Emotion-based insights into pro-environmental video campaigns: A study on waste sorting behavior in Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.16(2).2025.05
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2025, Issue #2, pp. 50-72
- 26 Views
-
6 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to examine how different types of pro-environmental video content (featuring humans versus AI-generated characters) influence household waste sorting attitudes and behaviors among Ukrainian residents. The research was conducted in two stages using a mixed-method approach. In the first stage, 102 individuals aged 18–45 watched two videos on waste sorting and completed an online questionnaire. Cluster and variance analyses were performed using Statistica software. In the second stage, 35 participants underwent a laboratory-based emotion analysis using iMotions software, heart rate monitors, and galvanic skin response sensors at the Behavioral Lab of Sumy State University (Ukraine) from May to July 2024. The results revealed that videos featuring real people were more effective in generating interest (average rating: 3.5 vs. 3.2) and emotional engagement, particularly joy and contempt, which were the most frequently expressed emotions. Cluster analysis identified four distinct respondent groups. Cluster 1 (39.2%) – primarily young women – responded positively to human-led videos but showed limited behavioral change. Cluster 2 (19.6%) – women aged 26–35 – reacted positively to both videos and were most willing to adopt waste sorting behavior. Cluster 3 (23.5%) – primarily men – showed moderate engagement and sorted waste occasionally. Cluster 4 (17.6%) – highly educated women – exhibited the least positive responses and were least likely to change their behavior. The emotion analysis confirmed that videos featuring real people elicited stronger emotional responses across all categories, whereas AI-generated videos prompted higher levels of anger but generally weaker engagement.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the Behavioral Laboratory at Sumy State University for providing the essential facilities and resources that enabled the successful completion of this research. Additionally, sincere appreciation is extended to all study participants for their valuable time, commitment, and contributions, which significantly enriched our understanding of consumer behavior related to waste management and the perception of advertising content.
The research is supported by the International Visegrad Fund: Visegrad Fellowship Program. Project № 62410031, “Marketing research consumer behaviour in the waste management system”, and by the budget of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (research topic 0123U100112 “Post-war recovery of the energy industry of Ukraine: Optimization of waste management taking into account the health of the population, environmental, investment, tax determinants”.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q56, M31, D91, C91, D83
-
References72
-
Tables5
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Real-time graph: Frame-by-frame analysis of emotional responses
- Figure 2. Average emotion time for all respondents (contempt and joy)
- Figure 3. Average percent of emotion time for all respondents (distress and anger)
-
- Table 1. Generalized survey results about the respondents’ attitude to the proposed videos about waste management approaches
- Table 2. Analysis of variance for 12 parameters
- Table 3. Average percent of each emotion time for two videos for all respondents
- Table B1. Emotion analysis table for all respondents (video 1)
- Table C1. Emotion analysis table for all respondents (video 2)
-
- Abid, U. b., Faisal, M. N., Al-Esmael, B., & Farooq, Z. H. (2024). Exploring the moderating role of technological competence and artificial intelligence in green HRM. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 7-22.
- Alfarizi, M., Lindiasari Samputra, P., & Isnaeni Dwi Arista, N. (2023). Role of entrepreneur’s perspective of waste management for coffee shop sustainability. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(4), 502-515.
- Alves, B. (2025, March 14). Household food waste generation in selected countries worldwide in 2022. Statista.
- Amin, M.B., & Oláh, J. (2024). Effects of green HRM practices on circular economy-based performance of banking organizations in an emerging nation. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(2), 75-87.
- Amrani, N., Sadik, M., Chnigri, Y., Hemmi, M., Slimani, H., & Skačkauskienė, I. (2022). Toward value creation in local authorities: The role of information and communication technologies. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 20(2), 358-388.
- Androniceanu, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence in administration and public management. Administratie si Management Public, 42, 99-114.
- Baker, D. H., Vilidaite, G., Lygo, F. A., Smith, A. K., Flack, T. R., Gouws, A. D., & Andrews, T. J. (2021). Power contours: optimising sample size and precision in experimental psychology and human neuroscience. Psychological Methods, 26(3), 295-314.
