4. CoVaR and ΔCoVaR at the (1 – α = 99%) confidence level
- Table 5. CoVaR and ΔCoVaR at the (1 – α = 95%) confidence level
-
- Abedifar, P., Giudici, P., & Hashem, S. Q. (2017). Heterogeneous market structure and systemic risk: Evidence from dual banking systems. Journal of Financial Stability, 33(C), 96-119.
- Adrian, T., & Brunnermeier, M. K. (2008). CoVaR (Staff Report No. 348). Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
- Adrian, T., & Brunnermeier, M. K. (2011). CoVaR (Working Paper No. 17454). NBER.
- Adrian, T., & Brunnermeier, M. K. (2016). CoVaR. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1705-1741.
- Anghelache, G. A., & Oanea, D.-C. (2014). Main Romanian commercial banks’ systemic risk during financial crisis: a CoVar approach. The Review of Finance and Banking, 6(2), 69-80.
- Arias, M., Mendoza, J. C., & Pérez-Reyna, D. (2011). Applying CoVaR to measure systemic market risk: the Colombian case. Proceedings of the IFC Conference on “Initiatives to address data gaps revealed by the financial crisis” (vol. 34, pp. 351-364). Bank for International Settlements.
- Banulescu-Radu, D., Hurlin, C., Leymarie, J., & Scaillet, O. (2020). Backtesting marginal expected shortfall and related systemic risk measures (Working Papers No. 134136). University of Geneva, Geneva School of Economics and Management.
- Banulescu-Radu, D., Hurlin, C., Leymarie, J., & Scaillet, O. (2021). Backtesting Marginal Expected Shortfall and Related Systemic Risk Measures. Management Science, 67(9), 5730-5754.
- Bianchi, M. L., & Sorrentino, A. M. (2020). Measuring CoVaR: An Empirical Comparison. Computational Economics, 55(2), 511-528.
- Bianchi, M. L., & Sorrentino, A. M. (2022). Exploring the Systemic Risk of Domestic Banks with ΔCoVaR and Elastic-Net. Journal of Financial Services Research, 62, 127-141.
- Borri, N., Caccavaio, M., Giorgio, G., & Sorrentino, A. M. (2012). Systemic Risk in the European Banking Sector (Working Paper No. 11). Arcelli Centre for Monetary and Financial Studies.
- Brownlees, C., Chabot, B., Ghysels, E., & Kurz, C. (2020). Back to the future: Backtesting systemic risk measures during historical bank runs and the great depression. Journal of Banking & Finance, 113(C).
- Chien-Chiang, L., Xiao, Q., & Zhang, X. (2025). Green credit and systemic risk: From the perspectives of policy and scale. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 77(C).
- Civan, Z., Gulhayat, G. S., & Ebru, C. A. (2020). Identifying the systemically important banks of Turkey with the CoVaR method. Helyon, 6(9), e04790.
- de Mendonça H. F., & da Silva R. B. (2018). Effect of banking and macroeconomic variables on systemic risk: An application of ΔCOVAR for an emerging economy. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 43(C), 141-157.
- Drakos, A. A., & Kouretas, G. P. (2015). Bank ownership, financial segments and the measurement of systemic risk: An application of CoVaR. International Review of Economics & Finance, 40(C), 127-140.
- Hanif, H., Naveed, M., & Ur Rehman M. (2019). Dynamic modeling of systemic risk and firm value: A case of Pakistan. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1651440.
- Hanif, H., Yousaf, I., Waheed, A., & Ullah, W. (2021). MES vs ∆CoVaR: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1938927.
- Huang, Q., de Haan, J., & Scholtens, B. (2015). Analyzing Systemic Risk in the Chinese Banking System (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 5513). CESifo.
- Jiang, H., & Zhang, J. (2020). Discovering Systemic Risks of China’s Listed Banks by CoVaR Approach in the Digital Economy Era. Mathematics, 8(2), 180.
- Jin-Ping, L., Lin, E. M. H., Lin, J. J., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Bank systemic risk and CEO overconfidence. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 54(C).
