Ethical consumerism and demographic differences in preferences for regional food brands
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.21(4).2025.12
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2025, Issue #4, pp. 159-174
- 4 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of demographic factors on consumers’ ethical perceptions and purchasing behavior toward regional food product brands. Specifically, we examine how gender, parenthood, and age influence consumers’ ethical perceptions of regional food brands and their willingness to pay a premium. The survey instrument, based on locally recognized regional product brands from the Liberec Region, was administered online and on paper to respondents from the same region, yielding 384 valid responses using quota sampling with quotas set according to available demographic characteristics of the region’s population. Data were analyzed using non-parametric methods (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, Spearman’s correlation) and ANOVA, chosen for their suitability with non-normal distributions and ordinal or skewed data. The results reveal significant demographic differences. On average, women are willing to pay an 18% premium for regional food, compared to 13% for men. Parents of dependent children are willing to pay a 17% premium, while non-parents are willing to pay 14%. The lowest willingness to pay was recorded among individuals aged 85 and older, at 8%. In ethical perceptions, women and parents of dependent children view regional food consumption and support for local businesses as more ethically significant than men and non-parents. Age also plays a role, with younger (18-24) and older (65-84) consumers perceiving these practices as less ethical compared to middle-aged groups (25-44 and 45-64). The study concludes that while ethical considerations slightly influence willingness to pay, other factors likely play a more substantial role in shaping consumer behavior.
Acknowledgments
Supported by grant SGS-2024-1430 “The value of regional product brands” and internal grants by the
Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Liberec.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D12, D91, Q13, A13, Z13
-
References40
-
Tables16
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. The mean graph
-
- Table 1. Respondents’ characteristics
- Table 2. Differences in willingness to pay for regional food (H1: gender comparison)
- Table 3. Ranks of H2
- Table 4. Mann-Whitney test results for gender and parenthood (H1 and H2)
- Table 5. Kruskal-Wallis test results for age groups (H3)
- Table 6. Pairwise age group comparisons (H3)
- Table 7. Ethical perception of regional food (H4: gender)
- Table 8. Ranks of H5
- Table 9. Mann-Whitney test results for ethical perception (H4 and H5)
- Table 10. Spearman’s correlation coefficient
- Table 11. Tests of homogeneity of variances (H6)
- Table 12. ANOVA test for ethical perception by age group (H6)
- Table 13. Multiple comparisons between age groups
- Table 14. Calculation of Spearman’s Rho
- Table A1. Literature review summary
- Table B1. Summary of tested hypotheses
-
- Akoğlu, H. (2018). User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(3), 91-93.
- Andini, T. P., Adawiyah, R., & Indriani, Y. (2023). Attitudes, decision making and purchasing patterns of online vegetable consumers. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 8(3), 296-317.
- Baby, J., & Joseph, A. G. (2023). Tourists’ perceptions and motivations for local food. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 5(5), 160-165.
- Bartels, J., & Onwezen, M. C. (2014). Consumers’ willingness to buy products with environmental and ethical claims: The roles of social representations and social identity. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(1), 82-89.
- Bimbo, F., Russo, C., Di Fonzo, A., & Nardone, G. (2021). Consumers’ environmental responsibility and their purchase of local food: Evidence from a large-scale survey. British Food Journal, 123(5), 1853-1874.
- Büyükkaragöz, A. H., Baş, M., Sağlam, D., & Cengiz, Ş. E. (2014). Consumers’ awareness, acceptance and attitudes towards functional foods in Turkey. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(6), 628-635.
- Chen, A. N., Kim, D., Carson, M., & Schneider, S. P. (2023). International Comparison of Perceived Ethics Among Business Students. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 25(1).
- Coelho, F. C., Coelho, E. M., & Egerer, M. (2018). Local food: Benefits and failings due to modern agriculture. Scientia Agricola [Agricultural Science], 75(1), 84-94.
- Cvijanović, D., Ignjatijević, S., Vapa-Tankosić, J., & Cvijanović, V. (2020). Do local food products contribute to sustainable economic development? Sustainability, 12(7), 2847.
- Czech Statistical Office. (2023). Selected indicators of demographic development (time series) [Dataset].
- Ditlevsen, K., Denver, S., Christensen, T., & Lassen, J. (2020). A taste for locally produced food: Values, opinions and sociodemographic differences among ‘organic’ and ‘conventional’ consumers. Appetite, 147, 104544.
- Dove, M., Balasubramanian, A., & Narayanan, B. (2020). Transparency as a way of attaining quality, safety and optimal food purchases. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(4), 48-62.
- Haghiri, M. (2019). Consumers’ acceptability of using prominent new technologies in Atlantic salmon farming. Journal of Food and Nutrition Management, 2(1), 1-5.
- Hauke, J., & Kossowski, T. (2011). Comparison of values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaestiones Geographicae [Geographical Questions], 30(2), 87-93.