- Benchea, L., & Ilie, A. G. (2023). Preparing for a new world of work: Leadership styles reconfigured in the digital age. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 15(1), 135-143.
- Bian, X., & Wang, B. (2024). Exploring the influence of artificial intelligence usage on ethical decision making among public sector employees: Insights into moral identity and service motivation. Business Ethics and Leadership, 8(3), 133-150.
- Birzhanova, A., Nurgaliyeva, A., Nurmagambetova, A., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2024). Neuro quantum-inspired decision-making for investor perception in green and conventional bond investments. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21(1), 168-184.
- Bliumska-Danko, K., Charreire-Petit, S., Qu, D., & Shevchenko, T. (2022). Mapping organic packaging research: Environmental concern and health safety. Environmental Economics, 13(1), 155-170.
- Boutaleb, B. (2024). Factors influencing smart phone buying behaviour of consumers: Implications for building a marketing strategy. Business Ethics and Leadership, 8(3), 71-81.
- Chan, R. Y. K. (2004). Consumer responses to environmental advertising in China. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22(4), 427-437.
- Chygryn, O., Rosokhata, A., Rybina, O., & Stoyanets, N. (2021). Green competitiveness: The evolution of concept formation. E3S Web of Conferences, 234, Article 00004.
- Dobrovolska, O., & Kolomiiets, S. (2024). The impact of digitalisation on social ddeterminants of public health. Health Economics and Management Review, 5(3), 128-142.
- Dobrovolska, O., Ortmanns, W., Podosynnikov, S., Halynskyi, D., & Miniailo, A. (2024). Start-ups and entrepreneurship in renewable energy: Investments and risks. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 8(2), 213-240.
- Firstová, J., & Vysochyna, A. (2024). Optimisation of socio-economic, environmental and public health determinants of national security for post-pandemic recovery. Health Economics and Management Review, 5(1), 67-79.
- Fleck, A. (2024, April 8). The scale of food waste in Europe. Statista.
- Fu, Q., & Chang, C.-P. (2024). Cross-national sanctions and green innovation: Worldwide investigation. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(2), 435-469.
- Georgescu, I., Kinnunen, J., & Androniceanu, A.-M. (2022). Empirical evidence on circular economy and economic development in Europe: A panel approach. Journal of Business Economics & Management, 23(1), 199-217.
- Goodwin, B. C., Browne, M., & Rockloff, M. (2015). Measuring preference for supernormal over natural rewards: A two-dimensional anticipatory pleasure scale. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(4).
- Halynskyi, D., Lytiuha, Y., & Telizhenko, O. (2024). The impact of tax burden payment indicators and ease of tax compliance on the development of clean and digital energy startups. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 8(4), 204-225.
- Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. (2012). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1254-1263.
- Heinzova, R., Hoke, E., & Janova, N. (2024). Lean management methods: Evidence from the manufacturing industry in the Czech Republic. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(3), 517-527.
- Hermann, E., & Puntoni, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence and consumer behavior: From predictive to generative AI. Journal of Business Research, 180, Article 114720.
- Hornungová, J., & Petrová, K. (2023). The relationship between digital performance and production of greenhouse gas emissions in EU countries: Correlation analysis and ANOVA method. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 15(1), 21-33.
- Imashev, A., Turekulova, D., Mukhambetova, L., Niyazov, M., Saimagambetova, G., & Yerkulova, G. (2024). Strategic management of sustainable development of companies. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 20(3), 275-286.
- Jakubelskas, U., & Skvarciany, V. (2023). Circular economy practices as a tool for sustainable development in the context of renewable energy: What are the opportunities for the EU? Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(3), 833-859.
- Jurkowska-Gomułka, A., Kurczewska, K., & Bilan, Y. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in public administration. Case of Polish central administrative institutions. Administratie Si Management Public, 36, 116-133.
- Khomenko, L., Saher, L., Letunovska, N., & Jasnikowski, A. (2021). Segmentation as a base for digital marketing strategies in blood service: A cluster analysis for classifying healthy regional subjects. E3S Web of Conferences, 307, Article 03001.
- Kolupaieva, I., & Tiesheva, L. (2023). Asymmetry and convergence in the development of digital technologies in the EU countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 687-716.
