Access to insurance for European SMEs: Patterns, clusters, and policy implications
- 
	DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ins.16(2).2025.08
 - 
	Article InfoVolume 16 2025, Issue #2, pp. 96-111
 
- 20 Views
 - 
	1 Downloads
 
							
								
							
							
							This work is licensed under a
							
								Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
							
						
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The study aims to explore the insurance profiles of SMEs and to identify access gaps across different firm categories, using the Ipsos European Public Affairs survey dataset, which consists of 8,187 SMEs from Europe. This dataset was analyzed using multiple correspondence analysis, cluster analysis, and discriminant analysis. Results show clear evidence of ownership concentration in a few insurance products: commercial motor (64.3% of SMEs own such an insurance), general liability (54.4%), and workers’ compensation (46.1%). On the other hand, uptake is lowest for cyber insurance (15.3%), non-damage business interruption (14.5%), and commercial insurance with business interruption (20.3%); notably, 8.2% report no insurance product ownership. Furthermore, three behavioral clusters were identified: minimally insured (n = 3,604; mean 1.58 policies), moderately insured (n = 2,603; mean 5.22), and broadly insured (n = 1,980; mean 6.73). Also, portfolios exhibit structured “baskets” with frequent co-ownership of general liability and motor (40%). Findings document systematic, demography-linked disparities and actionable access gaps. The study concludes that persistent disparities in access are linked to firm size, age, and turnover, underscoring the need for tailored policy measures and market solutions to address inclusion gaps. The practical value of this study lies in providing evidence-based insights for insurers, regulators, and policymakers seeking to expand SME risk protection.
Acknowledgment
We gratefully acknowledge EIOPA for providing access to the SME insurance dataset used in this study. 
- Keywords
 - 
	JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G22, L26, M21
 - 
	References32
 - 
	Tables9
 - 
	Figures3
 
- 
	
- Figure 1. Correlation between policies and principal dimensions in multiple correspondence analysis
 - Figure 2. Policy space and quality of representation (cos2) of policy categories (yes or no), in multiple correspondence analysis
 - Figure 3. Cluster membership in a two-dimensional space of the correspondence analysis
 
 
- 
	
- Table 1. Sample demographics: age, total turnover, SME category
 - Table 2. Insurance products that SMEs own, or do not own but consider important
 - Table 3. Proportion (%) of SMEs that own each insurance product, within the SME categories, Age and Total Turnover; number of owned policies (in total) across categories
 - Table 4. Proportion of SMEs (%) with two specific insurance products, along with the number of SMEs with 0, 1, …, 12 policies (in total)
 - Table 5. 40 most owned combinations of three or four insurance products
 - Table 6. Number of owned products (in total), across clusters
 - Table 7. Clusters and insurance products
 - Table 8. Clusters vs demographics
 - Table A1. Two specific questions of the questionnaire used in this study
 
 
- 
	
- Asai, Y. (2019). Why do small and medium enterprises (SMEs) demand property liability insurance? Journal of Banking and Finance, 106, 298-304.
 - Beck, Th., & Demirguc-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(11), 2931-2943.
 - Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., & Niknafs, A. (2014). NbClust: An R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. Journal of Statistical Software, 61, 1-36.
 - Danielsson, M., & Scott, J. (2006). The capital budgeting decisions of small businesses. Journal of Applied Finance, 16(2), 45-56.
 - Davidson III, Wallace N., Cross, M., & Thornton, J. (1992). Corporate demand for insurance: Some empirical and theoretical results. Journal of Financial Services Research, 6(1), 61-72.
 - Di Bella, L., Katsinis, A., Lagüera-González, J., Odenthal, L., Hell, M., & Lozar, B. (2023). Annual Report on European SMEs 2022/2023. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
 - Ding, Y., & Deng, P. (2024). Learning from natural disasters: Evidence from enterprise property insurance take-up in China. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 68(3), 299-334.
 - Ekanem, I., & Smallbone, D. (2007). Learning in small manufacturing firms: The case of investment decision-making behaviour. International Small Business Journal, 25(2), 107-129.
 - Everitt, B. S. (2006). An R and S-PLUS® Companion to Multivariate Analysis. London: Springer.
 - Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.
 - Hall, G., Hutchinson, P., & Michaelas, N. (2004). Determinants of the capital structure of European SMEs. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 31(5), 711-728.
 - Hoyt, R. E., & Khang, H. (2000). On the demand for corporate property insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 67(1), 91-107.
 - Husson, F., Josse, J., Le, S., Mazet, J., & Husson, M. F. (2020). Package ‘FactoMineR’. Multivariate Exploratory Data Analysis and Data Mining.
 - Insurance and Reinsurance Stakeholder Group – European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (IRSG-EIOPA). (2022). SMEs Access to Insurance – The Information Gap and a Way Forward.
 - Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
 - Kumar, S., Sureka, R., & Colombage, S. (2020). Capital structure of SMEs: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 70(4), 535-565.
 - Lazaridis, I. T. (2004). Capital budgeting practices: A survey in the firms in Cyprus. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(4), 427-433.
 - Mayers, D., & Smith, C. W. (1982). On the corporate demand for insurance. Journal of Business, 55(2), 281-296.
 - Mayers, D., & Smith, C. W. (1987). Corporate insurance and the underinvestment problem. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 54(1), 45-54.
 - Mayers, D., & Smith, C. W. (1990). On the corporate demand for insurance: evidence from reinsurance market. Journal of Business, 63(1), 19-40.
 - O’Sullivan, N. (1997). Insuring the agents: The role of directors’ and officers’ insurance in corporate governance. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 64(3), 545-556.
 - Psillaki, M., & Daskalakis, N. (2009). Are the determinants of capital structure country or firm specific? Small Business Economics, 33(3), 319-333.
 - Regan, L., & Hur, Y. (2007). On the corporate demand for insurance: The case of Korean non-financial firms. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 74(4), 829-850.
 - Ricci, O., & Santilli, G. (2024), Exploring the link between financial literacy and business interruption insurance: evidence from Italian micro-enterprises. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 49, 663-681.
 - Sarwary, Z. (2019). Capital budgeting techniques in SMEs: A literature review. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 19(3), 97-114.
 - Smith, C. W., & Warner, J. B. (1979). On financial contracting: an analysis of bond covenants. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(2), 117-161.
 - Torres, O., & Julien, P. A. (2005). Specificity and denaturing of small business. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 23(4), 355-377.
 - United Nations. (2023, June 27). Micro-, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Day.
 - Wakeman, L. M. (1980). Optimal tax depreciation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2(3), 213-237.
 - World Bank. (2021, July 31). Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Finance. IBRD-IDA.
 - Yamori, N. (1999). An empirical investigation of the Japanese corporate demand for insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 66(2), 239-252.
 - Zou, H., & Adams, M.B. (2006). The corporate purchase of property insurance: Chinese evidence. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 15(2), 165-196.
 
 

					
