Relationships between human development, economic growth, and environmental condition: The case of South Korea
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.16(2).2025.06
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2025, Issue #2, pp. 73-83
- 30 Views
-
7 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The study examines the long-term relationships between human development, economic growth, and environmental conditions in South Korea from 1996 to 2021. Understanding these interactions is crucial for shaping policies that balance economic progress, social well-being, and environmental sustainability. The analysis employs cointegration techniques, including the Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) and Canonical Cointegration Regression (CCR) methods, to estimate long-run relationships among GDP per capita, the Human Development Index (HDI), and carbon dioxide emissions per capita. Empirical findings confirm a stable long-term equilibrium between GDP and HDI, as demonstrated by significant Engle-Granger and Phillips-Ouliaris test statistics (p-values ≤ 0.0245). The results suggest that economic growth consistently enhances human development, while improvements in HDI contribute to sustained economic progress. The relationship between HDI and carbon emissions per capita, however, yields mixed evidence. The Engle-Granger test supports a long-term association (p-values ≤ 0.015), but the Phillips-Ouliaris test does not confirm cointegration (p-values ≥ 0.112). The covariance matrix test indicates that the negative relationship between HDI and carbon emissions per capita is stronger and more variable compared to the more stable inverse association between HDI and GDP per capita. Additionally, Granger causality analysis reveals a significant causal relationship between HDI and GDP per capita, supported by a Chi-square value of 20.627 and a p-value below 0.001. These findings highlight the complexity of integrating environmental considerations into development policies. South Korea’s experience underscores the necessity of a balanced policy framework that ensures sustainable economic growth while advancing human development and mitigating environmental impacts.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q56, O44, C32, I31, F43
-
References36
-
Tables8
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Time series trends of LGDPPC, HDI, and CO₂
- Figure 2. Scatter plot analysis of the relationships between HDI, GDPPC, and CO₂
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the variables
- Table 2. Unit root test
- Table 3. Covariance matrix analyses of HDI, LGDPPC, and CO₂
- Table 4. Cointegration test results for LGDPPC and HDI
- Table 5. Cointegration test results for CO₂ and HDI
- Table 6. VAR lag order selection
- Table 7. Granger causality test results
- Table 8. VAR diagnostic tests
-
- Acevedo, S. (2008). Measuring the impact of human capital on the economic growth of South Korea. Korea and the World Economy, 9(1), 113-139.
- Ahmed, Z., Asghar, M. M., Malik, M. N., & Nawaz, K. (2020). Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resources Policy, 67, Article 101677.
- Costantini, V., & Monni, S. (2008). Environment, human development and economic growth. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 867-880.
- Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.
- Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
- Fang, Z., & Chang, Y. (2016). Energy, human capital and economic growth in Asia Pacific countries – Evidence from a panel cointegration and causality analysis. Energy Economics, 56, 177-184.
- FocusEconomics (FE). (n.d.). Economic Growth in Korea.
- Gürlük, S. (2009). Economic growth, industrial pollution and human development in the Mediterranean Region. Ecological Economics, 68(8-9), 2327-2335.
- Han, J., Du, T., Zhang, C., & Qian, X. (2018). Correlation analysis of CO₂ emissions, material stocks and economic growth nexus: Evidence from Chinese provinces. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 395-406.
- Hasanov, R. I., & Safarli, A. J. (2023). New structural design for green supply chain management: The case of the aluminum industry. New Design Ideas, 7(2), 343-355.
- Hasanov, R. I., Giyasova, Z., Azizova, R., Huseynova, S., & Zemri, B. E. (2024). Long-term dynamics between human development and environmental sustainability: An empirical analysis of CO₂ emissions in Azerbaijan. Challenges in Sustainability, 12(4), 273-280.
- Henderson, K., & Loreau, M. (2023). A model of Sustainable Development Goals: Challenges and opportunities in promoting human well-being and environmental sustainability. Ecological Modelling, 475, Article 110164.
- Hitka, M., Kucharčíková, A., Štarchoň, P., Balážová, Ž., Lukáč, M., & Stacho, Z. (2019). Knowledge and human capital as sustainable competitive advantage in human resource management. Sustainability, 11(18), Article 4985.
- IEA. (n.d.). Countries & regions, Korea. How much CO₂ does Korea emit?
- Isozaki, N. (2019). Education, development, and politics in South Korea. In K. Tsunekawa & Y. Todo (Eds.), Emerging States at Crossroads (pp. 209-229). Singapore: Springer.
- Jeremic, V., Isljamovic, S., Petrovic, N., Radojecic, Z., Markovic, A., & Bulajic, M. (2011). Human development index and sustainability: What’s the correlation? Metalurgia International, 16(7), 86-90.
- Kim, U., & Kim, J. (2022). Economic development, sociocultural change and quality of life in Korea: Analysis of three generations growing up in colonial, industrial and digital age. Psychology and Developing Societies, 34(2), 200-239.
- Lee, J. W. (2005). Human capital and productivity for Korea’s sustained economic growth. Journal of Asian Economics, 16(4), 663-687.
- Lee, J. W. (2007). Economic growth and human development in the Republic of Korea, 1945–1992 (Occasional Paper No. 24).
- MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601-618.
- Maksymenko, S. V., & Rabbani, M. (2008). Economic reforms, human capital, and economic growth in India and South Korea: A cointegration analysis. SSRN.
- McNeill, D., & Ottersen, O. P. (2015). Global governance for health: How to motivate political change? Public Health, 129(7), 833-837.
- Osiobe, E. U. (2020). Human capital, capital stock formation, and economic growth: A panel granger causality analysis. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(2).
- Ozturk, S., & Suluk, S. (2020). The granger causality relationship between human development and economic growth: The case of Norway. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147–4478), 9(6), 143-153.
- Park, J. D. (2024). Why holistic human development is crucial for transformative development of nations: Insights from Korea. Review of Institution and Economics, 18(1), 17-44.
- Phillips, P. C. B., & Ouliaris, S. (1990). Asymptotic properties of residual based tests for cointegration. Econometrica, 58(1), 165-193.
- Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
- Reyes, G. E., & Useche, A. J. (2019). Competitiveness, economic growth and human development in Latin American and Caribbean countries 2006–2015: A performance and correlation analysis. Competitiveness Review, 29(2), 139-159.
- Rukiah, R. (2020). Analysis relationship of economic growth, fiscal policies and demographic to Islamic human development index in Indonesia: Granger causality approach. FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman, 6(1), 31-46.
- Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250.
- UNDP. (n.d.). Human Development Reports. Korea (Republic of).
- Ustabaş, A., & Ersin, Ö. Ö. (2016). The effects of R&D and high technology exports on economic growth: A comparative cointegration analysis for Turkey and South Korea. International Conference on Eurasian Economies (pp. 44-55).
- World Bank. (n.d.). Data. Korea, Rep.
- Worldometer. (n.d.). South Korea CO₂ Emissions.
- Zhang, Y., & Wu, Z. (2022). Environmental performance and human development for sustainability: Towards to a new Environmental Human Index. Science of the Total Environment, 838, Article 156491.
- Zhou, B., Li, N., Lu, D., & Xia, J. (2022). Correlation analysis between economic growth and environmental quality. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 41(1), 127-140.