- Karas, M., & Szczepaniak, W. (2017). Measuring Systemic Risk with CoVaR Using a Stock Market Data Based Approach. In Jajuga, K., Orlowski, L. T., & Staehr, K. (Eds.), Contemporary Trends and Challenges in Finance (pp. 135-143). Cham: Springer.
- Karimalis, E. N., & Nomikos, N. K. (2018). Measuring systemic risk in the European banking sector: a copula CoVaR approach. The European Journal of Finance, 24(11), 944-975.
- Keilbar, G., & Wang, W. (2022). Modelling systemic risk using neural network quantile regression. Empirical Economics, 62(1), 93-118.
- Khiari, W., & Ben Sassi, S. (2019). On identifying the systemically important Tunisian banks: An empirical approach based on the △CoVaR Measures. Risks, 7(4), 1-15.
- Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50.
- Kurter, Z. O. (2022). How macroeconomic conditions affect systemic risk in the short and long-run? (The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) No. 1407). University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
- Kyoud, A., El Msiyah, C., Madkour, J., & Nouisser, O. (2024). Systemic risk spillover effects within the Moroccan banking industry. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1).
- Liu, X. (2017). Measuring systemic risk with regime switching in tails. Economic Modelling, 67(C), 55-72.
- Löffler, G., & Raupach, P. (2013). Robustness and informativeness of systemic risk measures (Discussion Papers 04/2013). Deutsche Bundesbank.
- López-Espinosa, G., Moreno, A., Rubia, A., & Valderrama, L. (2012). Short-term wholesale funding and systemic risk: A global CoVaR approach. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(12), 3150-3162.
- Louhichi, W., Saghi, N., Srour, Z., & Viviani, J.-L. (2022). The effect of liquidity creation on systemic risk: evidence from European banking sector. Post-Print hal-03775358. Annals of Operations Research, 334, 357-389.
- Luangaram, P., Sethapramote, Y., Thampanishvong, K., & Uddin, G. S. (2024). Climate risk and financial stability: A systemic risk perspective from Thailand (PIER Discussion Papers No. 224). Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
- Manguzvane, M., & Mwamba, J. W. M. (2017). Modelling Systemic Risk in the South African Banking Sector using CoVar (Working paper No. 709). School of Economics, University of Johannesburg.
- Muharam, H., & Erwin, E. (2017). Measuring Systemic Risk of Banking in Indonesia: Conditional Value at Risk Model Application. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 6(2), 301-318.
- Nechba, B. Z. (2021). Moroccan conventional banks’ contribution to systemic risk. International Journal of Business and Technology Studies and Research, 3(3).
- Raz, A. F. (2018). Risk and capital in Indonesian large banks. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 10(1), 165-184.
- Rivera-Escobar, O., Escobar, J. W., & Manotas, D. F. (2022). Measurement of Systemic Risk in the Colombian Banking Sector. Risks, 10(1), 22.
- Roengpitya, R., & Rungchaoenkitkul, P. (2010). Measuring systemic risk and financial linkages in the Thai banking system. Internal report Systemic Risk, Basel III, Financial Stability and Regulations 2011 Money policy Group, Bank of Thailand.
- Sengul, S., & Yilmaz, E. (2019). Measuring Systemic Risks in the Turkish Banking Sector. Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(5), 1071-1084.
- Wosser, M. J. (2017). What Drives Systemic Bank Risk in Europe: the balance sheet effect (Research Technical Papers No. 08/RT/17). Central Bank of Ireland.
- Yun, J., & Moon, H. (2014). Measuring Systemic Risk in the Korean Banking Sector via Dynamic Conditional Correlation Models. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 27, 94-114.
- Zakaria, F. (2015). Systemic Risk and Financial Contagion in Morocco: New Approaches of Quantification. In Kensinger, J. W. (Ed.), Overlaps of Private Sector with Public Sector around the Globe (pp. 141-171). Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Zhang P., Wang, Y., Zhao M., & Tzu-Yi Y. (2021). Measuring Systemic risk of China’s listed Banks. Studii Financiare (Financial Studies), 25(3), 6-28.
- Ziwei, Y., & Huang, F. (2025). The role of intelligent algorithms in systemic financial risk identification: An empirical study of Chinese banking sector. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(3), 552-567.