- Im, H., Lee, G., & Parr, J. (2023). Why consumers support local: Moral foundations theory and identity perspective. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 40(1), 15-26.
- Ishaq, M. I., Sarwar, H., & Ahmed, R. (2021). “A healthy outside starts from the inside”: A matter of sustainable consumption behavior in Italy and Pakistan. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 30(S1), 61-86.
- Karch, J. (2020). Psychologists should use Brunner-Munzel’s instead of Mann-Whitney’s U test as the default nonparametric procedure [Preprint]. PsyArXiv.
- Kim, T. K. (2017). Understanding one-way ANOVA using conceptual figures. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 70(1), 22-26.
- Kyung, M., Kim, D., & Ham, S. (2023). Factors affecting the willingness to pay extra for safe food. Nutrition Research and Practice, 17(3), 565-577.
- Lee, T. H., Fu, C., & Chen, Y. Y. (2020). Trust factors for organic foods: Consumer buying behavior. British Food Journal, 122(2), 414-431.
- Lin, Y.-C. (2020). Sustainable food, ethical consumption and responsible innovation: Insights from the slow food and “low carbon food” movements in Taiwan. Food, Culture & Society, 23(2), 155-172.
- Mishra, P., Singh, U., Pandey, C. K., Mishra, P., & Pandey, G. (2019). Application of Student’s t-test, analysis of variance, and covariance. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(4), 407-415.
- Möllers, J., Bäuml, T., & Dufhues, T. (2022). Understanding the market potential of products from alternative food networks in a transition economy: A discrete choice experiment. British Food Journal, 124(13), 183-199.
- Myers, L., & Sirois, M. J. (2005). Spearman correlation coefficients, differences between. In S. Kotz, C. B. Read, N. Balakrishnan, & B. Vidakovic (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (2nd ed.). Wiley.
- Nam, S. (2020). Moderating effects of consumer empowerment on the relationship between involvement in eco-friendly food and eco-friendly food behavior. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44(4), 297-305.
- Nikitina, M. A., & Chernukha, I. M. (2023). Nonparametric statistics. Part 3: Correlation coefficients. Theory and Practice of Meat Processing, 8(3), 237-251.
- Nwobi, F. N., & Akanno, F. (2021). Power comparison of ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests when error assumptions are violated. Advances in Methodology and Statistics, 18(2), 1-20.
- Oellingrath, I. M., Hersleth, M., & Svendsen, M. V. (2013). Association between parental motives for food choice and eating patterns of 12- to 13-year-old Norwegian children. Public Health Nutrition, 16(11), 2023-2031.
- Ostertagová, E., Ostertag, O., & Kováč, J. (2014). Methodology and application of the Kruskal-Wallis test. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 611, 115-120.
- Proškina, L., Kaufmane, D., Paula, L., Naglis-Liepa, K., & Ozolniece, S. (2022). Policy measures to support local food systems. Economic Science for Rural Development, 56, 231-239.
- Roos, E., Lehto, R., & Ray, C. (2012). Parental family food choice motives and children’s food intake. Food Quality and Preference, 24(1), 85-91.
- Salvesen, L., Hillesund, E. R., Vik, F. N., Brantsæter, A. L., & Øverby, N. C. (2019). Reproducibility and relative validity of a newly developed web-based food-frequency questionnaire for assessment of preconception diet. BMC Nutrition, 5(1), Article 11.
- Schoolman, E. D. (2020). Building community, benefiting neighbors: “Buying local” by people who do not fit the mold for “ethical consumers.” Journal of Consumer Culture, 20(3), 285-304.
- Sciarelli, M., Tani, M., Prisco, A., & Caputo, F. (2021). Fostering ethical consumption in the food sector: Insights from the Italian solidarity purchasing groups. British Food Journal, 123(9), 3100-3115.
- Steur, H., Gellynck, X., Feng, S., Rutsaert, P., & Verbeke, W. (2012). Determinants of willingness to pay for GM rice with health benefits in a high-risk region: Evidence from experimental auctions for folate biofortified rice in China. Food Quality and Preference, 25(2), 87-94.
- Sun, Y., Huang, Y., Fang, X., & Feng, Y. (2022). The purchase intention for agricultural products of regional public brands: Examining the influences of awareness, perceived quality, and brand trust. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, Article 4991059.
- Tamaki, S. (2024). Impacts of empathy, identity, and ethical branding on sustainable local food consumption. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 923-936.
- Twuijver, M., Olmedo, L., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (2020). Rural social enterprises in Europe: A systematic literature review. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 35(2), 121-142.
- Yu, H., & Hutson, A. D. (2020). A robust Spearman correlation coefficient permutation test [Preprint]. arXiv.
- Zámková, M., Rojík, S., Prokop, M., Činčalová, S., & Stolín, R. (2024). National labelling system of organic agriculture and food products: How familiar are Czech consumers with the national organic agri-food brand? Agriculture, 14(1), 100.


