Water-related sustainability reporting practices amongst South African mining and non-mining corporations
-
Received September 9, 2021;Accepted December 8, 2021;Published December 15, 2021
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.10
-
Article InfoVolume 12 2021, Issue #1, pp. 112-123
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by8 articlesJournal title: South African Journal of Business ManagementArticle title: Components of integrated thinking: Evidence from South African listed companiesDOI: 10.4102/SAJBM.v55i1.4080Volume: 55 / Issue: 1 / First page: / Year: 2024Contributors: Dusan EcimJournal title: Sustainable EnvironmentArticle title: What drives corporate water disclosure? The role of board composition in Brazil and IndiaDOI: 10.1080/27658511.2024.2426836Volume: 10 / Issue: 1 / First page: / Year: 2024Contributors: Alan Bandeira Pinheiro, Nágela Bianca Do Prado, Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de MoraesJournal title: Groundwater for Sustainable DevelopmentArticle title: Water neutrality: Concept, challenges, policies, and recommendationsDOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101306Volume: 26 / Issue: / First page: 101306 / Year: 2024Contributors: Rajneesh Kumar, Avinash Mishra, Manish Kumar GoyalJournal title:Article title:DOI:Volume: / Issue: / First page: / Year:Contributors:Journal title: Revista Catarinense da Ciência ContábilArticle title: Water AccountingDOI: 10.16930/2237-766220243469Volume: 23 / Issue: / First page: e3469 / Year: 2024Contributors: Sara Meurer, Hans Michael van BellenJournal title: Meditari Accountancy ResearchArticle title: Bioaccounting measurement of environmental assets: beyond environmental accountingDOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-09-2022-1796Volume: 32 / Issue: 6 / First page: 2001 / Year: 2024Contributors: Angelica Farfan-Lievano, Olga Ines Ceballos, Eutimio Mejia SotoJournal title: Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler DergisiArticle title: Madencilikte Su Yönetiminin Değerlendirilmesi: Standart Su Dengesi Tablosu ile GRI 303 ve MIWAF Temelinde Karşılaştırmalı Sürdürülebilirlik AnaliziDOI: 10.17494/ogusbd.1751269Volume: 26 / Issue: 3 / First page: 1379 / Year: 2025Contributors: Vedat Ekergil, Ezgi PolatJournal title: DYNAArticle title: Governance and participatory strategies in sustainable water management: a systematic analysisDOI: 10.15446/dyna.v92n239.121432Volume: 92 / Issue: 239 / First page: 72 / Year: 2025Contributors: Rossember Saldaña-Escorcia
- 1086 Views
-
548 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Globally, water resource management has emerged as an important research area and is acknowledged as a crucial factor in achieving sustainable development goals. Despite its significance, water-related sustainability disclosures regarding water and water-related risks among companies are alarmingly weak. Many companies are not effectively measuring, managing, and disclosing their water-related risks. Hence, this paper aims to analyze water-related reporting and disclosure requirements of a sample of ten South African mining and non-mining companies with a high water profile, listed on the JSE Socially Responsible Investment Index. The companies’ level of compliance on water disclosure was assessed based on their reporting in the integrated and or annual reports. The findings revealed that sampled five mining companies performed poorly in terms of disclosure across the frameworks of awareness, disclosure, management, and leadership. On the other hand, the selection of five non-mining companies grasped the severe effect of the water crisis on their businesses and performed better in all the framework categories. The average score for the selection of mining companies was 65% compared to the 93% for the non-mining companies. Stakeholders need to focus on water governance processes that require improvement to enable the stakeholders to make better decisions on water management; subsequently, this is an area that needs to be addressed in future research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q01, Q25, P47
-
References27
-
Tables1
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Water disclosure framework
-
- Amis, M., & Nel, D. (2011). Managing water risk: business response to the risk of climate change in South Africa – a synthesis (WWF Report). Cape Town: WWF South Africa.
- Askham, T. (2016). Water sustainability: measurement, management, engagement, and disclosure of selected water-intensive companies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (Master’s Thesis). University of South Africa, Pretoria.
- Ayoola, T., & Olasanmi, O. (2013). Business Case for Integrated Reporting in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Sector. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 7(1), 30-54.
- Baird, H. (2012). Water-related issues could threaten business models. Financial Management, 12.
- Barton, B. (2010). Murky waters? Corporate reporting on water risk: a benchmarking study of 100 companies. Boston, MA: Ceres.
- Blaine, S. (2013, April 17). Agriculture is putting South Africa in deep water. Business Live.
- Botha, M. (2015). An analysis of water-related sustainability disclosure of Socially Responsible Investment-indexed JSE-listed companies (Master’s Thesis). North-West University.
- Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). (2012). CDP Water disclosure South Africa Report 2011. WSP Environment & Energy South Africa.
- Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). (2014). CDP South Africa Water Report 2014. National Business Initiative.
- Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). (2015). CDP Global Climate Change Report 2015. At the tipping point? CDP Worldwide.
- Deloitte. (2012). Integrated Reporting – Navigating your way to a truly Integrated Report (2nd ed.). Johannesburg: Deloitte.