- Kong, C., Khalid, H., & Gao, Z. (2023). Construction of agricultural product consumer group portrait and analysis of precision marketing strategies based on K-means cluster analysis. Journal of Autonomous Intelligence, 7(1).
- Kringelbach, M. L., & Berridge, K. C. (2010). The functional neuroanatomy of pleasure and happiness. Discovery Medicine, 9(49), 579-587.
- Lentner, C., Lencses, E., Hegedűs, S., & Nagy, V. (2024). Analysis of the crisis resilience of utilities in the ownership of municipalities in Hungary between 2006 and 2022. Public and Municipal Finance, 13(2), 182-194.
- Liu, Q., Xu, Q., Shen, X., Chen, B., & Esfahani, S.S. (2022). The mechanism of household waste sorting behaviour – A study of Jiaxing, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), Article 2447.
- Liu, S., & Liu, X. (2020). Culture and green advertising preference: A comparative and critical discursive analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.
- Liubchak, V. V., Khomenko, L. M., Kovalishyn, M. P., Ilyina, V. V., Smiianov, V. A., Sikora, V. V., & Babar, T. V. (2021). Medical and economic analysis of the choice of therapeutic plasmapheresis method to optimize the transfusion care quality. Wiadomości Lekarskie, 74(10), 2466-2470.
- Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
- Lyeonov, S., Rosokhata, A., Letunovska, N., & Khomenko, L. (2025, April 2). Two thematic videos (AI-generated and with real people) with information about the importance of waste sorting [Data set]. Zenodo.
- Makarenko, I., Steiner, B., & Yuhai, K. (2024). Toward a novel Sustainability Transparency Index for improved governance in agri-food value chains: A comparative study of Finnish and Ukrainian companies. Accounting and Financial Control, 5(1), 68-81.
- Małys, Ł. (2023). The approach to supply chain cooperation in the implementation of sustainable development initiatives and company’s economic performance. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(1), 255-286.
- Mwanaumo, E. M., Kilaka, S., Chisumbe, S., & Mwanaumo, E. T. (2024). Factors affecting effective participation of small and medium enterprises in public procurement. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 12(2), 17-37.
- Nguyen, L.-T., Dang, T.-Q., & Duc, D. T. V. (2024). The dark sides of AI advertising: The integration of cognitive appraisal theory and information quality theory. Social Science Computer Review, 43(2), 397-424.
- Oe, H., & Yamaoka, Y. (2023). Exploring socioeconomic factors for the sustainability of electric guitar brands: Focusing on traditional values and psychological attachment. SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(4), 36-53.
- Oe, H., & Yamaoka, Y. (2024). The role of citizen feedback in shaping social policies: Enhancing administrative processes and information transparency for inclusive governance. SocioEconomic Challenges, 8(3), 16-28.
- Omarova, A., Niyazov, M., Turekulova, A., Turekulova, D., Mukhambetova, L., & Mukhambetov, Y. (2024). Socio-economic development of youth policy in the context of digital transformation. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 20(1), 197-208.
- Onopriienko, K., Lovciová, K., Mateášová, M., Kuznyetsova, A., & Vasylieva, T. (2023). Economic policy to support lifelong learning system development & SDG4 achievement: Bibliometric analysis. Knowledge and Performance Management, 7(1), 15-28.
- Oualid, C., Selma, D., & Soufyane, B. (2024). The impact of content personalization on customer engagement and market risks of e-stores. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 8(3), 37-56.
- Pan, J, & Liu, P. (2024). Exploring waste separation using an extended theory of planned behavior: A comparison between adults and children. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1337969.
- Pekarskiene, I., Bruneckiene, J., & Sarlauskaite, S. (2023). State aid impact on Central and Eastern Europe economies. Engineering Economics, 34(2), 193-204.
- Poli, M., Malagas, K., Nomikos, S., Papapostolou, A., & Vlassas, G. (2023). An overview of the impact of the food sector “intelligent packaging” and “smart packaging”. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 15(1), 120-134.
