Assessing the effect of social commerce in shaping fashion purchase intent among working professionals
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.21(3).2025.06
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2025, Issue #3, pp. 75-91
- 12 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Retailers are leveraging social commerce by integrating advanced social media features to drive customer engagement and create superior value. Thus, a present study is an attempt to analyze the impact of perceived ease of use, user engagement and technological factors on social commerce usage and to assess its contribution towards the purchase intention of the working professionals. 380 working women (from organized sectors including education, industry, health, government, banking, and IT) were targeted from Bengaluru city of India by adopting the snowball sampling method which was further analyzed using independent sample t-test, regression analysis, and Structural Equation Modelling. The results of the study show the effects of perceived ease of use (β = .434), user engagement (β = .517), and technological factors (β = .662) on social commerce usage (SCU) are studied, which mediates purchase intention (β = .689). These results indicate that SCU is one of the main factors affecting purchase intention (β = .751). This also show that there is significant influence of perceived ease of use, user engagement, and technological factors on social commerce usage that has ultimately led to their purchase intention among working professionals. Based on these findings, it is crucial to perfect social commerce strategies in order to improve consumer’s engagement and encourage purchase behavior.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M31, O33, J44
-
References35
-
Tables5
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model of the study
- Figure 2. Mediating role of social commerce usage
- Figure 3. Overall tested model
-
- Table 1. Demographic profile of the respondents
- Table 2. Construct validity
- Table 3. The influence of perceived ease of use, user engagement and technological factors on social commerce usage
- Table 4. Mediating role of social commerce usage
- Table 5. Results from the tested model
-
- Ahmad Shukri, N. A. S., & Mustaffa, N. (2023). Exploring the Influences of Social Networking Service (SNS) on Consumer Purchase Behaviour. Al-i’lam - Journal of Contemporary Islamic Communication and Media, 3(1).
- Aizstrauta, D., Ginters, E., & Eroles, M.-A. P. (2015). Applying Theory of Diffusion of Innovations to Evaluate Technology Acceptance and Sustainability. Procedia Computer Science, 43, 69-77.
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2).
- Cho, E., & Son, J. (2019). The effect of social connectedness on consumer adoption of social commerce in apparel shopping. Fashion and Textiles, 6(1), 14.
- Chopra, A., Avhad, V., & Jaju, S. (2021). Influencer Marketing: An Exploratory Study to Identify Antecedents of Consumer Behavior of Millennial. Business Perspectives and Research, 9(1), 77-91.
- Davcik, N. S., Langaro, D., Jevons, C., & Nascimento, R. (2022). Non-sponsored brand-related user-generated content: effects and mechanisms of consumer engagement. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(1), 163-174.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.
- Dincer, C., & Dincer, B. (2023). Social Commerce and Purchase Intention: A Brief Look at the Last Decade by Bibliometrics. Sustainability, 15(1), 846.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 1-77.
- Hair, J. F. , B. W. C. , B. B. J. , & A. R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433.
- Hair Jr, F. J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, G. V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
- Hanafiah, M. H. (2020). Formative vs. reflective measurement model: Guidelines for structural equation modeling research. International Journal of Analysis and Applications, 18(5), 876-889.
- Herzallah, D., Muñoz Leiva, F., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2022). To buy or not to buy, that is the question: understanding the determinants of the urge to buy impulsively on Instagram Commerce. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(4), 477-493.
- Ho, C.-I., Chen, M.-C., & Shih, Y.-W. (2022). Customer engagement behaviours in a social media context revisited: using both the formative measurement model and text mining techniques. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(7-8), 740-770.
- Hu, S., & Zhu, Z. (2022). Effects of Social Media Usage on Consumers’ Purchase Intention in Social Commerce: A Cross-Cultural Empirical Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
- Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2017). The effects of social commerce design on consumer purchase decision-making: An empirical study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 25, 40-58.
- Jin, S. V., & Muqaddam, A. (2019). Product placement 2.0: “Do Brands Need Influencers, or Do Influencers Need Brands?” Journal of Brand Management, 26(5), 522-537.
- Kim, H. J., & Chan-Olmsted, S. (2022). Influencer Marketing and Social Commerce: Exploring the Role of Influencer Communities in Predicting Usage Intent. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 22(3), 249-268.
- Laitinen, K., & Sivunen, A. (2020). Enablers of and constraints on employees’ information sharing on enterprise social media. Information Technology & People, 34(2), 642-665.
- Liao, S.-H., Widowati, R., & Hsieh, Y.-C. (2021). Investigating online social media users’ behaviors for social commerce recommendations. Technology in Society, 66, 101655.
- Lin, X., & Wang, X. (2023). Towards a model of social commerce: improving the effectiveness of e-commerce through leveraging social media tools based on consumers’ dual roles. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(5), 782-799.
- Mishra, S., Jain, S., & Jham, V. (2021). Luxury rental purchase intention among millennials – A cross-national study. Thunderbird International Business Review, 63(4), 503-516.
- Nacar, R., & Ozdemir, K. (2022). From Commerce to E-Commerce and Social Commerce: How Global? How Local? In Industry 4.0 and Global Businesses (pp. 95-109). Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Nandini Singh. (2024). Bengaluru holds 36% of GCCs, Hyderabad excels in high-tech at 45%: Report | News - Business Standard. Business Standard.
- Peters, E., & Shoots-Reinhard, B. (2022). Numeracy and the Motivational Mind: The Power of Numeric Self-efficacy. Medical Decision Making, 42(6), 729-740.
- Shukri, A., Nordin, L., Salleh, F. I. M., Raidzwan, S. N. M., & Ahmad, R. (2020). UniKL students’ perception on synchronous learning using ICT as learning tools to learn English. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8), 793-796.
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425.
- Wang, J., Shahzad, F., Ahmad, Z., Abdullah, M., & Hassan, N. M. (2022). Trust and consumers’ purchase intention in a social commerce platform: A meta-analytic approach. Sage Open, 12(2), 21582440221091262.
- Wang, P., & Huang, Q. (2023). Digital influencers, social power and consumer engagement in social commerce. Internet Research, 33(1), 178-207.
- Ying, Z., Jianqiu, Z., Akram, U., & Rasool, H. (2021). TAM Model Evidence for Online Social Commerce Purchase Intention. Information Resources Management Journal, 34(1), 86-108.
- Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(3), 251-280.
- Yuen, K. F., Cai, L., Qi, G., & Wang, X. (2021). Factors influencing autonomous vehicle adoption: an application of the technology acceptance model and innovation diffusion theory. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(5), 505-519.