- Institute of Directors in South Africa (IODSA). (2009). King Code of Governance for South Africa 2009 (King III).
- International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM). (2019). Adapting to Changing Climate: Implications for the Mining and Metals Industry, Climate Change.
- Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). (2013). What is the Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) Index?
- King, M., & Lessidrenska, T. (2009). Transient caretakers: making life on earth sustainable. Johannesburg: Pan Macmillan.
- PwC. (2013). Natural Capital Accounting. The next big thing in sustainability?
- SABMiller, GIZ & WWF-UK. (2011). Water futures. Addressing shared water challenges through collective action.
- Sappi Nord America. (2015). Sappi group Sustainability report 2015.
- South Africa Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA). (2010). World’s three parallel crises call for adoption of Integrated Reporting. SAICA Media Release.
- Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). (2012). Homepage of SASB.
- Swilling, M., & Annecke, E. (2012). Just Transitions: Explorations of sustainability in an unfair world. Cape Town: UCT Press.
- Tiger Brands. (2015). Integrated Annual Report 2015.
- Von Bormann, T., & Gulati, M. (2014). The Food Energy Water Nexus: understanding South Africa’s most urgent sustainability challenge. South Africa: WWF-SA.
- Woolworths Holdings Limited. (2015). Farming for the future.
- World Wide Fund (WWF). (2013). Water stewardship: Perspectives on business risks and responses to water challenges.
- World Wide Fund South Africa (WWFSA). (2015). Integrated Annual Report.
- Yadava, R. N., & Sinha, B. (2016). Scoring Sustainability Reports Using GRI 2011 Guidelines for Assessing Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Leading Public and Private Indian Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 549–558.
-
-
Conceptualization
Nadia Latiff
-
Data curation
Nadia Latiff
-
Formal Analysis
Nadia Latiff
-
Funding acquisition
Nadia Latiff
-
Investigation
Nadia Latiff
-
Methodology
Nadia Latiff
-
Project administration
Nadia Latiff, Ferina Marimuthu
-
Visualization
Nadia Latiff, Ferina Marimuthu
-
Writing – original draft
Nadia Latiff, Ferina Marimuthu
-
Validation
Ferina Marimuthu
-
Writing – review & editing
Ferina Marimuthu
-
Conceptualization
-
ESG disclosure and financial performance: Empirical study of Vietnamese commercial banks
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024 Issue #1 pp. 208-220 Views: 8329 Downloads: 2644 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure becomes vital for banks to be transparent and accountable for their investments and lending decisions to shareholders, regulators, and society. The potential enhancement of shareholder value through ESG disclosure is still inconsistent. Empirical studies on the association between ESG disclosure and financial performance are mixed and limited in emerging economies. This study aims to examine whether ESG disclosure impacts the financial performance of 24 Vietnamese commercial banks in terms of return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and net interest margin (NIM). The study uses the feasible generalized least squares estimation method based on panel data from 2018 to 2022. The study employs content analysis on 12 themes related to environmental, social, and governance pillars to score policy disclosure based on the Fair Finance Guide Methodology. The results highlight the positive effects of ESG policy disclosure, individual environment disclosure (E), and individual governance disclosure (G) on bank financial performance. Notably, ESG, E, and G have the largest influence on ROE, with coefficients of 0.051, 0.036, and 0.027, respectively, at a 5% significance level. However, the study does not provide evidence of a statistically significant association between social disclosure and financial performance. These results provide empirical evidence for regulators and bank managers to shape ESG policies and practices aligning with international standards.
Acknowledgment
ESG disclosure score of 11 banks as primary data in this study is conducted under the project coordinated by the Fair Finance Vietnam coalition, as part of Fair Finance International. -
Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 19-35 Views: 5870 Downloads: 2169 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯCorporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting plays a key role in management control, particularly in light of the increased demand for non-financial reporting after the financial crisis of 2008–2009. This literature review evaluates 47 empirical studies that concentrate on the influence of several board composition variables on the quantity and quality of CSR reporting. The author briefly introduces the research framework that underpins current empirical studies in this field. This is followed by a discussion of the main variables of board composition: (1) committees (audit and CSR committees), (2) board independence, (3) board expertise, (4) CEO duality, (5) board diversity (gender and foreign diversity), (6) board activity, and (7) board size. The author, then, summarizes the key findings, discusses the limitations of the existing research and offers useful recommendations for researchers, firm practice and regulators.
-
Green product buying intentions among young consumers: extending the application of theory of planned behavior
Andhy Setyawan
,
Noermijati Noermijati
,
Sunaryo Sunaryo ,
Siti Aisjah
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.13
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 145-154 Views: 5034 Downloads: 1928 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis research reveals the factors explaining the purchase intention toward green products among young consumers. Young consumers are beginner consumers who are going to play an important role to take a responsibility in preserving the environment. Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is selected as the main theoretical framework in this research alongside some other variables (environmental concern, environmental knowledge, and willingness to pay), which are added in the research model to expand TPB application. Three hundred and twenty-six respondents were interviewed through a survey and the data are analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).
The findings illustrated that not every explanatory variable influenced the purchase intention toward green products among young consumers. Environmental concern and attitude did not influence the purchase intention toward green products among young consumers.