- Potkány, M., Neykov, N., Streimikis, J., & Lesníková, P. (2024). Circular economy efficiency in the context of waste management in the selected Central and Eastern European countries – Evidence from DEA and fractional regression analysis. Economics & Sociology, 17(3), 175-195.
- Reynolds, C., Goucher, L., Quested, T., Bromley, S., Gillick, S., Wells, V. K., Evans, D., Koh, L., Carlsson Kanyama, A., Katzeff, C., Svenfelt, Å., & Jackson, P. (2019). Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions. Food Policy, 83, 7-27.
- Rozkwitalska, M., & Lis, A. M. (2022). Social learning in cluster organizations and accumulation of technological capability. Engineering Economics, 33(4), 372-385.
- Rui, L., Sineviciene, L., Melnyk, L., Kubatko, O., Karintseva, O., & Lyulyov, O. (2019). Economic and environmental convergence of transformation economy: The case of China. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 233-241.
- Saleh Al-Omoush, K., Lassala, C., Al-Debei, M.M., & Ribeiro-Navarrete, S. (2023). Social innovations during unprecedented crises: The roles of crowd wisdom, echo chambers, and social trust. Transformations in Business & Economics, 22(3A), 787-809.
- Samborskyi, O. (2017). Methodology of social research: Sampling and data analysis. National University of Pharmacy. (In Ukrainian).
- Skrynnyk, O., & Vasylieva, T. (2020). Neuro-genetic hybrid system for management of organizational development measures. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications. Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer (pp. 411-422). Kharkiv, Ukraine.
- Štreimikienė, D., Mikalauskienė, A., & Macijauskaitė-Daunaravičienė, U. (2022). Role of information management in implementing the Green Deal in the EU and the US. Journal of International Studies, 15(4), 9-27.
- Szigeti, S., & Jozsa, L. (2023). Obtaining consumer information for the purchase of over-the-counter medicines and food supplements from Hungarian-speaking adult consumers in Slovakia. Health Economics and Management Review, 4(1), 60-70.
- Szucs, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2020). Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals. NeuroImage, 221, Article 117164.
- Tielietov, O., & Letunovska, N. (2014). Organizational and economic mechanism of industrial enterprises social infrastructure management. Actual Problems of Economics, 160(1), 329-337.
- Tvaronavičienė, M., Mazur, N., Mishchuk, H., & Bilan, Y. (2021). Quality of life of the youth: Assessment methodology development and empirical study in human capital management. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 1088-1105.
- Vasilyeva, T., Samusevych, Y., Babenko, V., Bestuzheva, S., Bondarenko, S., & Nesterenko, I. (2023). Environmental taxation: Role in promotion of the pro-environmental behaviour. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 20, 410-427.
- Wenting, F., Yuelong, Z., Xianyun, S., & Chenling, L. (2022). Green advertising is more environmentally friendly? The influence of advertising color on consumers’ preferences for green products. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
- Yang, X., Shi, Z., & Li, C. (2024). Information disclosure and the peer effect of corporate technology innovation. Transformations in Business & Economics, 23(2), 554-583.
- Yarovenko, H., Kuzior, A., Norek, T., & Lopatka, A. (2024). The future of artificial intelligence: Fear, hope or indifference? Human Technology, 20(3), 611-639.
- Yurchyk, H., Mishchuk, H., & Bilan, Y. (2023). Government assistance programs for internally displaced persons: Assessing the impact on economic growth and labour market. Administratie si Management Public, 41, 201-218.
- Zamir, Z., & Kim, D. (2022). The effect of quality dimensions of information systems on knowledge sharing and user satisfaction. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 10(1), 1-19.
- Zhang, S., Luo, Y., & Zhang, P. (2024). A comparative study of factors influencing residents’ waste sorting behavior in urban and rural areas of China. Heliyon, 10(9), Article e30591.
- Zhghenti, T., & Kapanadze, L. (2024). Sustainable innovation in the digital age: Analysing the motivations of the young generation in joining the sharing economy. SocioEconomic Challenges, 8(2), 1-11.
- Zhidebekkyzy, A., Moldabekova, A., Amangeldiyeva, B., & Streimikis, J. (2022). Assessment of factors influencing pro-circular behaviour of a population. Economics & Sociology, 15(3), 202-215.